Why peace in Palestine-Israel is unattainable
By Jamal Kanj
But for the chap from Khan Younis refugee camp in Gaza who emerged earlier this week as the winner of the Arab Idol, the news from Palestine is grim.
The newly appointed Palestinian prime minister resigned and Israel still insists it should be able to negotiate over dividing the pie while it continues to eat it.
By the end of April, US Secretary of State John Kerry succeeded in tailoring another peace plan to entice Israel. Arab ministers supposedly agreed to amend a decade-old peace plan to satisfy Israeli demand for legalizing major illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank.
In May 2009, Israel responded to the US-mediated overture by issuing permits to build 296 illegal new homes in the Jews-only colony of Beit El near Ramallah. This week the secretary of state was scheduled to arrive on his fifth visit since February in an attempt to restart the Palestinian and Israeli negotiation.
Instead of addressing Israel’s inflexibility, the US is appeasing it with an economic package worth 4 billion US dollars of private American and European investment.
The visit seems to be on hold to give time to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to consider a new US economic peace plan and for Israel to give Abbas a face-saving cover to return to the negotiation table.
Israel is already sending mixed messages.
According to news reports that have appeared in Israeli daily Ma’ariv, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is considering a token gesture of releasing a small number of Palestinian prisoners and to issue a temporary freeze “outside the settlement blocks” in the West Bank.
The deceptive “freeze” may force Abbas to succumb to American pressure while Netanyahu can claim – and rightly so – it is irrelevant as building inside the Jews-only “settlement blocks” will continue.
Affirming its real intention and to pre-empt Kerry’s renewed efforts – in what is becoming traditional embarrassment for visiting US officials – the Israeli government issued earlier this month plans to build more than 1,000 new Jews-only homes in two West Bank colonies.
Instead of addressing Israel’s inflexibility, the US is appeasing it with an economic package worth 4 billion US dollars of private American and European investment.
In fact the new American “economic peace” is a repackaged Netanyahu plan from the 1990s, which was intended to dodge tackling the most pressing issues in the peace talk.
In theory, the proposal would expand the Palestinian economy by 50 per cent over three years while granting Israel more time to finish eating the “pie”.
But in reality, past investments were undermined by Israeli closures and military checkpoints or even destroyed, as happened with Gaza’s air and sea ports, leaving Palestinians with false promises and the only measurable expansion was in the size of Jewish colonies.
…past investments were undermined by Israeli closures and military checkpoints or even destroyed, as happened with Gaza’s air and sea ports, leaving Palestinians with false promises and the only measurable expansion was in the size of Jewish colonies.
To bolster Israel’s arrogance, two weeks ago the US House of Representatives passed the National Defence Authorization Act in which it delegated, for the first time in US history, the power to wage war to a foreign entity when it committed the US to avail “diplomatic, military, and economic support” to Israel should it decide to strike Iran.
Along with that vote, and at a time when both sides of the isle wrangled over how much more to cut from the defence budget, the US Congress was united in tripling President Barack Obama’s request to finance Israeli missile defence from 96 million to 284 million dollars.
It is indisputable that this unqualified and subservient US support is directly responsible for Israel’s intransigence and the failure of the peace process. This was exemplified last week when Polish descendent and Israeli Economy Minister Naftali Bennett – a multi-millionaire who renounced his US citizenship – declared on 17 June the death of the Palestinian state idea, adding that he isn’t an occupier and that the West Bank is his “home”.
Also rejecting the Palestinian state idea, Danny Danon, the Israel’s deputy defence minister, was quoted in the Times of Israel as saying: “The international community can say whatever they want, and we can do whatever we want.” Israeli leaders can’t be more explicit in their rejection of a viable Palestinian state, making the talk about a settlement “freeze” meaningless and peace unattainable.
A version of this article was first published by the Gulf Daily News. The version here is published by permission of Jamal Kanj.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten