Just why is Disney such a
threat? The primary reason is that his products, necessitated and facilitated
by a huge industrial capitalist empire are imported together with so many other
consumer objects into the dependent country, which is dependent precisely
because it depends on commodities arising economically and intellectually in
the power center’s totally alien (foreign) conditions. Our countries are
exporters of raw materials, and importers of superstructural and cultural
goods. To service our ‘monoproduct’ economies and provide urban paraphernalia,
we send copper, and they send machines to extract copper, and, of course, Coca
Cola. Behind the Coca Cola stands a whole structure of expectations and models
of behavior, and with it, a particular kind of present and future society, and
an interpretation of the past. As we import the industrial product conceived,
packaged and labeled abroad, and sold to the profit of the rich foreign uncle,
at the same time we also import the foreign cultural forms of that society, but
without their context: the advanced capitalist social conditions upon which
they are based. It is historically proven that the dependent countries have
been maintained in dependency by the continued international division of labor
which restricts any development capable of leading to economic independence.
Dorfman en Mattelart. How
To Read Donald Duck. Imperialist Ideology in the Disney Comic. 1975
These early Puritans had a kink
in their ideology; when they went wrong, they went very, very wrong. Devoted to
the ideal of a corporate community guided by a strong moral sense, they
developed a great talent for misinterpreting any opposition. From the outside,
for example, they were prone to view the Indians as agents of the Devil
waiting to test their convictions…
This propensity to place Evil
outside their system not only distorted the Puritans’ own doctrine, it inclined
them toward a solution which involved the extension of their own system over
others. Here was a subtle convergence of religious and secular ideas, for
mercantilism emphasized the necessity as well as the desirability of expansion
in economic and political affairs.
William Appleman Williams. The Contours Of American History. 1961
America… Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or
shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the
well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and
vindicator only of her own. She will commend the general cause
by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under
other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence,
she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of
interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume
the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her
policy would insensibly change from liberty to force. The frontlet on her brows
would no longer beam with the ineffable splendor of freedom and independence;
but in its stead would soon be substituted an imperial diadem, flashing in
false and tarnished lustre the murky radiance of dominion and power. She might
become the dictatress of the world; she would be no longer the ruler of her own
spirit… Her glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the
mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is,
Freedom, Independence, Peace. This has been her Declaration: this has been, as
far as her necessary intercourse with the rest of mankind would permit, her
practice.
President John Quincy Adams. Independence Day address. 1821
The inconstancy of American
foreign policy is not an accident but an expression of two distinct sides of
the American character. Both are characterized by a kind of moralism, but one
is the morality of decent instincts tempered by knowledge of human imperfection
and the other is the morality of absolute self-assurance fired by the crusading
spirit.
Senator J. William Fulbright. The Arrogance of Power. 1966
To His Excellency, the Secretary of State of the Republic of the United
States, Delegate to the Peace Conference
Excellency,
We take the liberty of submitting to you the accompanying memorandum
setting forth the claims of the Annamite people on the occasion of the Allied
victory. We count on your kindness to honor our appeal by your support whenever
the opportunity arises. We beg your Excellency graciously to accept the
expression of our profound respect.
Since the victory of the allies, all subject peoples are frantic with
hope at the prospect of an era of right and justice which should begin for them
by virtue of the formal and solemn engagements, made before the whole world by
the various powers and the entente in the struggle of civilization against
barbarism. While waiting for the principle of national self-determination to
pass from ideal to reality through the effective recognition of the sacred
right of all peoples to decide their own destiny, the inhabitants of the
ancient Empire of Annam, at the present time French Indochina, present to the
noble Governments of the entente in general and the honorable French Government
the following humble claims:
1) General amnesty for all native people who have been condemned for
political activity.
2) Reform of the Indochinese justice system by granting to the native
population the same judicial guarantees as the Europeans have and the total
suppression of the special courts which are the instruments of terrorization
and oppression against the most responsible elements of the Annamite people.
3) Freedom of Press.
4) Freedom to associate freely.
5) Freedom to emigrate and to travel abroad.
6) Freedom of education, and creation in every province of technical and
professional schools for the native population.
7) Replacement of the regime of arbitrary decrees by a regime of law.
For the Group of Annamite Patriots
Signed] Nguyen Ai Quoc
56, rue Monsieur le Prince-Paris
Ho Chi Minh. Memorandum aan Robert Lansing, Amerikaanse
minister van Buitenlandse Zaken. 18 juni 1919
De Amerikaanse diplomaten horen
tot de beste ter wereld… De Verenigde Staten hebben de hand gehad in talloze
vredesonderhandelingen, niet zelden met succes. Het waren Amerikaanse
presidenten, Wilson en Roosevelt, die de aanzet gaven tot een hele reeks
internationale instituten die, ondanks alle problemen, een begin van orde
brachten in de mondiale politiek en economie… De Amerikaanse politiek bleef
sterk antikolonialistisch… Het land fungeerde… decennialang als ordebewaker en
politieagent – om maar te zwijgen van alle hulp die het uitdeelde. En nog steeds
zijn de Verenigde Staten het anker van het hele Atlantische deel van de wereld
in de ruimste zin van het woord.
Geert Mak. Reizen zonder John.
Op zoek naar Amerika. 2012
How did Woodrow Wilson address imperialism? Address
it? He founded the rhetoric that every imperialist war has been based on in the
last 80 years. He is practically the father of modern American imperialism. His
act of addressing imperialism was his Fourteen Points, which were really only
meant to give America economic access to the colonies of the European empires.
Open Door imperialism
consisted of using U.S. political power to guarantee access to foreign markets
and resources on terms favorable to American corporate interests, without
relying on direct political rule. Its central goal was to obtain for U.S.
merchandise, in each national market, treatment equal to that afforded any other
industrial nation. Most importantly, this entailed active engagement by the
U.S. government in breaking down the imperial powers' existing spheres of
economic influence or preference. The result, in most cases, was to treat as
hostile to U.S. security interests any large-scale attempt at autarky, or any
other policy whose effect was to withdraw a major area from the disposal of
U.S. corporations. When the power attempting such policies was an equal, like
the British Empire, the U.S. reaction was merely one of measured coolness. When
it was perceived as an inferior, like Japan, the U.S. resorted to more forceful
measures, as events of the late 1930s indicate. And whatever the degree of
equality between advanced nations in their access to Third World markets, it
was clear that Third World nations were still to be subordinated to the
industrialized West in a collective sense. Indeed, one thinks that Kautsky had
the Open Door in mind in formulating his theory of ‘ultra-imperialism,’ in
which the developed capitalist nations cooperated to exploit the Third World
collectively.
This Open Door system
was the direct ancestor of today's neoliberal system, which is falsely called
‘free trade’ in the apologetics of court intellectuals. It depended on active
management of the world economy by dominant states, and continuing intervention
to police the international economic order and enforce sanctions against states
which did not cooperate. Woodrow Wilson, in a 1907 lecture at Columbia
University, said:
Since trade ignores national boundaries and the
manufacturer insists on having the world as a market, the flag of his nation
must follow him, and the doors of the nations which are closed must be battered
down.... Concessions obtained by financiers must be safeguarded by ministers of
state, even if the sovereignty of unwilling nations be outraged in the process.
Colonies must be obtained or planted, in order that no useful corner of the
world may be overlooked or left unused. Peace itself becomes a matter of
conference and international combinations.
Wilson warned during
the 1912 election that ‘Our industries
have expanded to such a point that they will burst their jackets if they cannot
find a free [that is, guaranteed by the state] outlet to the markets of the world.’
In a 1914 address to
the National Foreign Trade Convention, Secretary of Commerce Redfield followed
very nearly the same theme:
...we have learned the lesson now, that our factories are so large
that their output at full time is greater than America's market can
continuously absorb. We know
now that if we will run full time all the time, we must do it by reason of the
orders we take from lands beyond the sea. To do less than that means homes in
America in which the husbands are without work; to do that means factories that
are shut down part of the time.
On Feb. 28, 1946 -- 66 years
ago today -- President Harry Truman received a
telegram from an Asian leader who would come to play a major, major
role in U.S. foreign policy.
Ho Chi Minh.
Ho asked Truman to help the
fledgling Vietnamese nation in its battle with French colonialists.
‘I therefore most earnestly
appeal to you personally and to the American people to interfere urgently in
support of our independence and help making the negotiations more in keeping
with the principles of the Atlantic and San Francisco charters,’
said the telegram. The
request was ignored.
USA Today. When Ho Chi Minh wrote President Truman. 28 februari 2012
Het is nagenoeg onmogelijk om in de mainstream media het beeld dat westerse opiniemakers als Geert Mak geven te nuanceren, laat staan
fundamenteel te bekritiseren. Het beeld moet blijven bestaan dat onder andere
president Wilson ‘de aanzet’ gaf tot het ‘begin van orde… in de mondiale politiek en
economie.’ Feiten spelen geen rol in deze propaganda, die worden domweg verzwegen om ervoor te zorgen dat de ‘geheime liefde’ voor het ‘droomland’
kan blijven bestaan.
De waarschuwing van de zesde president van de VS, John
Quincy Adams, zoon van de tweede president van het land, is vergeefs geweest.
De VS is al meer dan een eeuw ‘in search of monsters to destroy’ ‘to guarantee access to
foreign markets and resources on terms favorable to American corporate
interests.’ En ook al
verklaarde een president als Woodrow Wilson zelfs dat ‘since trade ignores national boundaries and the manufacturer insists on
having the world as a market, the flag of his nation must follow him, and the
doors of the nations which are closed must be battered down’ dan nog zullen westerse mainstream-opiniemakers
volhouden dat tot het uitbreken van de Koude Oorlog de ‘Amerikaanse politiek sterk antikolonialistisch [bleef].’ Ook
al wees Fulbright als langst zittende voorzitter van de Senate Foreign
Relations Committee op het feit dat de Amerikaanse buitenlandse politiek gevoed
wordt door ‘the
morality of absolute self-assurance fired by the crusading spirit,’ dan nog verandert dit niet de beweringen van de officiele spreekbuizen van de mach.
Ook al verklaarde president Woodrow Wilson dat ‘concessions obtained by financiers must be safeguarded
by ministers of state, even if the sovereignty of unwilling nations be outraged
in the process,’ dan nog zal Mak in zijn mainstream-reisboek waarin
hij ‘op zoek naar Amerika,’
is, staande houden dat de VS ‘decennialang als ordebewaker en
politieagent [fungeerde] – om maar te zwijgen van alle hulp die het uitdeelde.’ De behoudende Amerikaanse historicus Walter A.
McDougall mag dan wel concluderen dat de VS ‘beginning in 1898… canonized
a new foreign policy testament,’ hetgeen heeft geleid tot een moderne
variant van het aloude Europese kolonialisme, toch zullen onze westerse opiniemakers in de commerciele massamedia dit blijven ontkennen. In de huidige virtuele wereld is het beeld overtuigender geworden dan de
werkelijkheid. En omdat mainstream-opiniemakers
als Mak 'niet zonder hoop' kunnen 'Stan, dat klinkt misschien wat pathetisch, maar
het is toch zo,’ moet permanent de schijn van normaliteit worden opgehouden. In The
Image schreef de Amerikaanse historicus Daniel J. Boorstin:
One of the deepest and least
remarkable features of the Age of Contrivance is what I would call the mirror
effect. Nearly everything we do to enlarge our world, to make life more
interesting, more varied, more exiting, more vivid, more ‘fabulous,’ more
promising, in the long run has an opposite effect. In the extravagance of our
expectations and in our ever increasing power, we transform elusive dreams into
graspable images within which each of us can fit. By doing so we mark our
boundaries of our world with a wall of mirrors. Our strenuous and elaborate
efforts to enlarge experience have the unintended result of narrowing it. In
frenetic quest for the unexpected, we end by finding only the unexpectedness we
have planned for ourselves. We meet ourselves coming back. A Hollywood love
triangle, according to Leo Rosten (joodse humorist svh), consists of an actor, his wife, and himself.
All of us are now entangled with ourselves. Everywhere we see ourselves in the
mirror.
En zo overtuigt de mainstream zichzelf. Overal praten de woordvoerders van de macht elkaar na. Overal klinkt de officieel gesanctioneerde versie van de werkelijkheid. Overal worden versleten
denkbeelden weerspiegeld, net zo vaak en net zolang totdat de meerderheid niets anders meer
kan zien dan de oneindige weerspiegeling. Meer daarover maandag.
