zondag 28 december 2008

Obama 72

'Obama v. Richard Falk on Israel and Occupied Palestine -
Written by Stephen Lendman
Obama leaves no ambiguity where he stands. From public statements, campaign pledges, policy advisors, and war cabinet selections, his positions affirm:
— one-sided pro-Israeli zealotry;
— continued Palestinian oppression;
— no end to the Iraq war and occupation;
— possibly attacking Iran and/or allying with Israel to do it;
— pursuing an imperial agenda; targeting Pakistan, Russia and other countries;
— expanding the size of the military; increasing expenditures for it; and
— providing Israel annually with billions of dollars; the latest weapons and technology; the same zero interest rate loans Wall Street gets; liberal debt forgiveness; virtually anything Israel requests on the pretext of security, to wage aggressive war, or expand its illegal settlements; and
— acquiescing and remaining silent after Israel insulted a high UN official by harassing and detaining him, then expelling him from the country
.


Last March, Richard Falk replaced John Dugard as the UN Human Rights Council's (UNHRC) Special Rapporteur on Occupied Palestine. UNHRC is mandated:
— to promote and protect human rights globally;
— detect and speak out objectively against violations and violators;
— "provide a forum for identifying, highlighting and developing responses to today's human rights challenges,
— act as the principal focal point of human rights research, education, public information, and advocacy activities in the United Nations system," and
— respect the rights of everyone irrespective of nationality, ethnicity, race, gender, language, age, or religion "as stipulated in the United Nations Charter."Navanethem Pillay became Human Rights High Commissioner last July. Richard Falk has regional responsibility for Occupied Palestine. On December 14, he arrived at Ben Gurion airport, Tel Aviv to perform his assigned duties. He led a three-person mission that intended to visit the West Bank and Gaza, assess conditions on the ground, then report on Israel's compliance with human rights standards and international humanitarian law. Israel was informed of his trip, his itinerary, individuals he planned to meet with, and issued visas for himself, a staff security person, and an assistant. Falk had no reason to expect interference, and as he put it: "I would not have made the long journey from California, where I live, had I not been reasonably optimistic about my chances of getting in." Nonetheless, he was denied entry and harassed as follows:— despite his UN status, he was put in a holding room with about 20 others experiencing entry problems;— then "treated not as a UN representative, but as some sort of security threat, subjected to an inch-by-inch body search and the most meticulous luggage inspection I have ever witnessed;"— separated from his two UN companions; they were allowed entry and taken to the airport facility about a mile away;— required to put his luggage and cell phone in a room, then taken to a "locked tiny room that smelled of urine and filth;"— five other detainees were with him in very cramped, uncomfortable quarters;— he was confined there for the next 15 hours, "which amounted to a cram course on the miseries of prison life, including dirty sheets, inedible food and lights that were too bright or darkness controlled from the guard office;"— Israel's "obvious intention (was) to teach me, and more significantly, the UN a lesson: there will be no cooperation with those who make strong criticisms of Israel's occupation policy."Israel accuses Falk of bias for making inflammatory comments about its occupation of Palestine. He rejects the charge and asserts that, like his predecessor John Dugard (whom Israel earlier assailed) he assesses facts and relevant law truthfully. "It is the character of the occupation that gives rise to sharp criticism of Israel's approach," especially its collective punishment of 1.5 million Gazans under siege. Although denied entry and expelled, Falk insists that he'll continue "to use all available means to document the realities of the Israeli occupation" and report as fully and truthfully on them as possible.He's mandated to assess conditions on the ground, prepare detailed reports on what he finds, keep the UN fully informed, the public worldwide as well, and recommend ways of remediating violations. As an international law expert, he's eminently qualified for the task.Since assuming his post in May, he's been denied entry into Israel and Occupied Palestine. On August 25, he submitted his first report covering the first half of 2008. He criticized the deteriorating human rights conditions for Palestinians, called Israel's violations grave, singled out the Gaza siege and a crackdown on free expression and peaceful assembly.Earlier this year, Israel denied a Bishop Desmond Tutu-headed UNHRC mission entry as well. He was delegated to investigate the Israeli occupation force November 2006 Beit Hanoun massacre, an appalling act of mass murder killing 18 civilians (including seven children and six women) and wounding 53 others. The mission had to enter Gaza from the Egyptian side through the Rafah International Crossing Point, but even that way is rarely easy.Other international delegations have been obstructed as well, including diplomats, humanitarian workers, and journalists. Last November, the IDF stopped an EU one and one other comprised of 20 representatives of international organizations seeking entry into Gaza. Israel is extremely brazen, so far with no world community condemnation of its practices.As a UN member and signatory to various human rights conventions, it must honor their mandates. Nonetheless, it doesn't as well as much other international law and UN resolutions going back to the 1947 General Assembly Partition Plan (Resolution 181). It divided Palestine 56 - 44% for Israel. When Arabs were nearly 70% of the population, Jews got most of the fertile land, nearly all urban and rural territory, 400 of over 1000 Palestinian villages, but it wasn't enough. After Israel's 1948 "War of Independence," it secured 78% of Mandatory Palestine, expelled or killed about 800,000 Palestinians, destroyed 531 of their villages, 11 urban neighborhoods, and committed grievous crimes of war and against humanity. They've been documented and included:— cold-blooded massacres of civilian men, women, children, the elderly and infirm;— destruction of homes, villages and crops;— mass instances of rape; and— other atrocities on a vast scale.'

1 opmerking:

Sonja zei

"All of us are concerned about the impact of closed border crossings on Palestinian families. However, we have to understand why Israel is forced to do this," schreef Obama in een brief aan de Amerikaanse VN ambassadeur Khalilzad. "Israel has the right to respond while seeking to minimize any impact on civilians."

In Obama's logica werd Israël gisteren gedwongen om een van de dichtst bevolkte gebieden ter wereld vanuit de lucht te bombarderen en honderden mensen te doden. Maxime Verhagen zei gisteren niet toevallig hetzelfde - via een woordvoerder.

In 2002 publiceerde Richard Sale, correspondent voor UPI, een artikel over de Israëlische relatie met Hamas.
Israel and Hamas may currently be locked in deadly combat, but, according to several current and former U.S. intelligence officials, beginning in the late 1970s, Tel Aviv gave direct and indirect financial aid to Hamas over a period of years.
Israel "aided Hamas directly -- the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance to the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization)," said Tony Cordesman, Middle East analyst for the Center for Strategic Studies.
Israel's support for Hamas "was a direct attempt to divide and dilute support for a strong, secular PLO by using a competing religious alternative," said a former senior CIA official.
Lees hele artikel
Ook volgens Zeev Sternhell*, geschiedkundige van the Hebrew University in Jeruzalem, en winnaar van de Israel Prize in februari 2008, werd Ahmad Yassin door premier Golda Meir en haar regering gesteund om een tegenwicht te vormen tegen de PLO. Toen hij niet meer bruikbaar was werd hij in 2004 door Israël vermoord.

Dat wil dus zeggen dat Israël's nemesis, Hamas, van eigen fabrikaat is.

*)Ook bekend van de recente bomaanslag op zijn leven voor zijn huis in Jeruzalem, vermoedelijk door "rechtse extremisten" cq kolonisten.