dinsdag 10 februari 2009

Palestina 2


The resistance option Robin Yassin-Kassab, The Electronic Intifada, 8 February 2009

Hamas isn't Hizballah and Gaza isn't Lebanon. The resistance in Gaza -- which includes leftist and nationalist as well as Islamist forces -- doesn't have mountains to fight in. It has no strategic depth. It doesn't have Syria behind it to keep supply lines open; instead it has Israel's wall and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's goons. Lebanese civilians can flee north and east, while Gaza's repeat-refugees have no escape. The Lebanese have their farms, and supplies from outside; Gaza has been under total siege for years. Hizballah has remarkable discipline and is surely the best-trained, most disciplined force in the region. Although it has made great strides, Hamas is still undisciplined. Crucially, Hizballah has air-tight intelligence control in Lebanon, while Gaza contains collaborators like maggots in a corpse.But Hamas is still standing. On the rare occasions when Israel actually fought -- rather than just called in air strikes -- its soldiers reported "ferocious" resistance. Hamas withstood 22 days of the most barbaric bombing Zionism has yet stooped to, and did not surrender. Rocket fire continued from Gaza after Israel declared its unilateral ceasefire.Let's put this in context. In 1947-48 Zionist militias drove out more than 700,000 Palestinians without too much trouble. In 1967 it took Israel six days to destroy the Egyptian, Syrian and Jordanian armies, and to capture the West Bank, Gaza, the Golan Heights and the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula. Zionism's last "victory" was the expulsion of the Palestine Liberation Organization from Beirut in 1982 -- if it was a victory.The long and bloody occupation of Lebanon gave birth to new forms of resistance. Where Arab states and armies had failed, popular resistance removed American and French forces from Beirut, and then steadily rolled back the Israelis. The first suicide bomber of the conflict was a Marxist woman of Christian background. The human bomb was a tactic to which Israeli troops had no answer. Hizballah formed, and developed into the power that would drive Israel from almost all of Lebanon by 2000. In 2006 Israel returned, in an effort to finish the resistance once and for all. What happened was a historic turnaround: for five weeks Israeli troops bled in the border villages, and failed to move beyond them. For the first time, the hi-tech, first-world savagery of the Zionist army, supposedly the fourth strongest army in the world, was kept at bay. Israel of course killed far more civilians than Hizballah did, and performed its usual rampage against civilian infrastructure, but in terms of the soldiers in battle, casualties were roughly equal.There has been a lot of talk, particularly by Arab collaborators, about Hizballah being an Iranian proxy. While Iran does assist the resistance with weapons and funds, the Lebanese resistance is Lebanese, the creation of the villagers of the south and the Bekaa, and the families of the southern suburbs of Beirut. It was the people themselves who turned Zionism back. Even more improbably, the same collaborators now accuse Hamas, a democratically-elected Palestinian Sunni movement, of taking orders from Tehran.'

4 opmerkingen:

Anoniem zei

"the hi-tech, first-world savagery of the Zionist army, supposedly the fourth strongest army in the world, was kept at bay."

Ik betwijfel of het israelisch leger het vierde sterkste leger ter wereld is zoals vaak wordt gesuggereerd. Laten we aannemen dat de VS, Rusland en China de eerste drie zijn. Dat zou betekenen dat Israel sterker is dan bijvoorbeeld het VK, Frankrijk, Ukraine en India om er een paar te noemen. Vooral als je ook dit leest:

"On the rare occasions when Israel actually fought -- rather than just called in air strikes -- its soldiers reported "ferocious" resistance."

Ze krijgen veel materiaal van de VS en gebruiken die om de zoveel tijd om een kleine groep (vaak weerloze) groep/bevolking voornamelijk te bombarderen. Dit doen ze vaak ook als afschrikmiddel. Een boodschap aan de buren in de regio. Maar ik vraag me af hoe hoog ze zouden scoren in de ranglijst als:
a. de vs op een dag zegt: bekijken jullie t voortaan maar. Geen wapens en geen geld voor jullie.
b. ze een oorlog moeten voeren tegen een land als bijvoorbeeld Turkije.

Anoniem zei

Haha, mijn woordverificatie bij de vorige post was MICAIN. Zat ik helemaal niet op te wachten.

Anoniem zei

Het zou wel interessant zijn te weten met welke wapens Hamas (en anderen) zich teweerstelden tegen de Israelische invasie. Ik hoorde van mensen die er een beetje kijk op hebben, dat - zoals het artikel meldt - dit niet in verhouding staat tot de bewapening va Hezbollah.

stan zei

dat klopt
hamas bezit itt hezbollah bijvoorbeeld geen antitank raketten, die zo succesvol bleken tijdens de isralische invasie in libanon in 2006.
stan

Putin says Ukraine has turned into a GLOBAL CONFLICT.

  https://x.com/LegitTargets/status/1860035523152077154 Legitimate Targets @LegitTargets BREAKING: RUSSIA launches NUCLEAR-CAPABLE BALLISTI...