Tomgram: Will Today's U.S.-Armed Ally Be Tomorrow's Enemy?
[Note for TomDispatch Readers: In the past weeks, you could catch original pieces by Barbara Ehrenreich, Arundhati Roy, Pepe Escobar, Michael Klare, Ann Jones, and Rebecca Solnit, among others, at this website. It's the sort of line-up you might otherwise find at a top-notch magazine. Every piece posted here is -- we hope -- original, well written, well edited, thoughtful, informative, and provocative.
Those of you who get email notices whenever a new piece is posted, as well as the tens of thousands who bookmark TomDispatch or read its pieces reposted elsewhere, can help get word out about the work we do by encouraging new readers to sign on. TD spreads mainly by word of mouth, a formidable force in the on-line world. For those of you already hooked, I want to suggest, as I do every few months, that you lend the site just a few minutes of your time and a little more of that word-of-mouth power. I hope you'll consider putting together a modest list of friends, colleagues, relatives, or, for that matter, people you like to argue with who might benefit from getting TomDispatch regularly. You should urge them to go to the "sign up" window at the upper right of the main screen, put in an e-mail address, answer the confirmation letter that will quickly arrive in their email boxes (or, fair warning, spam folders), and join the TD crew.
By the way, I'm most thankful for a recent spate of contributions to the site. To all of you who have availed yourselves of the "Resist Empire. Support TomDispatch" icon, also to the right of the main screen, many thanks, and the same to those of you who have clicked on a book link at the site, gone to Amazon, and made a purchase of any sort (of which, no matter what it is, we get a tiny cut). Every bit of support helps, believe me -- and we're appreciative. Tom]
Who's Next?
Lessons from the Long War and a Blowback World
By Tom Engelhardt
Is it too early -- or already too late -- to begin drawing lessons from "the Long War"? That phrase, coined in 2002 and, by 2005, being championed by Centcom Commander General John Abizaid, was meant to be a catchier name for George W. Bush's "Global War on Terror." That was back in the days when inside-the-Beltway types were still dreaming about a global Pax Americana and its domestic partner, a Pax Republicana, and imagining that both, once firmly established, might last forever.
"The Long War" merely exchanged the shock-'n'-awe geographical breadth of the President Bush's chosen moniker ("global") for a shock-'n'-awe time span. Our all-out, no-holds-barred struggle against evil-doers would be nothing short of generational as well as planetary. From Abizaid's point of view, perhaps a little in-office surgical operation on the nomenclature of Bush's war was, in any case, in order at a time when the Iraq War was going disastrously badly and the Afghan one was starting to look more than a little peaked as well. It was like saying: Forget that "mission accomplished" sprint to victory in 2003 and keep your eyes on the prize. We're in it for the long slog.
When Bush officials and Pentagon brass used "the long war" -- a phrase that never gained much traction outside administration circles and admiring think tanks -- they were (being Americans) predicting the future, not commenting on the past. In their view, the fight against the Islamist terrorists and assorted bad guys who wanted to get their hands on weapons of mass destruction and truly bloody the American nose would be decades long.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten