The Dutch debate on Syria at the parliament, where it was not about war crimes conducted in Syria, but administrative errors
Yesterday the debate was held in the Dutch parliament about Syria, the support they gave to the so-called Syrian Rebels and their alleged warcrimes. First of all a few personal reflections, on the debate.
Right after the debate had started you could notice, how divided the Netherlands is. I would almost call it a sectarian partition of the so-called Dutch society and politics. For non-Dutch citizens it would look like an urealistic clownish theater show, with many political parties with their own sectarian agenda , how could one expect to compromise and how can you expect that they have any “human” feeling, with the Syrian people? They are pre-occupied with their own rules of power and bureaucracy, only care about rules (complicated ones) and not speaking about people, but “lessons to be learned”, if the second WW wasn’t bad enough or Sebrenica, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Yemen, these people, who call themselves politicians and people’s representatives, only care for their own small group of people and unable to govern a country on ethics and humanity, the only common factor, or common ground, is money and taxes and that is about it! A political multinational, based on so-called “democracy prinicipals, they once read, long time ago, in books of the old Greek philosphers and constantly use and misuse this word”. It turned out to be a bunch of opinions unable to govern in a humanistic way. There was only one or two Parliament member who stood above the sectarian issue which downplayed in the parliament, that’s all!
The debate opened with, an example for sectarian rule, a representative of the Socialist Party, a representative from Kurdish origin, she straight away came in conflict with the representative of the pro-Turkish party called DENK. You can imagine the issue: the Kurdish MP brought up the murder on the people of Sheik Maqsood (Kurdish neighborhood in Aleppo), as if the whole of Syria and the warcrimes committed by Jihadist (still called rebels), is the only group together with Jabhat Al Shamiya who committed crimes, Jahbat Al Shamiya was and is part of the Levant group, but of course the groups investigated by the Dutch government are “top” and “state” secret.
For the Dutch readers, the only member of parliament with some sense and understanding is Thierry Baudet (Forum for Democracy)!
The Turks (DENK) clashed with the Socialist and the so-called Christian Party (Christen Unie), called DENK the long arm of Erdogan and the Socialist MP accused him being against the Kurds. After this half an hour of ridiculous accusations towards eachother it was getting worse upon worse.
The so-called social-democrats (PvdA), is the most dumbest party of all, when it comes to foreign affairs (a master class English would help them a lot) the same mantra they keep repeating for years and years: Assad murders his own people, he is a dictator and murderer. No conversation or debate can be held with these so-called Social political parties, like PvdA or the Green Party, who (Green Party) only cares about refugees and loves the White Helmets.
This mantra applies for D’66 (Democrats 66), the party of the “Fake news” issue and end-of-life-principles, a corrupt leader called Alexander Pechtold, who bashes Women and get nice presents: “appartment” from “friends”. The minister of Trade is Siegrid Kaag, ringing any bells ? Yes it’s her, the former head of the OPCW (investigating the alleged chemical attacks in Syria) and married to a High ranking Palestinian, called Anis al-Qaq, former Ambassador for Palestine and member of FATAH, she voted against the releasing of Ahed Tamimi, a teenager under 18 who was detained in an Israeli Prison, she is against a resolution, which asks for the release of minors in Israelian prisons, speaks no word about the weekly killing of children in Gaza (the Great March of Return) she should, to my opnion divorce Anis al-Qaq, or leave parliament, there is no (political) justification for this!
During the debate the following news came in:
The Netherlands is granting asylum to the White helmets, a.k.a., Al-Queda. Maybe five families will come, details are not known, as usual, state-secret!
On the contrary, Minister Stef Blok ( the Minister of Foreign affairs, not a very adequate minister put in the wrong position) said that he would stop financing the White HeImets, because, they could not verify this group! Double standards and misleading information by the Dutch government!
So, I would do an urgent call on Syrians, who are in favour of the Syrian government, Christians and Alawites in the Netherlands, refugees or asylumseekers to return to Syria or a real safe country, eastern Europe and Russia, they are terrorists and killed many people in Syria, better to leave Europe at least the Netherlands, because, it will not be a safe place…The war has come to Europe, we hear it in parliament, sectarian issues, granting asylum to Al-Queda, a.k.a., White Helmets,who killed many of Syrians, Alwites, Christians and secular!
Conclusion of the Debate
A majority of the parliament wants an external and independent investigation into the support that the Netherlands have provided to various armed groups, called the Syrian rebels.
Government parties: VVD, CDA, D66, CU, GroenLinks, PvdA and SGP want the Advisory Committee on International Law Issues (CAVV) and the Advisory Council on International Affairs (AIV) to carry out the investigation.
The other parties: SP, PVV, FVD, Partij van de Dieren, 50+ wanted the government to leave, because of, misleading information and involment of Human Rights violations and conducting an illegal war on a sovereign country!
The research should focus on support in Syria, but should also lead to a new procedure with stricter rules for supporting armed groups abroad.
The parliament debated Tuesday evening with Minister Stef Blok (Foreign Affairs) about a program that the Netherlands started in 2015. Syrian so-called rebels fighting against the government of President Bashar Al Assad and provided so-called non-lethal support. Which according to various experts is against International Law and there was no mandate from the UN. It has costs thousands of Syria their live and distrupted families and country.
Three questions were central to the debate
- Was the selection of combat groups carried out correctly
- Has the control of the support been adequate
- Does the support fit within the framework of international law.
Ofcourse, no word about the humanitary catastrophy, upon which the Dutch government would be guilty of, if proven so by the above mentioned questions. No word about entering a war, illegally, bombing raids on innocent Syrians who lost their lives, of the killing spree of the Ducth F-16 fighters who dropped bombs in Syria! Collatoral damage they call it. I call it killing of innocent citizens by a precise plan, murder of citizens and soldiers trying to protect their country from extremists, there is no administrative excuse for attocities, that we know from WWII!
That’s all folks from the Dutchies!
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten