woensdag 7 april 2010

Obama 158

Dit schreef ik gisteren:



Wanneer Henk Hofland schrijft over een een 'vernietigende stok achter de deur' dan negeert hij een belangrijk gegeven waarop vele jaren geleden al de grote zwarte humanist en dichter Aimee Cesaire wees toen hij stelde dat 'the colonizer, who in order to ease his conscience gets into the habit of seeing the other man as an animal, accustoms himself to treating him like an animal, and tends objectively to transform himself into an animal... They thought they were only slaughtering Indians, or Hindus, or South Sea Islanders, or Africans. They have in fact overthrown, one after another, the ramparts behind which European civilization could have developed freely.'

Met andere woorden: Hofland vergeet dat als hij het internationaal recht terzijde schuift, hij dan het recht opoffert aan de politiek van het geweld. Vandaar dan ook dat hij kan spreken van een 'preventieve oorlog', terwijl hij in wezen een illegale 'agressie-oorlog' bedoelt. Het gevaar van het negeren van het recht is niet alleen door Cesaire helder verwoord maar recentelijk ook door Tony Judt toen hij schreef: 'how long will it be before we import such criteria into our domestic arrangements.' Als de macht in het buitenland erop mag meppen, waarom zou ze dan er van afzien om in eigen land geweld te gebruiken? Als het politiek opportuun kan zijn om een 'vernietigende stok achter de deur te houden' waarom zou die 'vernietigende stok' ook niet in eigen land kunnen worden gebruikt? Het zijn allemaal problemen die Hofland en soortgelijke opiniemakers verzwijgen. Recht is voor hen wanneer het erop aankomt kennelijk het recht van de sterkste, van degene met de grootste knuppel. Het is een uitzichtloze weg die uiteindelijk tot zelfvernietiging leidt. Om dat te voorkomen is nu juist het recht in leven geroepen. Een samenleving die om de haverklap geweld toepast gaat aan het eigen geweld ten onder, zo leert ons de geschiedenis. Hoe vernietigender 'de stok' des te makkelijker de ondergang van de samenleving.


'How long will it be before we import such criteria into our domestic arrangements.' Welnu, vandaag werd bekend:


Obama Administration Authorizes CIA to Kill US Citizen

by: Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: lancefisher, jacsonquerubin, orehouse727)

The White House has taken the unprecedented step of authorizing the CIA to kill a US citizen suspected of having ties to a Nigerian man who attempted to blow up a Detroit-bound jetliner last Christmas.

It is believed that Anwar al-Awlaki, a Muslim Cleric, who lives in Yemen, is the first US citizen the CIA has been sanctioned to target for assassination under a policy implemented by the Bush administration that has since been embraced by the Obama administration.

George W. Bush signed a classified intelligence finding that authorized the CIA and the military after 9/11 to target and kill Americans abroad who were suspected of carrying out terrorist plots against the United States or US interests and posed an imminent threat.

Former government officials insisted that no Americans were ever placed on the Bush-era list. In November 2002, however, a CIA Predator drone armed with Hellfire missiles targeted a car driving through the desert in Yemen. The strike killed six alleged al-Qaeda operatives, one of whom was an American citizen, Kamal Derwish, who the CIA knew was in the car along with Abu Ali al-Harithi, one of the planners of the attack on the USS Cole in 2000 and the CIA's target.

Derwish was associated with an alleged terrorist cell in a Buffalo, New York, suburb known as the Lackawanna Six. Dick Cheney had pressured George W. Bush and other top administration officials to deploy US soldiers to the arrest the suspected terrorists in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally prohibits the armed forces from acting in a law enforcement capacity.

Awlaki had previously been placed on a separate, top-secret assassination list maintained by the US military's Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), which means he's now a military and CIA target.

An unnamed US official told The Washington Post Awlaki "recently became an operational figure for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula," where Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was allegedly radicalized.

"He's working actively to kill Americans, so it's both lawful and sensible to try to stop him," the unnamed US official told the Post. Another US official who spoke to the Post on condition of anonymity said Awlaki is in "everybody's sights."

An unnamed US official told The New York Times, "the danger Awlaki poses to [the United States] is no longer confined to words. He's gotten involved in plots."

"The United States works, exactly as the American people expect, to overcome threats to their security, and this individual - through his own actions - has become one. Awlaki knows what he's done, and he knows he won't be met with handshakes and flowers. None of this should surprise anyone," the US official said.

But the intelligence on Awlaki, who was born in New Mexico and was an imam at mosques in several US cities before returning to Yemen in 2004, is far from a slam dunk. Intelligence agencies had previously considered him to be nothing more than a cleric with radical views about Islam.

The assessment changed after Army Maj. Nidal Hassan, a psychiatrist, allegedly shot and killed 12 soldiers and one civilian at Fort Hood in Texas last November. Hassan had communicated with Awlaki via email, law enforcement authorities said, but he isn't suspected of planning the massacre.

A month later, after Abdulmutallab's failed attempt to blow up a Northwest Airlines jetliner, US intelligence officials revealed the Nigerian was a student of Awlaki's in Yemen, but the cleric denied he ordered the attack. The Los Angeles Times then reported in January that the CIA was working to add Awlaki to a list of about two dozen people targeted for assassination.

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley said in February, "it is one thing to kill an American in the course of a terrorist act or to prevent an imminent attack. It is quite another thing to kill someone suspected of terrorism without a trial. That would amount to the assassination of a citizen."
"As reaffirmed in cases like Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), American citizens have the same protections regardless of whether they are without or outside of the country," Turley said. "In that case, two American women who murdered their husbands on American military bases abroad were given the same protections under the Fifth Amendment regardless of the fact that they were located and committed the crimes abroad. If a president can kill U.S. citizens abroad, why not within the United States? What is the limiting principle beyond the practicalities?"

According to The Los Angeles Times, "new targets are drafted by analysts in the CIA's Counter-Terrorism Center. Former officials said analysts typically submit several new names each month to high-level officials, including the CIA general counsel and sometimes Director Leon E. Panetta."

The New York Times noted that as a general principle, international law permits the use of lethal force against individuals and groups that pose an imminent threat to a country, and officials said that was the standard used in adding names to the list of targets.

Moreover, according to The New York Times, "Congress approved the use of military force against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. People on the target list are considered to be military enemies of the United States and therefore not subject to the ban on political assassination first approved by President Gerald R. Ford."

Rep. Jane Harman, the powerful California Democrat who chairs the House of Representatives Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, told Reuters Tuesday that Awlaki is "probably the person, the terrorist, who would be terrorist No. 1 in terms of threat against us."

Former President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and numerous officials from the previous administration made near identical claims about the importance of Abu Zubaydah, the high-value detainee who was alleged to be the No.2 person in al-Qaeda and one of the planners of 9/11.

As Truthout first reported last week, the government no longer contends Zubaydah, who was brutally tortured, was an "official" member of al-Qaeda nor had prior knowledge of or was involved in the planning of 9/11 as Bush, Cheney, and others asserted.

Harman conceded that Awlaki's US citizenship "certainly complicated" his placement on a list of approved assassination targets. Still, she said President Barack Obama "made very clear that people, including Americans who are trying to attack our country, are people we will definitely pursue ... are targets of the United States."

Dennis Blair, the director of National Intelligence, admitted at a House Intelligence Committee hearing in February that the CIA can assassinate Americans abroad suspected of being involved in terrorism.

"If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that," Blair said, adding that the criteria to be targeted for assassination includes "whether that American is involved in a group that is trying to attack us, whether that American is a threat to other Americans."

"Those are the factors involved," Blair said. "We don't target people for free speech. We target them for taking action that threatens Americans or has resulted in it."


http://www.truthout.org/obama-administration-authorizes-cia-kill-us-citizen58358

1 opmerking:

Paul zei

An unnamed US official told The New York Times, "the danger Awlaki poses to [the United States] is no longer confined to words. He's gotten involved in plots."

Een zelfde lot zou de pres. van afghanistan wel eens kunnen treffen,na zijn uitlatingen.
Karzai threatens to join the Taliban
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0405/joke-karzai-threatens-join-taliban/

Da's nou toevallig...
http://zaplog.nl/zaplog/article/afghaanse_president_karzai_verslaafd_aan_opium/
Hamid Karzai, de Afghaanse president, heeft ze niet meer allemaal op een rijtje en is verslaafd aan opium en/of heroïne. Volgens Peter Galbraith, voormalig ambassadeur van de Verenigde Naties (VN) in Afghanistan, is Karzai erg emotioneel en uit balans. Een gemoedstoestand die alleen te verklaren is door een drugsprobleem.

Willy van Damme: Het einde van het Europees expansionisme

  Willy Van Damme's Weblog Zoeken Hoofdmenu home Buitenland Binnenland Lokaal Media Opinie etc Berichtnavigatie ←  Vorige Het einde van ...