Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

vrijdag 25 juli 2014

Zionist Fascism 75


Morgen hangt op alle gebouwen van de overheid de vlag halfstok. Ook worden op verschillende momenten klokken geluid: nos.nl/l/678095
22 jul.

Premier Rutte heeft woensdag 23 juli uitgeroepen tot dag van nationale rouw.

Wat voor leger is het dat kinderen vermoordt? Eenderde van de Palestijnse slachtoffers is kind en de conclusie kan geen andere zijn dan dat het Joods-Israelische leger net zo laf is als het zionistische politieke regime, gesteund door de westerse pro-Israel lobby en haar 'democratisch' gekozen volksvertegenwoordiging. Er heerst grote verontwaardiging en woede over een fout van Oekraïense separatisten die een burgervliegtuig neerschoten, terwijl op precies hetzelfde moment het vermoorden van Palestijnse burgers in het concentratiekamp Gaza door het Westen wordt gesteund en door sommigen zelfs wordt toegejuicht. Een dag rouw voor de slachtoffers van een fout, en geen seconde stilte voor de honderdduizenden door het Westen veroorzaakte slachtoffers in Irak, Afghanistan, Libië, Syrië, Oekraïne, etc, waar de westerse plutocratie een 'regime change' met grootscheeps geweld probeert te forceren. Ronduit weerzinwekkend is de hypocrisie in het opportunistische polderland nu Nederlanders slachtoffer zijn geworden van de gewelddadige chaos die de Europese Unie en de Verenigde Staten in Oekraïne hebben veroorzaakt. Miljarden hebben de NAVO-lidstaten besteedt aan de gewelddadige verdrijving van de democratisch gekozen regering van dit Oost-Europese land en om zodoende Rusland politiek buiten spel te zetten en nog verder te omsingelen met NAVO-bases. De veronderstelling dat deze neoliberale realpolitiek voor de westerling geen consequenties zal opleveren, en dat alleen burgers buiten Europa de dupe zullen blijven, is op niets gebaseerd. Het westerse geweld wordt steeds minder geaccepteerd als normaal, en sinds 11 september 2001 kan iedereen met een beetje verstand beseffen dat de aloude westerse hegemonie niet meer onaanvechtbaar is. Zelfs de zelfbenoemde kleinburgerlijke 'politiek-literaire elite' in Nederland en de bevolking in het algemeen zal moeten leren dat als er in hun naam elders geweld wordt gepleegd — massaal geweld dat zij als de normale gang van zaken zijn gaan beschouwen — hun misdadige houding niet langer meer consequentieloos zal blijven. Vanuit Zuid-Europa waar ik nu ben, kijk ik met verwondering naar de hysterie van de Nederlanders die altijd zo prat gaan op hun nuchtere houding van doe maar normaal dan doe je al gek genoeg. De doden van het vliegtuig-ongeval zijn tragisch, maar niet minder tragisch zijn de Palestijnse doden van het zionistisch fascisme in Gaza. Zolang de Nederlandse burger de steun van zijn eigen regering aan de Joods-Israelische terreur blijft accepteren, bezit hij niet het morele recht om een fout van anderen te veroordelen. De propagandistische berichtgeving van de polder mainstream media die lezers van mijn weblog mij doorsturen is schrikbarend. Mijn collega's gebruiken de taal als gif, net zoals de nazi's destijds deden. Victor Klemperer, die vanwege zijn joodse achtergrond de nazi's moest vrezen, bestudeerde hun taal en concludeerde over 'Language as Poison' in Lingua tertii imperii.(1947):
it’s not simply that language composes poetry and thinks for me, it also drives my feelings, it directs my entire spiritual being, the more self-evidently, the more unconsciously I give myself up to it. So what happens when the language of the educated is composed of poisonous elements, or bears poisons? Words may be little doses of arsenic: they are consumed without being noticed; they seem at first to have no effect, but after a while, indeed, the effect is there. After a while when one uses the word 'fanatical' for 'heroic' or 'virtuous,' he actually comes to believe that a fanatic is a virtuous hero; that without fanaticism one can not be heroic. The words 'fanatical' and 'fanaticism' were not created by the Third Reich, but it did transform the essential meaning of these words and it made more frequent use of them in a single day than in other times they would have been used in a course of years… It is more than just the stuff of a schoolhouse pedant to expose the poison of the language of the Third Reich and to warn about it. When a believing Jew believes that a piece of tableware has been used in a ritually impure way, then he will bury it in the earth in order to purify it. In the same way the many words which were placed in common linguistic usage by the Nazis must be placed in a mass grave for a long time, and some of them forever.


Gezien het werk van de commerciële massamedia dienen woorden als 'democratie' en 'mensenrechten' te worden begraven, aangezien ze vandaag de dag precies het tegenovergestelde zijn geworden van wat ze ooit eens betekenden. Laat al die brave burgers die zich slachtoffer voelen, zichzelf de vraag stellen: 'Wat voor leger is het dat kinderen vermoordt? En waarom steun ik dit als rechtschapen burger?'



Israeli strike on Gaza school kills 15 and leaves 200 wounded

UN condemns shelling of UNRWA school, saying it asked IDF for time to evacuate civilians, which was not given

• Gaza crisis: Israeli strike kills at least 15 – live updates

Could not load plugins:
File not found
Link to video: Gaza hospital overwhelmed with survivors of Israeli strike on UN shelter
International scrutiny of Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip intensified on Thursday when more than 15 Palestinians were killed and 200 injured in a strike on a UN school in northern Gaza crowded with hundreds of displaced civilians.
Most of the injured were women and children. Among the dead was a mother and her one-year-old baby. UN staff had been attempting to organise the school's evacuation when the attack took place.
Ban Ki-moon, secretary general of the UN, condemned the attack, which came hours after the agency had warned that Israel's actions in the Palestinian enclave could constitute war crimes. "Today's attack underscores the imperative for the killing to stop and to stop now," Ban said.
The Israeli military first claimed, in a text sent to journalists, that the school could have been hit by Hamas missiles that fell short. Later, a series of tweets from the Israel Defence Forces appeared to confirm the deaths were the result of an Israeli strike.
"Today Hamas continued firing from Beit Hanoun. The IDF responded by targeting the source of the fire."
"Last night, we told Red Cross to evacuate civilians from UNRWA's shelter in Beit Hanoun btw 10am & 2pm. UNRWA & Red Cross got the message. Hamas prevented civilians from evacuating the area during the window that we gave them."
Israel shells UN shelter in Beit HanounThe attack was condemned by Ban Ki-Moon, who said 'Today's attack underscores the imperative for the killing to stop and to stop now.' Photograph: Nidal Alwaheidi/Demotix/Corbis
Chris Gunness, spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works agency said there had earlier been "firing around the compound" and his organisation had asked the Israeli army for time to evacuate civilians. "We spent much of the day trying to negotiate or to coordinate a window so that civilians, including our staff, could leave. That was never granted … and the consequences of that appear to be tragic." Gunness said the Israeli military were supplied with coordinates of UN schools where those displaced were sheltering. UN sources told the Guardian a call was placed to the Israeli military at 10.55am requesting permission to evacuate but their call was not returned.
The deaths in Beit Hanoun raised the overall Palestinian death toll in the conflict that began on 8 July to at least 751. Israel has lost 32 soldiers – all since 17 July, when it widened its air campaign into a full-scale ground operation – and three civilians.
Israel shells Gaza schoolThe majority of those injured in the attack on the school were women and children. Photograph: Lefteris Pitarakis/AP
Hours after the attack, a trail of bloody footprints could be seen crossing a deserted playground littered with abandoned possessions. There were pools of blood both inside and outside the school building; more blood splashed over wooden school desks.
The Israeli military, which said it was "reviewing the incident", claimed the incident had occurred during "heavy combat" in the area and accused "terrorists" of "using civilian infrastructure and international symbols as human shields".
Although missiles belonging to Hamas and other armed Palestinian groups in Gaza do sometimes fall short, there was no visible evidence of debris from broken Palestinian rockets in the school. The injuries and the number of fatalities were consistent with a powerful explosion that sent shrapnel tearing through the air, in some cases causing traumatic amputations.
The surrounding neighbourhood bore evidence of multiple Israeli attacks, including smoke from numerous artillery rounds and air strikes. One building was entirely engulfed by flames.
Israel shells school in GazaThe attack happened as the playground was crowded with families waiting to be ferried to safety. Photograph: Adel Hana/AP
Thursday's assault on the school – one of the grimmest incidents of the war – occurred at about 2.50pm as the playground was crowded with families waiting to be ferried to safety. According to survivors, one shell landed in the schoolyard followed by several more rounds that hit the upper stories of the building.
Most of the wounded were moved initially to a local hospital where terrified women and children clung to each other, waiting for news of relatives. A shell exploded about 50 metres from the hospital building as they waited.
Nour Hamid, 17, was hoping for news of her sister. As she attempted to comfort her terrified nephew, she said: "We were packing up to leave when the attack happened. We were standing outside when they started hitting us, some of the women holding their babies. My sister-in-law was one of the injured. There were bodies everywhere, most of them women and children."
Laila al-Shinbari told Reuters: "All of us sat in one place when suddenly four shells landed on our heads … Bodies were on the ground, [there was] blood and screams. My son is dead and all my relatives are wounded including my other kids."
Sabah Kafarna, 35, had also been sheltering at the school. "At about 11.30 someone from the municipality came to tell us that we were going to be moved because it was too dangerous. But the buses didn't come. That's why [there were] so many people all outside when the shells landed," she said. "The shells came one after the other. I was inside by the windows when they smashed."
Ayman Hamdan, medical director at Beit Hanoun hospital, told the Guardian that medical staff were treating multiple shrapnel injuries and damage to internal organs. "Some of the bodies were blown apart. Such a massacre requires more than one hospital to deal with it," she said.
Gaza school playgroundThe playground of the school, filled with displaced families when the shell hit. Photograph: Sameh Rahmi/NurPhoto/Corbis
The dead were ferried along with the most seriously injured in a fleet of ambulances to the relative safety of the Kamal Adwan hospital in Beit Lahia. Frantic relatives crowded the morgue looking for loved ones. The hospital's emergency room was plunged into chaos as doctors struggled to cope with the influx.
One father, his white singlet stained with blood, sat on the floor cradling the body of his injured daughter as another relative held a drip above her. Two more children were brought in – one girl injured by shrapnel, and another body whose torso was covered in blood.
Several UN schools have come under fire in the last week. On Tuesday, a school in Maghazi, central Gaza, sheltering about 1,000 people, was hit by Israeli shells as an UNRWA team inspected damage caused by an earlier strike. Thursday's strike occurred during a day of heavy fighting across the territory as Israel pressed ahead with its operation to halt rocket fire from Gaza and destroy a sophisticated network of cross-border tunnels.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/24/israeli-strike-un-school-gaza-kills-women-children?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2

  1. Stan, Heb je dit gehoord op Radio 1? (ik hoop dat je het kunt horen) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euVxMUwpkDY&feature=share

  2. Ik hoop dat deze het wel doet. Ze weten wel wie ze moeten vragen bij radio 1. Wat een stelletje sukkels.

    Corrie

    http://www.radio1.nl/item/207625-De%20propaganda-oorlog%20op%20social%20media.html
    De strijd tussen Hamas en Israel wordt niet alleen op de grond uitgevochten maar wordt ook via sociale media verder opgevoerd. We kijken live mee en zien de meest gruwelijke foto's en filmpjes in onze timelines voorbij komen. Antropoloog Ginny Mooy noemt sociale media het slagveld van de propagandaoorlog . Zij is gespecialiseerd in extreme geweldpleging bij gewapende conflicten en social movements

  3. Zo wordt vandaag een VN-school in Gaza vol vluchtelingen geraakt door Israelische raketten, 15 doden en honderden gewonden,voornamelijk kinderen en vrouwen en doet staatsomroep NOS er kort kritiekloos verslag van eindigend met de woorden Hamas en Israel gaan gewoon door.........om vervolgens Israelische vrouwen ruimschoots aan 't wordt te laten hoe ze de Israelische soldaten vertroetelen............om misselijk van te worden. Een samenleving als Nederland moet wel erg ziek zijn dat niemand dit bekritiseerd..............

woensdag 23 juli 2014

Zionist Fascism 74

Hoe machtig de joodse lobby en de zionistische lobby in het Westen is blijkt uit het onderstaande bericht. Kennelijk mogen Palestijnse kinderen vermoord worden door de strijdkrachten van de zogeheten 'Joodse staat.' Alleen in totalitair bestuurde landen kan een dergelijke politiek massaal worden gesanctioneerd. 100 procent van de senatoren in de VS steunt het zionistisch fascism. Een veelzeggend percentage, waar de zelfs de nazi's en de sovjets niet toe in staat waren. Vrij spel bij het moorden in het concentratiekamp Gaza. De geschiedenis herhaalt zich. En ook de Nederlandse politici steunen het massaal:

Action Alert

On Friday, the US Senate voted 100-0 to support Israel's invasion of Gaza. So far, over 500 Palestinians have been killed. Your elected officials need to hear from you: stop funding this massacre.


Unconditional US support makes Israel's attack on Gaza possible.
Tell Obama and Congress: no US aid for human rights violations 


  

Dear Stan,
I’ve been waking up every morning to the latest news reports feeling outraged, heartbroken and speechless. I'm sure you have too.
This weekend was the bloodiest yet of Israel's assault on Gaza. 
On Sunday alone, some 100 Palestinians were killed, mostly civilians, and many of them children. 
As of this morning, the death count in Gaza has passed 500. But we can't stop this war on an imprisoned and occupied civilian population by simply asking the Israeli government nicely. 
We must apply real pressure— specifically the boycotts and divestment campaigns that we know are changing the political landscape.
And we must demand that the United States, Israel’s greatest ally and patron, stops the billions in unconditional funding, and diplomatic cover that make this all possible.
Last Friday the US Senate passed a resolution supporting Israel’s attack on Gaza by a vote of 100-0. A week earlier, the House of Representatives passed a similar resolution.
Worse, elected officials have been attending pro-war rallies all over the United States.
The U.S. has essentially given Israel carte blanche for this assault. And this extreme agenda doesn't only hurt Palestinians. It also undermines Israelis who are working for peace and justice.
But we’ve heard it countless times from DC insiders including members of Congress: they need to hear from us a lot more often, and more loudly, to feel safe going against the Israel Lobby.
You and I can hold corporations accountable through divestment and boycotts, but governments need to hold governments accountable.
Please, tell your elected officials we demand that they end the use of US aid to violate human rights and US law.
Just 3 days ago, together we mobilized more than 13,000 people to challenge NBC's decision to remove their most experienced Gaza correspondent – and helped get him reinstated. When we use our voices together, change happens.  
We must do everything we can to end this. Now.

Rebecca Vilkomerson
Executive Director

Zionist Fascism 73

"Blood on American Hands": Richard Falk on Palestine

Monday, 21 July 2014 13:03By CJ Polychroniou, Truthout | Interview
A man holds the body of a child during a burial for a family of seven people killed yesterday in an Israeli attack in the Shajaiya neighborhood of Gaza City, July 21, 2014. As the bloody conflict entered its 14th day amid diplomatic pressure for a cease-fire, the Palestinian death toll reached 500, and thousands of people streamed toward Gaza City from the north Monday. (Photo: Tyler Hicks / The New York Times)A man holds the body of a child during a burial for a family of seven people killed yesterday in an Israeli attack in the Shajaiya neighborhood of Gaza City, July 21, 2014. As the bloody conflict entered its 14th day amid diplomatic pressure for a cease-fire, the Palestinian death toll reached 500, and thousands of people streamed toward Gaza City from the north Monday. (Photo: Tyler Hicks / The New York Times)
For over 20 years, Israel and the United States have been working to separate Gaza from the West Bank, in violation of the Oslo Accords they had just signed declaring them to be an indivisible territorial unity. The latest carnage in Gaza is part of an ongoing Israeli imperial policy which, as Noam Chomsky wrote to me just a couple of days ago, seeks "to take over what's of value 'in the land of Israel,' reduce the population to marginal existence (with the usual neocolonial exception: an enclave for the rich and Westernized sectors in Ramallah), and if they leave, so much the better." But, as Richard Falk, Albert G. Milbank professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, former UN special rapporteur for Occupied Palestine,and author of the forthcoming book Palestine: The Legitimacy of Hopewhich will be published in October by Just World Books, underscores in this exclusive interview, Israel always claims that its attacks against Palestinians are provoked by the Palestinians themselves.
C.J. Polychroniou: Professor Falk, here we go again: Israel, one of the world's mightiest military powers, has launched yet another ground offensive into the Gaza Strip on the rather bogus proposition that Hamas provoked Israel to attack Gaza. What is Israel's real purpose in attacking Gaza this time around?
Richard Falk: I believe that Israel periodically "mows the grass" in Gaza as one right-wing Israeli advisor to Sharon distastefully expressed the goal of Israel policy toward Gaza several years ago. There were factors present in the context of this Israeli attack that help explain why now. The main two factors in my view were the unwelcome establishment of an interim "unity government" on June 2 by the leadership of Fatah and Hamas, which undermined the Israeli approach of keeping the governing authorities in the West Bank and Gaza as divided as possible. The second element was Israel's strong incentive to weaken Hamas in the West Bank so that Israel could justify its moves in April to end direct negotiations with the Palestinian Authority and move ever closer to incorporating the West Bank, or most of it into Israel, and fulfill the expansionist Zionist dream to move beyond the 1967 borders.
The June 12 kidnapping incident involving the three teenage settler children from the Gush Etzion settlement near Jerusalem provided the Netanyahu government with the pretext it needed to mount an anti-Hamas campaign that started as a supposed hunt for the perpetrators, detaining up to 500 suspected of a Hamas connection and generally imposing a variety of oppressive measures, including house demolition, lockdowns of Palestinian towns, and random violence that led to six Palestinian deaths. As has been shown, the incident was manipulated in a most cynical fashion by the government pretending to search for the kidnapped youth, while knowing that they were already dead, using public anxiety and anger to incite the Israeli citizenry to justify the oppressive tactics of the government and to create an atmosphere of vigilante vengeance.
Having denied any involvement in the kidnapping incident, it is hardly surprising that in retaliation for Israel's provocations that Hamas in retaliation began firing rockets at Israeli towns. Israel used its formidable propaganda machine to tell the world that its third major military assault on defenseless Gaza in the last five years (2008-09, 2012, 2014) was a defensive response to unprovoked rocket attacks. With mock innocence, Netanyahu told the world that Israel needed to act to protect its citizens from the rockets, without any mention, of course, of the prior anti-Hamas rampage that included ugly Israeli racist slurs directed at the Palestinians and revenge attacks on Palestinian children.
Why did the ceasefire negotiations in Cairo fail?
The ceasefire failed for several reasons. Hamas was excluded from the process leading up to the proposed ceasefire, and was informed only by the public media. Beyond this, the previously announced Hamas conditions for agreeing to a ceasefire were ignored: release of Palestinians who had been part of the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange three years ago (in which a single captured IDF soldier was released in exchange for the agreed Israeli release of 1,027 Palestinian prisoners) and were rearrested in recent weeks as part of the crackdown on Hamas; lifting the blockade and opening the crossings; cease interference with the unity government; restore the 2012 ceasefire. Also, Sisi's Egypt is hardly a suitable or trustworthy intermediary from Hamas' perspective. Not far in the background is the brutal repression of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and related hostility to Hamas, which is regarded by the Sisi government as an offshoot.
Would Israel have launched an attack if the new Egyptian government was not also bent on seeing Hamas destroyed?
This is a very speculative issue. Israel did initiate a major attack on Gaza in November 2012 while Mohamed Morsi was president despite his affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood, and did then accept a ceasefire arranged under Cairo's diplomatic auspices. Having General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi as president of Egypt is certainly a favorable development from Israel's perspective. Sisi has substantially destroyed the extensive tunnel network on which Hamas depended to receive needed supplies as well as to collect tax revenues required to administer Gaza. Egypt in recent months has been cooperating with Israel and the United States, including in relation to control of the passage through the Rafah crossing to Egypt, which is the only escape route available to the people of Gaza, including those needing medical attention only available in Cairo. I believe that the Israeli attack occurred at this time principally for reasons of Israeli state policy, and would have taken place without regard to the attitudes of the leadership in Cairo.
With 1.8 million people trapped in an overcrowded war zone, it should be obvious that the Israeli jets' attacks constitute a blatant violation of international humanitarian law. Yet, once again, Israel is allowed to get away with murder because it enjoys US diplomatic backing as well as US military and financial support. As such, doesn't this make the United States just as complicit in crimes against humanity as Israel itself?
I do agree that the United States for the reasons you give is definitely complicit in relation to the criminal nature of the Israeli attack. Whether this kind of complicity involves legal culpability, as well as moral and political complicity is an open question. The United States is not, so far as is known, directly involved in planning and carrying out this "aggression" against Gaza and "collective punishment" against its people. Giving military assistance or providing military equipment to a foreign government does not by itself constitute a sufficient connection with the attack as to satisfy legal tests of complicity.
What is clear is that the continuing and unconditional diplomatic support given by the US to Israel, including shielding Israel from formal censure at the UN, and the failure to discourage war crimes being committed, results in much blood on American hands. Activist opponents of this American policy are now more committed to calling upon churches and universities to divest from corporations doing business with the settlements or facilitating Israeli militarism, and there are increasing national and international calls for an arms embargo on Israel, which would be of mainly symbolic force, given Israel's robust arms industry, which is supplying weapons to many countries, with the grotesque selling point that they have been "field-tested," that is, used, in Gaza.
Hamas has been faced with a similar situation before, yet, every time it gets into a military confrontation with Israel, it seems to be emerging stronger than before. Should we expect things to be any different this time around?
It is difficult at this point to say. What the encounter did reveal was that Hamas and other militias in Gaza have a considerable supply of longer-range missiles able to strike any city in Israel, including Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. It also seems that Israel's reliance on air attacks and naval shelling was not able to curtail the numbers of rockets being fired. True, despite firing more than 1,000 rockets, no Israeli has yet been killed by a Palestinian rocket (apparently the only Israeli so far killed died from a mortar shell fired from Gaza while he was rushing to a shelter, an option Gazans do not have) [as of interview conducted on July 19]. At the same time, the psychological and political effects of being unable to stop the launch of rockets has damaged Israeli prestige, and may push it to pursue more ambitious goals than destroying tunnels into Israel from Gaza, the stated objective of Operation Protective Edge, the code name Israel has given for its military operation. The high proportion of civilians among the Palestinian casualties (75 to 80 percent) also suggests that Hamas has become more sophisticated in protecting its militants from Israeli firepower as compared to the results of the two earlier attacks.
Of course, to the extent that Israel is politically weaker, Hamas emerges stronger, withstanding the mighty Israeli military onslaught, demonstrating resilience under the most difficult circumstance, and mounting stubborn resistance that frustrates Israel's announced war goals.
Has Israel become a "fundamentalist" state, betraying all dreams and aspirations that led to its original founding?
I think Israel has definitely moved gradually in the direction of a maximalist understanding of the Zionist project, which is now quite clearly intended to exercise permanent sovereign control over "Judea and Samaria," what the world knows as "the West Bank." The new president of Israel, Reuven Rivlin, due to take over very soon from Shimon Peres, belongs to the right wing of Netanyahu's Likud Party. He is an undisguised advocate of an enlarged Israel that claims the whole of biblical Palestine and repudiates all diplomacy associated with establishing peace on the basis of a Palestinian state, in effect, a one-state approach with Palestinians as permanent minority. Additionally, the Israel of today has moved far to the right; many Israelis have developed a consumerist mentality, and the conflict with Palestine, except during crises as at present, has posed serious threats in recent years to the stability and serenity of the country. Also, due to high fertility rates and the importance of the settler movement, religious Judaism has been playing a larger role, and injects a certain measure of religious extremism and ethnic intolerance into Israeli political and social life.
The two-state solution, long proposed by supporters of the Palestinian cause, including the late Edward Said, seems to be a dead end - at least in my own eyes. Do you agree with this assessment, and, if so, what is the alternative for securing lasting peace among Israelis and Palestinians?
To clarify Edward Said's position: He did favor for a time in the late 1980s, as did the PLO, the two-state solution, but in the last years of his life he strongly endorsed a single, secular bi-national state as the only workable arrangement allowing the two peoples to live together in peace and dignity. Said rejected the idea of an ethnic state for either people, and believed that Zionist claims to have a Jewish state in historic Palestine would never result in a just and sustainable peace that acknowledged Palestinian rights under international law, including the right of return and equality for the Palestinian minority living in Israel.
I share Said's latter assessment, and believe that the scale and resolve of the settlers is such as to make their removal politically impossible. For this reason, I have opposed the sort of direct negotiations that the US Secretary of State, John Kerry, pushed so hard a year ago as creating false expectations and artificial pressures. The political preconditions for two states with equal sovereign rights living side by side definitely do not presently exist, and may never have existed. To negotiate with that awareness of futility is to play Israel's game of endless talks, while the building cranes in the settlements continue their unlawful work at an accelerated pace. Time has never been kind to the Palestinians. Their territorial prospects have been continuously diminished and have now reached the point of a virtual zero. Recall that the UN partition plan in 1947 seemed unfair to the Palestinians when it offered them only 45 percent of Palestine, which then was reduced to 22 percent by the outcome of the 1948 war, and related expulsion of the Palestinians, and still further by "the facts on the ground" (settlements, wall, settler only roads) steadily created since 1967.
The best hope of the Palestine national movement at this time is to proceed via a unity government, also engaging the refugee and exile community of 7 million, by working together with the global solidarity movement that is growing rapidly. In other words Palestinian prospects in the future will depend on the continued mobilization of global civil society to support nonviolent coercive action on a worldwide scale. The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) campaign has been growing at a rapid rate recently, with analogies to the anti-apartheid struggle that toppled a racist regime in South Africa against all odds and expectations becoming more relevant. This shift in Palestinian tactics in the direction of what I have called "waging a legitimacy war" seems reinforced in its plausibility by the growing global outrage in response to Israel tactics, especially in callous disregard of Palestinian civilian innocence.
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.

CJ POLYCHRONIOU

C.J. Polychroniou is a research associate and policy fellow at the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College and a columnist for a Greek daily national newspaper. His main research interests are in European economic integration, globalization, the political economy of the United States and the deconstruction of neoliberalism’s politico-economic project. He has taught for many years at universities in the United States and Europe and is a regular contributor to Truthout as well as a member of Truthout’s Public Intellectual Project. He has published several books and his articles have appeared in a variety of journals and magazines. Many of his publications have been translated into several foreign languages, including Greek, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian.
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the Levy Economics Institute or those of its board members.

    http://truth-out.org/news/item/25067-blood-on-american-hands-richard-falk-on-palestine#.U816-aeqydw.email

    Het Joodse Raadslid Naomi Italiaander en de Zionistische Terreur

    Ik las in  het  Joodse propaganda-orgaan NIW dat " Het kersverse Amsterdamse gemeenteraadslid Naomi Italiaander," zowaar " J...