Zoeken in deze blog šŸ”ŽšŸ”Ž

zaterdag 5 juni 2010

Joods Israelische Doodseskaders


Wat onlangs weer werd aangetoond werd is dat Israelische militairen niet kunnen vechten zodra ze met gemotiveerde tegenstanders geconfronteerd worden. De Turkse bemanning mept de Israelische commando's bijna van boord. Alleen door een overmacht aan wapens konden de Joodse doodseskaders winnen. Zouden daarentegen de bemanningsleden van het gekaapte schip bewapend zijn geweest dan hadden de zionistische terroristen ongetwijfeld verloren.



Israel using ‘pirated’ footage to defend raid: media body

By Agence France-Presse
Thursday, June 3rd, 2010 -- 2:15 pm
13diggsdigg

  Israel using pirated footage to defend raid: media body

JERUSALEM — The Israeli military's YouTube site is using 'pirated' footage confiscated from journalists on board a Turkish vessel in a bid to defend its botched flotilla raid, a press body charged on Thursday.

"The Foreign Press Association (FPA) strongly condemns the use of photos and video material shot by foreign journalists, now being put out by the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) spokesman's office as 'captured material'," a statement from the organization said.

The complaint centers on footage shot on board the Mavi Marmara passenger ship, which was the focus of a deadly Israeli commando raid at dawn Monday, in which nine foreign aid activists were killed, provoking an international outcry.

One of the clips on YouTube, entitled: "Flotilla Passenger: I Want to Be a Shahid (Martyr)" shows a passenger being interviewed on the boat before the raid, by someone holding a microphone with 'Press TV' stamped on it.

The 23-second clip, in which the man talks about wanting to become a martyr, is not credited to any journalist or media outlet, and only described as "footage captured on the Gaza flotilla."

Several other unattributed clips shown on the IDF's YouTube channel also feature "footage captured on the Mavi Marmara" -- one of which shows activists hurling objects and hosing down troops trying to board the vessel from an assault craft.

"The material and/or equipment that was confiscated from journalists covering the events on the ships, should be returned to the owners and their media organizations," the FPA said.

"The use of this material without permission from the relevant media organizations is a clear violation of journalistic ethics and unacceptable," it said, warning media outlets to treat such material "with caution."

"We call upon the authorities to immediately clarify the source of the material."

The army had no immediate comment on the exact source of the footage, with a spokesman saying only it was "found" on board the Marmara after it was taken over by troops following the bloody operation.

Nearly 700 passengers were travelling on board the aid fleet, of which around 60 were journalists, press freedom group Reporters Without Borders said earlier this week, including correspondents from Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya and the Sydney Morning Herald.

Since Monday, the army has broadcast more than a dozen video clips on YouTube in a bid to back up its claim that the activists on the boat were not harmless peaceniks but Islamists bent on violence.

Israel als Schurkenstaat 262


Beste mensen,
Via het mailadres van onze stichting ontving ik onderstaande mail, ik stuur hem ter informatie door.
Vriendelijke groet,
Martin

>
>

> Datum: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:22:16 +0200
> Van: Eugene Chateau
>
> L.S.
> Ik weet me met bijgaand bericht niet goed raad, en stuur het dus maar
> rond aan enkele personen, wier wijsheid ik hoog aansla.
>
> Op 31 Mei 2010, de dag waarop de hele wereld verbijsterd en woedend
> kennis nam van een aanval van Israƫl op schepen met vredesactivisten
> werd volgens een bericht in NRC van 1 Juni in Den Haag geopend het
> International Center for Counter Terrorism.
> Het instituut werkt, volgens NRC , "nu nog" op een subsidie van het
> Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken van 500.000 euro per jaar. Het "nu
> nog" suggereert dat het instituut niet vanaf 1 Juni 2010 operationeel
> wordt, maar dat het reeds een werkzame periode achter de rug heeft.
> Als we de website van het ICT opzoeken vinden we het volgende: Het
> International Center for Counter Terrorism (ICT) is in 1996 opgericht
> in en nog steeds gevestigd in Herzliya (Tel Aviv) in Israƫl en noemt
> zichzelf in haar zeer uitvoerige website: "het voornaamste
> wetenschappelijk instituut voor terrorismebestrijding ter wereld, dat
> de internationale samenwerking bevordert in de wereldwijde strijd
> tegen terrorisme" ("the leading academic institute for
> counter-terrorism in the world, facilitating international cooperation
> in the global struggle against terrorism.")
> Nog verder omschrijft het ICT zich als: "een onafhankelijke denktank
> die expertise levert inzake terrorisme, terrorismebestrijding,
> binnenlandse veiligheid, kwetsbaarheid voor bedreiging en
> risico-bepaling, informatie-analyse en defensie-beleid" ("ICT is an
> independent think tank providing expertise in terrorism,
> counter-terrorism, homeland security, threat vulnerability and risk
> assessment, intelligence analysis and national security and defense
> policy.)
> Ook stelt het ICT dat het "bestaat uitsluitend door particuliere
> giften and inkomsten uit activiteiten, projecten en programma's" ("
> relies exclusively on private donations and revenue from events,
> projects and programs.")
>
> Wat dus op 31 Mei in Den Haag officieel geopend is, is een filiaal van
> een Israelische denktank, die zichzelf ook nog (financieel)
> onafhankelijk noemt, en die via een zeer uitvoerig programma van
> symposia en pseudo-wetenschappelijke bijeenkomsten en publicaties, in
> ettelijke landen, maar vooral in de Verenigde Staten en in West Europa
> de Israƫlische leer van het terrorisme en de bestrijding daarvan,
> inclusief de nodige aanpassingen in wetgeving, luidkeels uitdraagt.
>
> Illustratief voor de "wetenschappelijke objectiviteit" van het
> instituut is o.a. haar rapport "Cast Lead casualties report" waaruit
> moet blijken dat de weergave van Hamas en anderen over de slachtoffers
> tengevolge van het lukraak op burgers in Gaza schieten door
> Israƫlische soldaten, van geen kant deugt.
> Sinds 2003 heeft ICT een dochterinstituut, eveneens opgericht door de
> man die ook ICT zelf begon,Dr. Boaz Ganor. Het is de International
> Counter-Terrorism Academic Community (ICTAC), met leden in
> anti-terrorisme-instituten in een zestal landen.
> Treffend is de omschrijving van terrorisme, die de ICTAC hanteert, nl.
> "The deliberate use of violence aimed against civilians in order to
> achieve political ends." Een betere omschrijving van het Israƫlische
> optreden sedert 1948 is nauwelijks denkbaar, maar uiteraard wordt van
> de lezer verwacht dat die ook begrijpt wat er niet staat, nl. "not by
> states and not by jewish Israƫlis"
>
> De mogelijkheid bestaat natuurlijk dat de Nederlandse coƶrdinator
> terrorismebestrijding, of wellicht onze minister Verhagen zelf, dus op
> 31 Mei, de dag na de slachting aan boord van de "Mavi Marmara", lid is
> geworden van deze ICTAC.
> De teksten van de heer Verhagen over de aanval op het Turkse schip
> lijken in elk geval rechtstreeks afkomstig van het ICT in Tel Aviv.
> Maar ICT of ICTAC, beide zijn gevestigd in Tel Aviv en zijn geen
> nederlandse, maar Israƫlische instituten, en het blijft wonderlijk dat
> het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken die met 500.000 euro's
> subsidieert.
> E.D.Chateau



Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
Instituut tegen terrorisme in Den Haag geopend.docInstituut tegen terrorisme in Den Haag geopend.doc
35 kB Weergeven als HTML Openen als Google-document Downloaden

Israel als Schurkenstaat 261

Neil van der Linden
aan yahooneil

details weergeven 12:15 (7 uren geleden)

electronicintifada.net/v2/article11319.shtml

You will have no protection

-- Medgar Evers to Civil Rights Activists in Mississippi, shortly before he was assassinated, 12 June, 1963

My heart is breaking; but I do not mind.

For one thing, as soon as I wrote those words I was able to weep. Which I had not been able to do since learning of the attack by armed Israeli commandos on defenseless peace activists carrying aid to Gaza who tried to fend them off using chairs and sticks. I am thankful to know what it means to be good; I know that the people of the Freedom Flotilla are/were in some cases, some of the best people on earth. They have not stood silently by and watched the destruction of others, brutally, sustained, without offering themselves, weaponless except for their bodies, to the situation. I am thankful to have a long history of knowing people like this from my earliest years, beginning in my student days of marches and demonstrations: for peace, for non-separation among peoples, for justice for Women, for People of Color, for Cubans, for Animals, for Indians, and for Her, the planet.

I am weeping for the truth of Medgar's statement; so brave and so true. I weep for him gunned down in his carport, not far from where I would eventually live in Mississippi, with a box of t-shirts in his arms that said: "Jim Crow Must Go." Though trained in the United States Military under racist treatment one cringes to imagine, he remained a peaceful soldier in the army of liberation to the end. I weep and will always weep, even through the widest smiles, for the beautiful young wife, Myrlie Evers, he left behind, herself still strong and focused on the truth of struggle; and for their children, who lost their father to a fate they could not possibly, at the time, understand. I don't think any of us could imagine during that particular phase of the struggle for justice, that we risked losing not just our lives, which we were prepared to give, but also our children, who we were not.

Nothing protected Medgar, nor will anything protect any of us; nothing but our love for ourselves and for others whom we recognize unfailingly as also ourselves. Nothing can protect us but our lives. How we have lived them; what battles, with love and compassion our only shield, we have engaged. And yet, the moment of realizing we are truly alone, that in the ultimate crisis of our existence our government is not there for us, is one of shock. Especially if we have had the illusion of a system behind us to which we truly belong. Thankfully I have never had opportunity to have this illusion. And so, every peaceful witnessing, every non-violent confrontation has been a pure offering. I do not regret this at all.

When I was in Cairo last December to support CODEPINK's efforts to carry aid into Gaza I was unfortunately ill with the flu and could not offer very much. I lay in bed in the hotel room and listened to other activists report on what was happening around the city as Egypt refused entry to Gaza to the 1,400 people who had come for the accompanying Freedom march. I heard many distressing things, but only one made me feel, not exactly envy, but something close; it was that the French activists had shown up, en masse, in front of their embassy and that their ambassador had come out to talk to them and to try to make them comfortable as they set up camp outside the building. This small gesture of compassion for his country's activists in a strange land touched me profoundly, as I was touched decades ago when someone in John Kennedy's White House (maybe the cook) sent out cups of hot coffee to our line of freezing student and teacher demonstrators as we tried, with our signs and slogans and songs, to protect a vulnerable neighbor, Cuba.

Where have the Israelis put our friends? I thought about this all night. Those whom they assassinated on the ship and those they injured? Is "my" government capable of insisting on respect for their dead bodies? Can it demand that those who are injured but alive be treated with care? Not only with care, but the tenderness and honor they deserve? If it cannot do this, such a simple, decent thing, of what use is it to the protection and healing of the planet? I heard a spokesman for the United States opine at the United Nations (not an exact quote) that the Freedom Flotilla activists should have gone through other, more proper, channels, not been confrontational with their attempt to bring aid to the distressed. This is almost exactly what college administrators advised half a century ago when students were trying to bring down apartheid in the South and getting bullets, nooses, bombings and burnings for our efforts. I felt embarrassed (to the degree one can permit embarrassment by another) to be even vaguely represented by this man: a useless voice from the far past. One had hoped.

The Israeli spin on the massacre: that the commandos were under attack by the peace activists and that the whole thing was like "a lynching" of the armed attackers, reminds me of a Redd Foxx joke. I loved Redd Foxx, for all his vulgarity. A wife caught her husband in bed with another woman, flagrant, in the act, skin to skin. The husband said, probably through pants of aroused sexual exertion: All right, go ahead and believe your lying eyes! It would be fun, were it not tragic, to compare the various ways the Israeli government and our media will attempt to blame the victims of this unconscionable attack for their own imprisonment, wounds and deaths.

So what to do? Rosa Parks sat down in the front of the bus. Martin Luther King followed her act of courage with many of his own, and using his ringing, compassionate voice he aroused the people of Montgomery, Alabama to commit to a sustained boycott of the bus company; a company that refused to allow people of color to sit in the front of the bus, even if it was empty. It is time for us, en masse, to show up in front of our conscience, and sit down in the front of the only bus we have: our very lives.

What would that look like, be like, today, in this situation between Palestine and Israel? This "impasse" that has dragged on for decades. This "conflict" that would have ended in a week if humanity as a whole had acted in defense of justice everywhere on the globe. Which maybe we are learning! It would look like the granddaughter of Rosa Parks, the grandson of Martin Luther King. It would look like spending our money only where we can spend our lives in peace and happiness; freely sharing whatever we have with our friends.

It would be to support boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel to End the Occupation of Gaza and the West Bank and by this effort begin to soothe the pain and attend the sorrows of a people wrongly treated for generations. This action would also remind Israel that we have seen it lose its way and have called to it, often with love, and we have not been heard. In fact, we have reached out to it only to encounter slander, insult and, too frequently, bodily harm.

Disengage, avoid, and withhold support from whatever abuses, degrades and humiliates humanity.

This we can do. We the people; who ultimately hold all the power. We the people, who must never forget to believe we can win.

We the people.

It has always been about us; as we watch governments come and go. It always will be.

Alice Walker is a poet, novelist, feminist and activist whose award-winning works have sold over ten million copies.

Sandra Schulberg

Sandra is een vriendin van ons, een geweldige, geinspireerde vrouw.

Dear Dutch Colleagues & Supporters of NUREMBERG,

I'm still in shock over what happened last night -- Ugandan officials shut down the public screening of NUREMBERG in downtown Kampala. Such a curious historical echo of NUREMBERG's suppression 60+ years ago in the US, albeit now for different reasons that I hope will become clear in the next few days.

This censorship may be the result of nervous and over-zealous police and may not imply a repudiation of NUREMBERG per se, but it is disturbing that public film showings in Uganda are subject to such CID surveillance.

Below is copy of account I sent to ICC & State Dept colleagues this morning. A reporter for the major newspaper here (New Vision) writes that he spoke with the police and they do not deny it. I'll be curious to read what the official explanation is. Story may appear in New Vision today or tomorrow.

I just spoke with Ambassador Blaak who is going to try to rectify all this, and make it possible for NUREMBERG to be screened for the public at Watoto after all. Sadly, I may have left the country by then, as I depart Monday morning, June 7.

Very best,
Sandra

<<>
The African premiere of the newly-restored 1948 documentary film, NUREMBERG: ITS LESSON FOR TODAY, was halted last night, June 4, 2010, at approximately 7:45 pm, apparently by Ugandan officials from the Criminal Investigations Department (CID), a few moments before the film was to begin in the Watoto Church auditorium in downtown Kampala.

I had just completed my introduction when one of the event organizers from the Cinema for Peace Foundation informed me that Ugandan government officials were in the lobby and had ordered the projectionist to stop the projection and turn over the film. At that point I left the auditorium in hope of meeting with the officials myself.

In the lobby, the Watoto Church media manager Barigayomwe Paul Roy pointed out the man who was head of the unit, and I was told he was with CID. I introduced myself and politely asked if it was really necessary to halt the screening and, if so, why. He said I would receive a letter of explanation, but refused to give me his name or his card. I gave him my card and information on the film.

After he left the hall, I was told by the Cinema for Peace organizers that the CID unit had taken not only both DVD copies of NUREMBERG that I had provided, but also DVDs of the other films in the Cinema for Peace series that were to be screened at Watoto next week. I'm told that CID officials also removed several of the leaflets posted on church bulletin boards, and I saw for myself that they had effaced the announcement of the June 4 NUREMBERG screening that had been posted outside the church.

Apparently CID officials questioned the two Cinema for Peace representatives (Andre Rosenberger & Franziska von der Goltz) at some length the night before, following presentation of another Cinema for Peace film, TAKING ROOT, set in Kenya.

When the the CID officials had left, the Cinema for Peace organizers informed Ambassador Mirjam Blaak (mirjamblaak@gmail.com) of what had happened. I have not managed to reach Ambassador Blaak yet, but I understand that she immediately lodged a protest. Apparently thanks to her intervention, CID officials returned to Watoto later that evening and said that subsequent screenings would be allowed, but they did not return the copies of NUREMBERG.

The Watoto Church screening would have been the first public showing in Africa.

For more details on what transpired, please contact Mirjam Blaak (email above) and/or:

Barigayomwe Paul Roy

+256776531008

roy.bariga@watotochurch.com

A private screening of NUREMBERG is scheduled for ICC delegates and NGO representatives tomorrow afternoon at 1:30 pm in the Commonwealth Banquet Hall at the Munyonyo Conference Center. Ben Ferencz is scheduled to make the introduction. Since this is a private screening for badge-holders only, I trust we will be allowed to proceed with the screening.

Best regards,
Sandra Schulberg

PS: As most of you know, NUREMBERG: ITS LESSON FOR TODAY was written and produced by Pare Lorentz and Stuart Schulberg for the US Department of War, based on a script by Stuart Schulberg that was approved by the IMT's Chief US Prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, who was a Justice of the US Supreme Court at the time. Although widely shown in German cinemas after it was completed in 1948, the US government decided not to release it in US theaters (or in any other country) for various political reasons, all understandable in retrospect. The restored film will be shown for the first time to the American public on Sept 26 at the New York Film Festival and it will open in a regular NYC cinema on Sept 29.

For more background on the film:

www.nurembergfilm.org

http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Shows/The_National/World/ID=1504011533

Best regards,

Sandra Schulberg
(producer of the NUREMBERG restoration)

Schulberg Productions
200 Park Avenue South
Suite 1109
New York, NY 10003
Tel +1 917 667 6077

Israel als Schurkenstaat 260

Flotilla: Juridisch zat Israƫl sowieso fout

Door Johnito, Op vri 4 jun 2010 13:09, 357x bekeken, 4 reacties
Vergeet alle propagandatrucs die internet overspoelenom de Israelische aanval op het hulpkonvooi voor Gaza "legitiem" te laten lijken. Juridisch gezien zit Israƫl namelijk gewoon fout. En niet zo'n beetje ook.

Israƫl opereerde volgens het internationaal zeerecht namelijk op Turks grondgebied, en daarom allƩƩn al illegaal. Volgens de Britse ex-ambassadeur Craig Murray, tevens specialist op internationaal recht en zeerecht, zijn er grofweg twee uitkomsten:

Ofwel handelden de commando's onder bevel van Israƫl, wat betekent dat Israƫl en Turkije in staat van oorlog verkeren. In dit geval houdt dat onder meer in dat de commando's een oorlogsmisdaad hebben begaan.Dat betekent dat ze in theorie voor een internationaal tribunaal kunnen worden vervolgd.

Ofwel de commando's voerden hun actie uit zonder autorisatie van de Israƫlische autoriteiten. Als de commando's "voor zichzelf" handelden, dan wordt het nog pikanter: Israƫl is dan namelijk verplicht de militairen aan Turkije uit te leveren, die ze dan mag vervolgen voor moord.

Daarnaast kun je gerichte schoten in het hoofd moeilijk zelfverdediging noemen.

De activisten daarentegen hadden weinig andere keuzes dan zichzelf te verdedigen, met alles wat ze aan boord konden vinden.




Hoe dan ook: de kwestie is niet óf de aanval illegaal is, maar of, door wie en wanneer er uiteindelijk gerechtigheid zal geschieden..

Ondertussen gaan internationaal de protesten onverminderd door.



Vrijdagmiddag 4 juni om 16:30 uur kan ook jij je stem laten horen op het Haagse Buitenhof.

s'Morgens om 10:00 uur was er in Nieuwspoort een persconferentie van de teruggekeerdeNederlandse activisten. Meer daarover volgt.

vrijdag 4 juni 2010

De Commerciele Massamedia 247



De NRC stelt de lezers vandaag de volgende vraag:


Tien keer zoveel PR-medewerkers als journalisten. Baart dat u zorgen?


Mijn antwoord is: Nee. Wat mij daarentegen wel zorgen baart, zonder dat dit ook maar iets verandert of er ook maar iets toe doet, is dat zoveel journalisten zich als PR-medewerkers van de macht gedragen, zoals ik als journalist maar al te vaak constateer. Het feit dat de NRC een tegenstelling in de vraag inbouwt is al een illustrerend voorbeeld van propaganda. Alsof in de praktijk er een wezenlijk verschil bestaat tussen PR en Commerciele Journalistiek.

Fons Elders


Een goed kennis van me, de filosoof Fons Elders, schreef me deze week onder andere dit:

Beste Stan

Ik hoop hem (Buruma) te zien op 22 juni op een conferentie over de sharia in Leiden. Daar is hij met o.m. Abduh Ahmed An-Na'im keynote speaker. Abduh An-Na'im zit in mijn programma. De vraag: waarom mijn programma geen enkele aandacht krijgt in de pers, terwijl we alle kranten hebben aangeschreven, begint me te intrigeren. Wie het weet, mag het zeggen. Op deze url kun je de uitgezonden gesprekken oproepen: http://www.shinto.nl/ref/In_de_spiegel_van.htm Zaterdag a.s. houd ik, samen met Soheila NAJAND, een Europa-Islam dag. http://www.academielibre.eu/ ga naar rechterkolom: seminar 5 + TV-Video

groet,
Fons

Ik heb hem dit antwoord gegeven:

Beste Fons, ik vrees voor je dat je de verkeerde groep hebt geinterviewd. joodse intellectuelen liggen veel beter, op voorwaarde dat die niet noam chomsky etc. heten.

stan

Bovendien, goed nieuws is geen goed nieuws. Moslims moeten puur slecht zijn om interessant te kunnen zijn voor de commerciele massamedia in het Westen.

Truthout Sunday 20/11/2026

  SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2026 Walking September 11’s Other Crime Scenes Millions had fled along the highway I had taken. Behind them Iraq was...