zaterdag 21 april 2007

Verarmd Uranium 7


'Soldier Health Scare Back in News
By Audrey Parente
Daytona Beach News Journal

Lori Brim cradled her son in her arms for three months before he died at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.
Dustin Brim, a 22-year-old Army specialist had collapsed three years ago in Iraq from a very aggressive cancer that attacked his kidney, caused a mass to grow over his esophagus and collapsed a lung.
The problems she saw during her time at Walter Reed, including her son screaming in pain while doctors argued over medications, had nothing to do with mold and shabby conditions documented in recent news reports. What this mother saw was an unexplainable illness consuming her son.
And what she has learned since her son's death is that his was not an isolated case.
Lori Brim has joined other parents, hundreds of other sick soldiers, legislators, research scientists and environmental activists who say the cause of their problems results from exposure to depleted uranium, a radioactive metal used in the manufacture of U.S. tank armor and weapon casings.
Health and environmental effects of depleted uranium are at the heart of scientific studies, a lawsuit in the New York courts and legislative bills in more than a dozen states (although not in Florida).
News stories claiming negative signs of depleted uranium's impact, including death and birth defects, are surfacing from Australia to England to the Far East. The controversy rages within government bodies and underlies the theme of TV shows like a recent episode of the medical series "House."
While the military continues to deny the connection of depleted uranium to sicknesses plaguing returning servicemen and women, a newly mandated study stemming from legislation signed by President Bush in October is just getting under way.'
De Nederlandse regering en de meerderheid van onze volksvertegenwoordigers steunen het gebruik van verarmd uranium wapens, zowel door de Amerikanen en Britten als door de eigen Koninklijke Luchtmacht. Dit wapen kan geen onderscheid maken tussen combattanten en non-combattanten en is dus in strijd met het internationaal recht. De inzet ervan is in wezen een oorlogsmisdaad, net als het gebruik van gifgas.

Geen opmerkingen: