Zij aan zij met deze Israelische militairen en hun trofee.- Sonja zei
-
Israël doet al jarenlang mee met NAVO-oefeningen, zij het met een administratieve truc, zodat regeringen zich niet hoeven te verantwoorden. Het gewapende songfestival.
2006: Israel joins NATO exercise for the first time
Israel has participated in a naval exercise with NATO in the Black Sea.
This constituted Israel's first experience in joining NATO during its exercises.
The exercise, which took place at the end of June, was named 'Cooperative Mako 06' and more than 30 ships and aircraft carrying more than 2,000 military and civilian personnel took part.
The Naples, Italy-based Allied Joint Force Command coordinated the exercise, which was run near Constanta in Romania.
Israel was invited to participate in the exercise as a member of NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue - a 10-year-old forum for political consultations and practical cooperation between countries of the Mediterranean region including Morocco, Algeria, Egypt and Jordan.
"Great excitement"
Lt.-Col. Ilan Lavi told the Jerusalem Post," The excitement is great. We feel like we are making history by becoming the first Israeli ship to participate in a NATO exercise."
Lavi explained that it was important that Israel learns different operating systems, especially NATO's. "The idea is to create a better dialogue between us and NATO," explained Lavi.
"They use different systems, a different operational language and just do things differently so we have a lot to learn."
Lavi was in charge of the Eilat, one of Israel's Sa'ar 5-class missile ship during the exercise.
Accompanying the Eilat on the maneuvers was an Israel Air Force helicopter.
Greater cooperation
In addition to forces from Israel and nine NATO countries, Cooperative Mako '06 also included military forces from Algeria, Albania, Azerbaijan, Croatia and Georgia.
Observers from the United Arab Emirates also took part, as were teams from the United Nations and Red Cross.
“Cooperative Mako”, according to an AJFC news release, is designed to ensure that NATO and other partner nations are trained to conduct joint missions, if necessary.
In related news, a US House of Representatives committee unanimously approved a resolution that calls for enhancing Israel’s relationship with NATO.
The resolution recommends upgrading Israel’s affiliation to a “leading member of NATO’s Individual Cooperation Program,” a promotion the bill says ultimately will lead to Israel’s full membership in the alliance. - Sonja zei
-
2007 Jerusalem Post (verwijderd, alleen nog in cache - vet van mij)
Israel moves closer to NATO missions
Israel moved a step closer towards joining global NATO missions after the IDF agreed to upgrade relations and joint military training and exercises to enhance interoperability with the western military alliance, Assistant NATO Sec.-Gen. John Colston told The Jerusalem Post .
...
"The operational capabilities concept would enable Israeli units to work alongside forces from allies and other partner nations and benefit from mutual exercises and shared evaluation," explained Colston, who is responsible for defense policy and planning at NATO headquarters in Brussels.
...
The decision to upgrade relations with NATO and to participate in more exercises would create better cooperation between the IDF and the western militaries that are members of the alliance. It would also create a common operational language that could one day be used in any international operation involving the IDF.
...
Israel was the first Mediterranean Dialogue country to sign an ICP with NATO.
Other topics that came up during the talks had to do with intelligence sharing between the IDF and NATO. In January, Military Intelligence hosted a group of 50 military officers from NATO countries and, in an effort to create better interoperability between countries in the global war on terror, drafted plans to establish an intelligence-sharing mechanism with the Western military alliance. Colston said that since the seminar, Israel and NATO have upgraded their level of cooperation and sharing of intelligence.
Colston also discussed the challenges NATO was facing in Afghanistan and particularly the threat of Improvised Roadside Devices (IED). He said Israel was a member of a NATO team that was working on finding solutions to deal with the threat.
"We agreed to share lessons from Afghanistan with Israel to gain and benefit from one another," he said.
Tot zover Sonja. De westerse politici blijven de Israelische terreur passief en actief steunen. Het is een van de tekenen hoe groot het gat tussen volksvertegenwoordigers en de bevolking is geworden. Terwijl Israel door burgers algemeen gezien wordt als een natie die zich gedraagt als een schurkenstaat, proberen achter de schermen de politici de banden aan te halen met 'de Joodse staat'. Een voorbeeld daarvan wordt hieronder gegeven:
ISRAEL ALS NAVO'S WAPENBROEDER - EN OMGEKEERD?
dinsdag 19 januari 2010 23:22 door J. Jan Willem van Waning
Tags: israel, israel and iran, israel & de palestijnen, israel and the world opinion, navo, amerika, amerika & navo, midden-oosten, midden-oosten crisis
David Ben-Gurion droomde ervan en Avigdor Lieberman, de huidige 'fascistische' Israelische minister van buitenlandse zaken, streeft er actief naar: Israel als lid van de NAVO.
Terwijl de NAVO, onder Amerikaanse leiding (en druk) , een steeds sterkere mondiale rol aanneemt, verzekert Israel zich van de eerste plaats onder haar partners. Zo bereikt dit land dat zijn binnenlandse en regionale conflicten om nationaal territoir en mensenrechten worden ondergebracht in de Westerse wereldwijde 'oorlog tegen (islamitisch) terrorisme' - ten onrechte en daarbij een potentieel gevaarlijke ontwikkeling.
Voor wie zich wil verdiepen in de diverse aspecten van dit belangrijke onderwerp - dat nauwelijks aandacht krijgt in onze media - , hieronder enkele links en uittreksels:
Israel and NATO – Between Membership and Partnership
MADRID – The idea of integrating Israel into NATO has frequently been advanced as bait to encourage the Jewish state to make the necessary concessions for an Arab-Israeli peace settlement. And some Israeli leaders – Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, for example – are convinced that joining NATO would act as a vital deterrent against Iran.
But it is highly unlikely that Israel’s full integration into the Alliance is feasible from NATO’s standpoint. The Alliance would not be happy to apply Article 5 of the NATO charter, which would oblige its members to fight for Israel if it were attacked by any of its many potential enemies in an endemically dangerous region.
Nor is it clear that membership would be in the best interest of Israel, a country whose defense doctrine has been always based on self-reliance and freedom of maneuver in security matters. Israel’s unwritten alliance with the United States is a more convenient alternative...
The options for further cooperation are many, ranging from intelligence and procurement to the development of an updated anti-terrorism doctrine (including cyber-terrorism), a domain to which NATO is a newcomer. David Ben-Gurion’s dream of Israel becoming a NATO member might not materialize, but the developing partnership reflects the Alliance’s unequivocal recognition that Israel shares the challenges facing the West and is a vital partner in developing responses to them.
Israel: Global NATO’s 29th Member (by Rick Rozoff in Global Research.ca)
As the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is pressuring its 28 member states and dozens of partnership affiliates on five continents to contribute more troops for the war in Afghanistan, the Jerusalem Post reported on January 13 that “Israel is launching a diplomatic initiative in an effort to influence the outcome of NATO’s new Strategic Concept which is currently under review by a team of experts led by former United States Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.”...
Recently Madeleine Albright has been traveling to several European capitals to preside over a series of seminars on the updated Strategic Concept and the latest of those, in Oslo, Norway on January 13, was attended by officials from the Israeli Foreign Ministry.
In preparation for the above meeting “Several weeks ago, a former senior Israeli diplomat met privately with Albright to discuss Israeli interests in the concept that is under review.”
The same source added the following background information:
“Israeli-NATO ties have increased dramatically in recent years. Chairman of the Military Committee, Admiral Giampaolo Di Paola visited Israel in November, and the Israeli Navy has announced plans to deploy a missile ship with Active Endeavour, a NATO mission to patrol the Mediterranean Sea….
“Israel is also seeking to receive an upgraded status following the conclusion of the Strategic Concept review that will enable Israeli officials to participate in top NATO forums….Israel is a member of the Mediterranean Dialogue, which was created in 1994 to foster ties with Middle Eastern countries like Israel, Jordan, Egypt and Morocco.” ...
On February 24, 2005 Jaap de Hoop Scheffer became the first NATO secretary general to visit Israel and the next month “Israel and NATO conducted their first ever joint naval exercise in the Red Sea, signalling a strengthening of relations.” An Alliance naval group visited the Israeli Red Sea port of Eilat for a week-long visit, “which included a joint exercise with the Israel Navy.”
As Britain’s Jane’s Defence Weekly reported, “The novelty in the exercise was the fact it was conducted with NATO ships, which operate regularly in the Mediterranean, but rarely visit the Red Sea.”
In May of the same year it was announced that “Israel plans to stage three military exercises with NATO during 2005.
“Israeli officials said the government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has submitted a plan to NATO that would include the staging of three exercises with Israel’s military over the next 10 months. They said the exercises would take place at NATO headquarters in Brussels….”
An Israeli official was cited as saying, “We have no doubt that Israel will gain immensely from closer ties with NATO, and we also believe that Israel has much to offer NATO in return.”...
The Washington Post published his article “Contain Iran: Admit Israel to NATO” on February 21, 2006 which contained these recommendations:
“The best way to provide Israel with that additional security is to upgrade its relationship with the collective defense arm of the West: NATO. Whether that upgraded relationship culminates in membership for Israel or simply a much closer strategic and operational defense relationship can be debated.”
“Several leading Europeans have called for NATO to embrace Israel, but this debate will not get serious until the United States, Israel’s main ally, puts its weight behind the idea. The time has come to do so.”..
“Israel and NATO have approved a long-term plan for cooperation in 27 different areas” and “Israel is the first non-European country, and the first in the Middle East to cooperate with NATO and reach a bilateral agreement with the organization.”...
Lees verder: http://www.vkblog.nl/bericht/297234/Israel_als_NAVO%27s_wapenbroeder_-_en_om
Hieronder kunt u lezen in welke mate Israel is veranderd in een schurkenstaat:
Israel Has No Intention of Granting a Palestinian State
If Hamas Did Not Exist
By JENNIFER LOEWENSTEIN
Let us get one thing perfectly straight. If the wholesale mutilation and degradation of the Gaza Strip is going to continue; if Israel’s will is at one with that of the United States; if the European Union, Russia, the United Nations and all the international legal agencies and organizations spread across the globe are going to continue to sit by like hollow mannequins doing nothing but making repeated “calls” for a “ceasefire” on “both sides”; if the cowardly, obsequious and supine Arab States are going to stand by watching their brethren get slaughtered by the hour while the world’s bullying Superpower eyes them threateningly from Washington lest they say something a little to their disliking; then let us at least tell the truth why this hell on earth is taking place.
The state terror unleashed from the skies and on the ground against the Gaza Strip as we speak has nothing to do with Hamas. It has nothing to do with “Terror”. It has nothing to do with the long-term “security” of the Jewish State or with Hizbullah or Syria or Iran except insofar as it is aggravating the conditions that have led up to this crisis today. It has nothing to do with some conjured-up “war” – a cynical and overused euphemism that amounts to little more the wholesale enslavement of any nation that dares claim its sovereign rights; that dares assert that its resources are its own; that doesn’t want one of the Empire’s obscene military bases sitting on its cherished land.
This crisis has nothing to do with freedom, democracy, justice or peace. It is not about Mahmoud Zahhar or Khalid Mash’al or Ismail Haniyeh. It is not about Hassan Nasrallah or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. These are all circumstantial players who have gained a role in the current tempest only now that the situation has been allowed for 61 years to develop into the catastrophe that it is today. The Islamist factor has colored and will continue to color the atmosphere of the crisis; it has enlisted the current leaders and mobilized wide sectors of the world’s population. The primary symbols today are Islamic – the mosques, the Qur’an, the references to the Prophet Muhammad and to Jihad. But these symbols could disappear and the impasse would continue.
There was a time when Fatah and the PFLP held the day; when few Palestinians wanted anything to do with Islamist policies and politics. Such politics have nothing to do with primitive rockets being fired over the border, or smuggling tunnels and black-market weapons; just as Arafat’s Fatah had little to do with stones and suicide bombings. The associations are coincidental; the creations of a given political environment. They are the result of something entirely different than what the lying politicians and their analysts are telling you. They have become part of the landscape of human events in the modern Middle East today; but incidentals wholly as lethal, or as recalcitrant, deadly, angry or incorrigible could just as soon have been in their places.
Strip away the clichés and the vacuous newspeak blaring out across the servile media and its pathetic corps of voluntary state servants in the Western world and what you will find is the naked desire for hegemony; for power over the weak and dominion over the world’s wealth. Worse yet you will find that the selfishness, the hatred and indifference, the racism and bigotry, the egotism and hedonism that we try so hard to cover up with our sophisticated jargon, our refined academic theories and models actually help to guide our basest and ugliest desires. The callousness with which we in indulge in them all are endemic to our very culture; thriving here like flies on a corpse.
Strip away the current symbols and language of the victims of our selfish and devastating whims and you will find the simple, impassioned and unaffected cries of the downtrodden; of the ‘wretched of the earth’ begging you to cease your cold aggression against their children and their homes; their families and their villages; begging you to leave them alone to have their fish and their bread, their oranges, their olives and their thyme; asking you first politely and then with increasing disbelief why you cannot let them live undisturbed on the land of their ancestors; unexploited, free of the fear of expulsion; of ravishment and devastation; free of permits and roadblocks and checkpoints and crossings; of monstrous concrete walls, guard towers, concrete bunkers, and barbed wire; of tanks and prisons and torture and death. Why is life without these policies and instruments of hell impossible?
The answer is because Israel has no intention of allowing a viable, sovereign Palestinian state on its borders. It had no intention of allowing it in 1948 when it grabbed 24 per cent more land than what it was allotted legally, if unfairly, by UN Resolution 181. It had no intention of allowing it throughout the massacres and ploys of the 1950s. It had no intention of allowing two states when it conquered the remaining 22 per cent of historic Palestine in 1967 and reinterpreted UN Security Council Resolution 248 to its own liking despite the overwhelming international consensus stating that Israel would receive full international recognition within secure and recognized borders if it withdrew from the lands it had only recently occupied.
It had no intention of acknowledging Palestinian national rights at the United Nations in 1974, when –alone with the United States—it voted against a two-state solution. It had no intention of allowing a comprehensive peace settlement when Egypt stood ready to deliver but received, and obediently accepted, a separate peace exclusive of the rights of Palestinians and the remaining peoples of the region. It had no intention of working toward a just two-state solution in 1978 or 1982 when it invaded, fire-bombed, blasted and bulldozed Beirut so that it might annex the West Bank without hassle. It had no intention of granting a Palestinian state in 1987 when the first Intifada spread across occupied Palestine, into the Diaspora and the into the spirits of the global dispossessed, or when Israel deliberately aided the newly formed Hamas movement so that it might undermine the strength of the more secular-nationalist factions.
Israel had no intention of granting a Palestinian state at Madrid or at Oslo where the PLO was superseded by the quivering, quisling Palestinian Authority, too many of whose cronies grasped at the wealth and prestige it gave them at the expense of their own kin. As Israel beamed into the world’s satellites and microphones its desire for peace and a two-state solution, it more than doubled the number of illegal Jewish settlements on the ground in the West Bank and around East Jerusalem, annexing them as it built and continues to build a superstructure of bypass roads and highways over the remaining, severed cities and villages of earthly Palestine. It has annexed the Jordan valley, the international border of Jordan, expelling any ‘locals’ inhabiting that land. It speaks with a viper’s tongue over the multiple amputee of Palestine whose head shall soon be severed from its body in the name of justice, peace and security.
Through the home demolitions, the assaults on civil society that attempted to cast Palestinian history and culture into a chasm of oblivion; through the unspeakable destruction of the refugee camp sieges and infrastructure bombardments of the second Intifada, through assassinations and summary executions, past the grandiose farce of disengagement and up to the nullification of free, fair and democratic Palestinian elections Israel has made its view known again and again in the strongest possible language, the language of military might, of threats, intimidation, harassment, defamation and degradation.
Israel, with the unconditional and approving support of the United States, has made it dramatically clear to the entire world over and over and over again, repeating in action after action that it will accept no viable Palestinian state next to its borders. What will it take for the rest of us to hear? What will it take to end the criminal silence of the ‘international community’? What will it take to see past the lies and indoctrination to what is taking place before us day after day in full view of the eyes of the world? The more horrific the actions on the ground, the more insistent are the words of peace. To listen and watch without hearing or seeing allows the indifference, the ignorance and complicity to continue and deepens with each grave our collective shame.
The destruction of Gaza has nothing to do with Hamas. Israel will accept no authority in the Palestinian territories that it does not ultimately control. Any individual, leader, faction or movement that fails to accede to Israel’s demands or that seeks genuine sovereignty and the equality of all nations in the region; any government or popular movement that demands the applicability of international humanitarian law and of the universal declaration of human rights for its own people will be unacceptable for the Jewish State. Those dreaming of one state must be forced to ask themselves what Israel would do to a population of 4 million Palestinians within its borders when it commits on a daily, if not hourly basis, crimes against their collective humanity while they live alongside its borders? What will suddenly make the raison d’etre, the self-proclaimed purpose of Israel’s reason for being change if the Palestinian territories are annexed to it outright?
The lifeblood of the Palestinian National Movement flows through the streets of Gaza today. Every drop that falls waters the soil of vengeance, bitterness and hatred not only in Palestine but across the Middle East and much of the world. We do have a choice over whether or not this should continue. Now is the time to make it.
Jennifer Loewenstein is the Associate Director of the Middle East Studies Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She can be reached at amadea311@earthlink.net
http://www.counterpunch.org/loewenstein01012009.html
Deze analyse zult u niet via de Nederlandse commerciele massamedia vernemen, het past niet in de officiele voorstelling van zaken die de 'vrije pers' dag in dag uit probeert te verkopen. Tevergeefs zoals we weten door peilingen waaruit blijkt dat Israel door westerse burgers steeds meer gezien wordt voor wat het is, een van de grootste bedreigingen van de wereldvrede.
Zie http://stanvanhoucke.blogspot.com/2010/01/de-israelische-terreur-1119.html
Ondertussen is voor elk zinnig mens duidelijk dat de nauwe samenwerking met de schurkenstaat Israel de positie van Europa verzwakt. Iedereen weet dat, dus ook onze politici. En toch accepteren ze dit als een voldongen feit, net zo voldongen als de Israelische diefstal van Palestijns land.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten