Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

maandag 24 mei 2010

Israel als Schurkenstaat 153

At a time when Israel feels it will be admitted to the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN), it is now revealed how Israel is not only a nuclear power, but a very dangerous one that threatens world security -- not to mention the ONLY nuclear power that practices occupation, colonization and apartheid.


Not that this will have much impact on deeply complicit European governments (led by France, Germany and Spain) who voted, along with other members, to accept Israel's membership in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) despite massive evidence of Israel's violations of international law and human rights and despite legal proof presented to all OECD states that by accepting Israel's membership they were in fact themselves in violation of their obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention. Still, this presents more fuel for civil society actions against business-as-usual with Israel.

Omar Barghouti


Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons

Exclusive: Secret apartheid-era papers give first official evidence of Israeli nuclear weapons


The secret military agreement signed by Shimon Peres and P W Botha

The secret military agreement signed by Shimon Peres, now president of Israel, and P W Botha of South Africa. Photograph: Guardian


Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state's possession of nuclear weapons.

The "top secret" minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa's defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel's defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them "in three sizes". The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that "the very existence of this agreement" was to remain secret.

The documents, uncovered by an American academic, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, in research for a book on the close relationship between the two countries, provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons despite its policy of "ambiguity" in neither confirming nor denying their existence.

The Israeli authorities tried to stop South Africa's post-apartheid government declassifying the documents at Polakow-Suransky's request and the revelations will be an embarrassment, particularly as this week's nuclear non-proliferation talks in New York focus on the Middle East.

They will also undermine Israel's attempts to suggest that, if it has nuclear weapons, it is a "responsible" power that would not misuse them, whereas countries such as Iran cannot be trusted.

A spokeswoman for Peres today said the report was baseless and there were "never any negotiations" between the two countries. She did not comment on the authenticity of the documents.

South African documents show that the apartheid-era military wanted the missiles as a deterrent and for potential strikes against neighbouring states.

The documents show both sides met on 31 March 1975. Polakow-Suransky writes in his book published in the US this week, The Unspoken Alliance: Israel's secret alliance with apartheid South Africa. At the talks Israeli officials "formally offered to sell South Africa some of the nuclear-capable Jericho missiles in its arsenal".

Among those attending the meeting was the South African military chief of staff, Lieutenant General RF Armstrong. He immediately drew up a memo in which he laid out the benefits of South Africa obtaining the Jericho missiles but only if they were fitted with nuclear weapons.

The memo, marked "top secret" and dated the same day as the meeting with the Israelis, has previously been revealed but its context was not fully understood because it was not known to be directly linked to the Israeli offer on the same day and that it was the basis for a direct request to Israel. In it, Armstrong writes: "In considering the merits of a weapon system such as the one being offered, certain assumptions have been made: a) That the missiles will be armed with nuclear warheads manufactured in RSA (Republic of South Africa) or acquired elsewhere."

But South Africa was years from being able to build atomic weapons. A little more than two months later, on 4 June, Peres and Botha met in Zurich. By then the Jericho project had the codename Chalet.

The top secret minutes of the meeting record that: "Minister Botha expressed interest in a limited number of units of Chalet subject to the correct payload being available." The document then records: "Minister Peres said the correct payload was available in three sizes. Minister Botha expressed his appreciation and said that he would ask for advice." The "three sizes" are believed to refer to the conventional, chemical and nuclear weapons.

The use of a euphemism, the "correct payload", reflects Israeli sensitivity over the nuclear issue and would not have been used had it been referring to conventional weapons. It can also only have meant nuclear warheads as Armstrong's memorandum makes clear South Africa was interested in the Jericho missiles solely as a means of delivering nuclear weapons.

In addition, the only payload the South Africans would have needed to obtain from Israel was nuclear. The South Africans were capable of putting together other warheads.

Botha did not go ahead with the deal in part because of the cost. In addition, any deal would have to have had final approval by Israel's prime minister and it is uncertain it would have been forthcoming.

South Africa eventually built its own nuclear bombs, albeit possibly with Israeli assistance. But the collaboration on military technology only grew over the following years. South Africa also provided much of the yellowcake uranium that Israel required to develop its weapons.

The documents confirm accounts by a former South African naval commander, Dieter Gerhardt – jailed in 1983 for spying for the Soviet Union. After his release with the collapse of apartheid, Gerhardt said there was an agreement between Israel and South Africa called Chalet which involved an offer by the Jewish state to arm eight Jericho missiles with "special warheads". Gerhardt said these were atomic bombs. But until now there has been no documentary evidence of the offer.

Some weeks before Peres made his offer of nuclear warheads to Botha, the two defence ministers signed a covert agreement governing the military alliance known as Secment. It was so secret that it included a denial of its own existence: "It is hereby expressly agreed that the very existence of this agreement... shall be secret and shall not be disclosed by either party".

The agreement also said that neither party could unilaterally renounce it.

The existence of Israel's nuclear weapons programme was revealed by Mordechai Vanunu to the Sunday Times in 1986. He provided photographs taken inside the Dimona nuclear site and gave detailed descriptions of the processes involved in producing part of the nuclear material but provided no written documentation.

Documents seized by Iranian students from the US embassy in Tehran after the 1979 revolution revealed the Shah expressed an interest to Israel in developing nuclear arms. But the South African documents offer confirmation Israel was in a position to arm Jericho missiles with nuclear warheads.

Israel pressured the present South African government not to declassify documents obtained by Polakow-Suransky. "The Israeli defence ministry tried to block my access to the Secment agreement on the grounds it was sensitive material, especially the signature and the date," he said. "The South Africans didn't seem to care; they blacked out a few lines and handed it over to me. The ANC government is not so worried about protecting the dirty laundry of the apartheid regime's old allies."

Israel als Schurkenstaat 152

Geschat wordt dat Israel over meer dan 200 nucleaire wapens beschikt.

Israeli Professor:
'We Could Destroy All European Capitals'

(IAP News) -- An Israeli professor and military historian hinted that Israel could avenge the holocaust by annihilating millions of Germans and other Europeans.

Speaking during an interview which was published in Jerusalem Friday, Professor Martin Van Creveld said Israel had the capability of hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons.

"We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force."

Creveld, a professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, pointed out that "collective deportation" was Israel's only meaningful strategy towards the Palestinian people.

"The Palestinians should all be deported. The people who strive for this (the Israeli government) are waiting only for the right man and the right time. Two years ago, only 7 or 8 per cent of Israelis were of the opinion that this would be the best solution, two months ago it was 33 per cent, and now, according to a Gallup poll, the figure is 44 percent."

Creveld said he was sure that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon wanted to deport the Palestinians.

"I think it's quite possible that he wants to do that. He wants to escalate the conflict. He knows that nothing else we do will succeed."

Asked if he was worried about Israel becoming a rogue state if it carried out a genocidal deportation against Palestinians, Creveld quoted former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan who said "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."

Creveld argued that Israel wouldn't care much about becoming a rogue state.

"Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under."


Paul heeft een nieuwe reactie op uw bericht "Het Joods Nationaal Fonds 2" achtergelaten:

Israël staat toch pal in zijn niet aflatende strijd tegen apartheid, Stan?

Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons

Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state's possession of nuclear weapons.

The "top secret" minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa's defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel's defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them "in three sizes". The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that "the very existence of this agreement" was to remain secret.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-weapons

Apart toch altijd weer, die vredesprijs-dragers die je bij duistere zaken weer tegenkomt.



Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons

Exclusive: Secret apartheid-era papers give first official evidence of Israeli nuclear weapons

The secret military agreement signed by Shimon Peres and P W  Botha

The secret military agreement signed by Shimon Peres, now president of Israel, and P W Botha of South Africa. Photograph: Guardian

Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state's possession of nuclear weapons.

The "top secret" minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa's defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel's defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them "in three sizes". The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that "the very existence of this agreement" was to remain secret.

The documents, uncovered by an American academic, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, in research for a book on the close relationship between the two countries, provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons despite its policy of "ambiguity" in neither confirming nor denying their existence.

The Israeli authorities tried to stop South Africa's post-apartheid government declassifying the documents at Polakow-Suransky's request and the revelations will be an embarrassment, particularly as this week's nuclear non-proliferation talks in New York focus on the Middle East.

They will also undermine Israel's attempts to suggest that, if it has nuclear weapons, it is a "responsible" power that would not misuse them, whereas countries such as Iran cannot be trusted.

A spokeswoman for Peres today said the report was baseless and there were "never any negotiations" between the two countries. She did not comment on the authenticity of the documents.

South African documents show that the apartheid-era military wanted the missiles as a deterrent and for potential strikes against neighbouring states.

The documents show both sides met on 31 March 1975. Polakow-Suransky writes in his book published in the US this week, The Unspoken Alliance: Israel's secret alliance with apartheid South Africa. At the talks Israeli officials "formally offered to sell South Africa some of the nuclear-capable Jericho missiles in its arsenal".

Among those attending the meeting was the South African military chief of staff, Lieutenant General RF Armstrong. He immediately drew up a memo in which he laid out the benefits of South Africa obtaining the Jericho missiles but only if they were fitted with nuclear weapons.

The memo, marked "top secret" and dated the same day as the meeting with the Israelis, has previously been revealed but its context was not fully understood because it was not known to be directly linked to the Israeli offer on the same day and that it was the basis for a direct request to Israel. In it, Armstrong writes: "In considering the merits of a weapon system such as the one being offered, certain assumptions have been made: a) That the missiles will be armed with nuclear warheads manufactured in RSA (Republic of South Africa) or acquired elsewhere."

But South Africa was years from being able to build atomic weapons. A little more than two months later, on 4 June, Peres and Botha met in Zurich. By then the Jericho project had the codename Chalet.

The top secret minutes of the meeting record that: "Minister Botha expressed interest in a limited number of units of Chalet subject to the correct payload being available." The document then records: "Minister Peres said the correct payload was available in three sizes. Minister Botha expressed his appreciation and said that he would ask for advice." The "three sizes" are believed to refer to the conventional, chemical and nuclear weapons.

The use of a euphemism, the "correct payload", reflects Israeli sensitivity over the nuclear issue and would not have been used had it been referring to conventional weapons. It can also only have meant nuclear warheads as Armstrong's memorandum makes clear South Africa was interested in the Jericho missiles solely as a means of delivering nuclear weapons.

In addition, the only payload the South Africans would have needed to obtain from Israel was nuclear. The South Africans were capable of putting together other warheads.

Botha did not go ahead with the deal in part because of the cost. In addition, any deal would have to have had final approval by Israel's prime minister and it is uncertain it would have been forthcoming.

South Africa eventually built its own nuclear bombs, albeit possibly with Israeli assistance. But the collaboration on military technology only grew over the following years. South Africa also provided much of the yellowcake uranium that Israel required to develop its weapons.

The documents confirm accounts by a former South African naval commander, Dieter Gerhardt – jailed in 1983 for spying for the Soviet Union. After his release with the collapse of apartheid, Gerhardt said there was an agreement between Israel and South Africa called Chalet which involved an offer by the Jewish state to arm eight Jericho missiles with "special warheads". Gerhardt said these were atomic bombs. But until now there has been no documentary evidence of the offer.

Some weeks before Peres made his offer of nuclear warheads to Botha, the two defence ministers signed a covert agreement governing the military alliance known as Secment. It was so secret that it included a denial of its own existence: "It is hereby expressly agreed that the very existence of this agreement... shall be secret and shall not be disclosed by either party".

The agreement also said that neither party could unilaterally renounce it.

The existence of Israel's nuclear weapons programme was revealed by Mordechai Vanunu to the Sunday Times in 1986. He provided photographs taken inside the Dimona nuclear site and gave detailed descriptions of the processes involved in producing part of the nuclear material but provided no written documentation.

Documents seized by Iranian students from the US embassy in Tehran after the 1979 revolution revealed the Shah expressed an interest to Israel in developing nuclear arms. But the South African documents offer confirmation Israel was in a position to arm Jericho missiles with nuclear warheads.

Israel pressured the present South African government not to declassify documents obtained by Polakow-Suransky. "The Israeli defence ministry tried to block my access to the Secment agreement on the grounds it was sensitive material, especially the signature and the date," he said. "The South Africans didn't seem to care; they blacked out a few lines and handed it over to me. The ANC government is not so worried about protecting the dirty laundry of the apartheid regime's old allies."

The Empire 564

UK plans rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan

By Agence France-Presse
Sunday, May 23rd, 2010 -- 10:32 pm


afghan UK plans rapid withdrawal  from Afghanistan



British defense secretary: 'We are not a global policeman'

Senior British officials, including new Foreign Secretary William Hague, arrived in Afghanistan Saturday with a warning that Britain wants to withdraw its troops as soon as possible.

Hague, Defense Secretary Liam Fox and International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell are set to meet President Hamid Karzai in their first visit to the country since a new coalition government took power in London this month.

Hague described Afghanistan -- where around 10,000 British troops are helping fight a Taliban-led insurgency well into its ninth year -- as "our most urgent priority" in comments released from London as the party touched down.

In an interview with The Times newspaper before arriving in Kabul, Fox made clear the visit would focus on speeding up the withdrawal of British troops from Afghanistan, and that no new troops would be deployed.

"We need to accept we are at the limit of numbers now and I would like the forces to come back as soon as possible," he was quoted as saying.

"We have to reset expectations and timelines.

"National security is the focus now. We are not a global policeman. We are not in Afghanistan for the sake of the education policy in a broken 13th-century country. We are there so the people of Britain and our global interests are not threatened," Fox said.

With Karzai having promised that Afghan forces will take on responsibility for the country's security by 2014, Fox said he would see if training could be accelerated to that end.

"I want to talk to people on the ground, our trainers, to see whether there is room to accelerate it without diminishing the quality," he said.

His frank comments came as Britain's defense ministry announced the death of a Royal Marine in southern Afghanistan on Friday, bringing to 286 the number of British soldiers killed in the country since 2001.

Since the overthrow of the Taliban regime in late 2001, a total of 1,778 foreign troops have died in the Afghan war, 1,081 of them from the US.

Britain is the second biggest provider of troops and aid to Afghanistan, behind the United States.

Fox also said British troops, stationed in southern Helmand province, would not relocate to neighbouring Kandahar, where the US is leading international forces in what they hope will be a final fight to eradicate the Taliban.

NATO -- which with the US has 130,000 troops in Afghanistan, due to peak at 150,000 by August -- announced Friday that about 8,000 British troops in Helmand are to come under US operational control.

The move is part of a restructuring of NATO forces in the volatile south of the country, the Taliban heartland where fighting is fiercest.

Command of forces in the south is being divided into two, NATO said in a statement. Britain's Major General Nick Carter will oversee Kandahar, with US Major General Richard Mills taking over command of neighbouring Helmand.

US and NATO troops are building up operations against the Taliban in Kandahar, with military planners saying they hope to have pushed the insurgents out of the city, and the province of which it is capital, by the time the fasting month of Ramadan starts in August.

Hague said before his arrival in Kabul that the new counter-insurgency strategy of General Stanley McChrystal, head of NATO forces in Afghanistan, needs "time and support to succeed".

"We are here in Afghanistan to explore this at the earliest opportunity," he said, adding that as a foreign policy priority, Afghanistan "will consume a lot of our time, energy and effort and it is therefore vital that ministers have a strong understanding of the issues".

The importance of Afghanistan to the new British administration was underscored last Saturday when Karzai became the first foreign leader to meet Prime Minister David Cameron.

Britain's new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government has said it wants to cut the defense budget by at least 25 percent but has pledged to support the country's armed forces in Afghanistan.

The trio of visiting ministers are expected to meet British troops -- along with English football star David Beckham, who arrived at Camp Bastion in Helmand late Friday on a "morale-boosting" visit, a military official said.

Beckham was expected to spend the weekend in Helmand, splitting his time between Bastion and the British base in the provincial capital of Lashkar Gah, which also serves as an outpost for British aid projects in the region.


http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0523/we-global-policeman-britain-afghanistan/

The Empire 563


Via Paul

Amerika heeft officieel twee nieuwe ‘Vietnams’ erbij

Door community (initieel ouwe knar), Op maa 24 mei 2010 12:39, 59x bekeken,




Nieuwe getallen vrijgegeven door het Pentagon, laten een onmiskenbare stijging zien van het aantal VS soldaten met ernstige psychische aandoeningen. Voor het eerst in de geschiedenis zijn er meer soldaten onder behandeling voor mentale problemen, dan voor verwondingen.

In 2009 was dat getal 17.538 (psychische problemen) tegen 17.354 (verwondingen). Dit maakt het al jaren spelende probleem dat Washington, sinds de invasie in Irak en Afghanistan heeft, duidelijk. Veel soldaten, waarvan velen nu twee oorlogen hebben meegemaakt, zijn eenmaal thuis, niet meer in staat hun normale leven weer oppakken. Ze lijden aan PTSD, verslaving aan verdovende middelen, depressie, overprikkeling.

Ook maakt het Pentagon en het ‘US Department of Veterans' Affairs’ zich grote zorgen over de kosten die hiermee gemaakt worden. De psychologen en psychiaters kosten handen vol geld.
Robert Gates, minister van defensie zegt:
"it is costing way too much."

Toch snapt men heel goed dat de psychische druk waaronder de soldaten moeten functioneren enorm is.

1 op de 10 soldaten ongeacht of het om de lucht, zee, landmacht gaat, moet behandeld worden voor psychische problemen. 10 procent van de terugkerende soldaten komt terecht in psychiatrische instellingen, een minder fortuinlijk deel pleegt zelfmoord. Volgens Carl Osgood hebben er meer soldaten zelfmoord gepleegd als de jaren ervoor en hij verwacht dat het komend jaar nog erger zal zijn.

Het Amerikaanse leger dat het leeuwendeel voor haar rekening heeft genomen in de militaire acties in Afghanistan en Irak, heeft daar nu 140.000 manschappen gestationeerd, waarvan 10,222 in psychiatrische ziekenhuizen terecht kwamen. Hetgeen 90% bedraagt van alle ziekenhuis opnames.

Het stijgende aantal terugkomende mentaal instabiele soldaten vormt een groot probleem voor het thuisfront. Volgens Carl Osgood voelen een aantal van deze soldaten zich zo in de steek gelaten dat ze zelfmoord plegen. Het aantal zelfmoorden is het hoogst sinds de nadagen van de Vietnam oorlog, midden 70er jaren.

Afgelopen jaar werd 40% van de ziekenhuisdagen van militairen, besteed aan psychische hulp
5% van deze militairen bleef langer dan een maand.

Je kunt rustig stellen dat financiële kosten zijn geëxplodeerd.

http://zaplog.nl/zaplog/article/amerika_heeft_officieel_twee_nieuwe_vietnams_erbij

Het Neoliberale Geloof 522

Recordaantal Amerikanen moet zijn huis verkopen

Door community (initieel P.uncia), Op maa 24 mei 2010 13:48, 59x bekeken, 5 reacties , nieuws


Het aantal mensen in de VS dat verplicht wordt om zijn woning te verkopen, is de eerste drie maanden van dit jaar gestegen tot een absolute recordhoogte. Dat blijkt uit cijfers van de Mortgage Bankers' Association. De crisis op de huizenmarkt in de VS, die aan de basis lag van de wereldwijde kredietcrisis, is blijkbaar nog lang niet voorbij.

Afbetalingsproblemen

Het feit dat heel wat Amerikanen zonder werk zitten, leidt tot afbetalingsproblemen. Het aantal eigenaars dat zijn huis gedwongen moest verkopen, steeg in de eerste drie maanden van 2010 tot 4,63 procent, tegen 4,58 pct in het vierde kwartaal van vorig jaar. Meer dan veertien procent van de eigenaars heeft minstens 30 dagen betalingsachterstand.

De Amerikaanse werkloosheidsgraad is gestegen tot een recordhoogte van 9,9 procent in april.

Israel als Schurkenstaat 151

Via Paul en John:


Diplomaat gebruikte valse paspoorten voor moord

Australië wil een diplomaat van de Israëlische ambassade het land uitzetten. Een onderzoek heeft namelijk aangetoond dat de Australische paspoorten die gebruikt werden door een moordcommando in Dubai, vals waren. De vervalste paspoorten werden in januari door het commando gebruikt om een hooggeplaatst lid van de Palestijnse Hamas te doden.

De Australische minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Stephen Smith benadrukt dat Australië een "goede vriend" blijft van Israël, maar dat geen enkele regering kan tolereren dat haar paspoorten misbruikt worden. "De overheid heeft gevraagd dat een lid van de Israëlische ambassade in Canberra terug naar Israël wordt gestuurd", aldus Smith.

Onderzoekers in Dubai zijn ervan overtuigd dat de Mossad, de Israëlische geheime dienst, achter de aanslag op Mahmoud al-Mabhouh zit. Het lichaam van het Hamas-lid werd op 20 januari in een hotelkamer in Dubai aangetroffen.

Volgens de politie in Dubai maakte het commando gebruik van valse Australische, Britse en Franse paspoorten om het land binnen te komen. (belga/vsv)
24/05/10 06u41
    volledig dossier: Israel Palestina

    Australia expels Israeli diplomat over Dubai killing

    Page last updated at 11:45 GMT, Monday, 24 May 2010 12:45 UK

    Mahmoud al-Mabhouh Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was killed in his hotel room in Dubai on 19 January

    Australia has expelled an Israeli diplomat saying Israel was behind the forging of Australian passports linked to the murder of a Hamas operative in Dubai.

    Australia's foreign minister said these were "not the actions of a friend".

    The UK took similar action in March, after concluding that Israel was responsible for the use of forged UK passports in the plot.

    The Israeli foreign ministry said Australia's decision was disappointing.

    Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said it was "not in line with the importance and the quality of the relationship between our countries".

    'Sorrow not anger'

    At least four forged Australian passports were used in the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai in January. The originals belonged to Australians living in Israel.

    Foreign Minister Stephen Smith: "I have asked that the withdrawal be effective within the week"

    The Australian government said a police investigation had left it in no doubt that the Israeli authorities were behind "the abuse and counterfeiting of the passports".

    As a result Foreign Minister Stephen Smith asked Israel to withdraw a diplomat, whom he did not identify

    "The decision to ask Israel to remove from Australia one of its officers at the Israeli embassy in Canberra is not something which fills the Australian government with any joy," he said.

    "On the contrary, the decision was made much more in sorrow than in anger."

    Passports from France, Ireland, Germany and Britain were used in the operation, and in March, the British government expelled an Israeli diplomat from London.

    The Israeli government has said there is no proof that it was behind the killing, although Dubai officials have said they are 99.9% sure that agents from Mossad were responsible.


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/asia_pacific/10145459.stm

    Derk Sauer 30


    Ik citeer SP-multimiljonair Derk Sauer, eigenaar van de NRC:

    Kranten hadden vroeger macht, geld en arrogantie. Nu hebben ze alleen nog arrogantie.

    Vraag van mij als journalist: waarom zou een marxistische multimiljonair zo graag eigenaar van een krant willen worden die 'arrogant' is?

    Ik citeer SP-multimiljonair Derk Sauer, eigenaar van de NRC:

    Lol is het belangrijkst, maar winst heb je nodig, anders gaan de aandeelhouders zeiken. En dan kan je ook geen lol hebben.

    Waarom is bij het maken van een krant 'lol het belangrijkst'? Waarom is voor Derk Sauer niet het informeren van de lezer het belangrijkst?


    Ik citeer SP-multimiljonair Derk Sauer, eigenaar van de NRC:


    Ik ben lui, ik werk van 12 tot 5. Als de redactie dat ook doet, prima, als we maar verkopen.


    Waarom draait alles bij Sauer om geld? Kopen en verkopen? John Berger in Stemverheffing:


    Consumptie en communicatie zijn tegenwoordig verenigd in een diabolische vennootschap, en uit deze vennootschap bestaat datgene wat wij kennen als de media. Eerst en vooral vertegenwoordigen de media een economisch contract waardoor alles wat er in de wereld gebeurt wordt gekoppeld aan het mechanisme van de verkoop.


    Sauer is volgens eigen zeggen 'lui', maar eist als baas dat zijn ondergeschikten niet lui zijn. Anders vliegen ze eruit, net als bij elke andere baas.


    Wie is Derk Sauer? Wat is Derk Sauer? Namens wie handelt Derk Sauer? Voor wie werkt hij allemaal, dus voor wie is hij een zetbaas? Weet hij het zelf nog?


    Later daarover meer.



    Het Joodse Raadslid Naomi Italiaander en de Zionistische Terreur

    Ik las in  het  Joodse propaganda-orgaan NIW dat " Het kersverse Amsterdamse gemeenteraadslid Naomi Italiaander," zowaar " J...