Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

zondag 7 juni 2015

Griekenland

Greece Explores BRICS Development Bank Membership - Deputy Defense Minister

Athens is mulling over the position of a member of the BRICS New Development Bank.
MOSCOW (Sputnik), Anna Liatsu — Greece is considering membership in the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB), Greek Deputy Defense Minister Costas Isychos told Sputnik on Saturday.
"[Greece] is discussing its position to be a future member of the Development Bank of the BRICS," Isychos said.
Russia invited Greece to become the bank's sixth member on May 11, but discussions of Athens' ascension into the NDB were not due to start until the BRICS summit in July.
"Greece's bilateral agreement with BRICS countries has to do with what Greece and the BRICS countries are talking about on the question of development projects within Greece," Isychos told Sputnik.
These discussions are not linked with Greece's outstanding debt to its European and International Monetary Fund lenders, the official said.
The NDB was created in mid-2014 by an agreement between Russia, Brazil, India, China and South Africa. The member states also agreed to establish a $100-billion liquidity reserve to maintain the bank's financial stability.
The bank is expected to become an alternative to Western-dominated financial institutions and will focus mainly on funding infrastructure projects.
Related:
Greece 'Pleasantly Surprised' by Russia’s Invitation to Join BRICS Bank
Greece Joining Development Bank Off the Agenda Until July BRICS Summit
Greece Eyes Strengthening Ties With BRICS – Syriza Politician
Greece Hopes to Increase Global Influence Through BRICS Ties
Tags:
membership, BRICS New Development Bank (NDB), BRICS, Costas Isychos, Greece

Community standards



Read more: http://sputniknews.com/business/20150606/1023034880.html#ixzz3cNEIkXLh


http://sputniknews.com/business/20150606/1023034880.html


Vera Graziadei

  It’s been a year since I started this blog. It’s been a year of pain and tears, anger and wrath, despair and fear, lost countries and gained cities, lost friendships and new friendships, death and birth, love and compassion. It’s been a year since my rose-hued (though already stained) worldview crashed, a year of facing the bare harsh reality of the way things work in this beautiful cruel world, a year of peeling off my treasured illusions, one by one. My comforting illusions about living in a morally-superior, humanist liberal society, which respects and cares for human lives around the world. My treasured illusions, which I would still cling to if I could, but which do not stick to me anymore. Almost ironic: living in a market economy, where all imaginable products are on offer, yet there is no glue, which would stick these false comforting beliefs on me anymore. False beliefs, which were growing out of me so easily and so willingly before.
I admit I’ve already had one eye-opening moment in my life (didn’t we all?) – when I protested on the streets, alongside hundreds of thousands of other citizens, against the war in Iraq, but this country, to which I swore my allegiance before God, went into the illegal war anyway, a war which cost millions of innocent lives, a war that no one ever repented for. War criminals lecturing and prospering, warmongers still writing and publishing – blossoming careers everywhere you look. I felt physically sick and disorientated then and devoured Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, George Monbiot and whoever else was critical of the current world order and was selling in the politics section of LSE bookshop. I was reading to make sense of events, to see the bigger picture, to orientate myself in the world and to know where to go next. And the conclusion I came to then after all this reading, after all this education? To escape. Escape from this horrible real world into the world of fiction, because I wasn’t strong enough to live with this brutal reality, to continue making sense of it, to continue tolerating it and interacting with it, to continue being aware of the blood on the hands that feed me and comfort me.
Entertainment. In the world of entertainment it is very easy to be…well, entertained. Even if somewhere far away drones are falling on people’s homes, you are in this cosy cocoon, feeling relaxed and cool. Things around you look good (carefully designed and built by set designers), people are beautiful (thank you, make-up and hair artists), words flowing are witty and/or meaningful (writers, you are the best). It’s all pleasant, enjoyable and fun, just as it is enjoyable and fun for the audience, and so it is easy to forget and ignore. My achievement over the last few years is that I’ve managed several times to participate in the distraction of a few million people from the brutal reality of wars and poverty and injustice. Distracting myself by distracting others. Entertaining while being entertained. And being recognised and admired and pampered for it (when you get to do it). During those years of forgetting, I’d probably spend far longer hours at my psychotherapist’s room, if IT Crowd, The Mighty Boosh and *shameless plug alert* Peep Show didn’t exist. On the whole it’s much cheaper and easier to just laugh things off, than to really look at them critically and begin thinking about how to change them. In fact, distracting people from things that must be changed is the key to maintaining a status quo. Just look at the wages that Hollywood stars get paid to get an idea how much the market values distraction. Distraction is the glue that holds this society together. If not for proper distraction, quality entertainment, we would all be on the streets rioting. That’s it! Now I’ve got it. I can’t be distracted anymore. I was able to before, but now I can’t.
You might not be interested in politics, but politics is always interested in you. For a few years I could easily ignore news , not buy papers and scroll down past political posts of friends, because they didn’t directly concern me and because they were regarding events far away – Middle East, Africa, Asia. Places where human rights are not respected, places that are less developed and more corrupt and, therefore, where wars are inevitable and where democracy must be enforced by more developed peoples like ourselves. Right? Something like that. All you need to live comfortably in a world, where atrocities are initiated, supported or ignored by our governments is just a vague narrative in your head, supported by a few NYTimes/Guardian/Times/Independent/ articles and constant flow of BBC/CNN propaganda about corruption of some dictator somewhere, who (unlike our own benevolent leaders) is hungry for power and wealth, is envious of our good fortune, prosperity and liberated morals and who is actively plotting to annihilate or invade us. The moment this narrative is embedded in our heads and is not questioned by us, the rest of the world can burn down in ashes and all we’ll feel is either indifference or a sense that, even if it looks a bit gory and messy, ultimately it’s for the best, that is for our own personal best, just like our papers tell us. Isn’t this the mindset of the majority of people? Wasn’t this my mindset before?
My maternal grandmother used to say: “There was no Truth, there is no Truth and there will be no Truth and so never endeavour to search for it”. She also dreamt of being an actress. One could think that I unconsciously assimilated her beliefs and desires in the first years of my life, while she was still alive and looking after me, and that this ancestral drive was ultimately stronger than my own personal inner drive, which was to search for the Truth, the drive that led me to start a Philosophy Society in Brighton College (sounds grander than it was – it was just a couple of geeky discussions) and then study it at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at LSE.  At some stage this ancestral drive kicked in, a valve switched in my head and I decided that I had enough of searching for the Truth (in the context of my masters it was the truth about sovereignty, rights, justice and morals), because it didn’t exist, just like my grandmother always said, and instead I went into the world, where Truth is more fluid and one month you can dwell into one Truth and next month, with a new project, into another Truth.
I remember often re-reading these lines in Dostoevsky’s “Notes from the Underground”: “all plain men and men of action are active only because they are dull-witted and mentally undeveloped. How is that to be explained? Why, like this: owing to their arrested mental development they mistake the nearest and secondary causes for primary causes and in this way persuade themselves much more easily and quickly than other people that they have found a firm basis for whatever business they have in hand and, as a result, they are no longer worried, and that is really the main thing. For start being active you must first of all be completely composed in mind and never be in doubt. But how can I, for instance, compose myself? Where am I to find the primary causes to lean against? Where am I to get the basis from? I am constantly exercising my powers of thought and, consequently, every primary cause with me at once draws another one after itself, one still more primary, and so ad infinitum.”
I related to these words in so far as I, like an Underground Man, was unable to pursue any activity in the real world, because I could not sufficiently believe in any activity, because as a thinking person, my mind always found reasons for doubting the rightness of any line of action. This intellectual position of inactivity worked very well with being in a profession, where ultimately I was told what to act. I did not have to commit to any line of action in the real world, yet, unlike the Underground Man, who was isolated from society, I was able to be part of society by acting in a pretend world and being ‘actively inactive’ (not all actors are, many combine their careers with other jobs and activism, but I wasn’t one of those people then).
First they came for Iraqis, and I did not speak out— Because I was not an Iraqi.
Then they came for Libyans, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Lybian.
Then they came for the Syrians, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Syrian.
Then they came for …. East Ukrainians and….
Never in my wildest nightmares have I imagined that the land that I was born in will be bombed and shelled with the support of the West. (Britain begins training Ukrainian soldiers, US increasing non-lethal military aid in Ukraine) I’m now deeply ashamed to admit that I’d probably continue being apolitical had this Ukrainian horror not started. One year ago, on 2nd of June 2014, the Ukrainian Air Force struck central Lugansk (an event which was ignored and misrepresented in western media) killing completely innocent passerbys, mostly women, amongst them Inna Kukuruza, who’s death, captured on mobile phone camera and circulated on the internet on the same day, has struck me to the core and prompted me to start writing this blog, which was just my way to order my thoughts about the events that were unfolding. It was me getting back to searching for the Truth.
I discovered for myself that BBC, which I used to have high trust in, is as biased and propagandistic, if not more so, as many other state medias around the world, that the Ukrainian War, is related to US Energy War, that the Ukrainian government’s tactics of justifying, promoting and starting the ‘anti-terrorist operation’ are similar to the way other countries have initiated and promoted genocide in the past, that international humanitarian organisations are biased and sponsored by warmongers (Human Rights Watch connection to Soros). I also tried to make sense of why East Ukrainian victims are ignored and officially complained to the BBC  for misrepresenting events and received a polite reply, which ultimately changed nothing. Finally, I (very roughly) outlined for how the system works, what’s the problem with the people running them and what is the alternative way of being and resisting.
This was all a personal intellectual endeavour, which helped me to order my own thoughts and calm down my pain and grief. At some stage this blog had over 10,000 views per article and thanks to it, I dipped my toes into the world of journalism with my pieces published in BNE, Russia Insider, New Cold War, Signs of the Times, Global Research Centre for Research on Globalization and OpedNews. I’ve never accepted any payment for any of my work, even when it was offered, and I declined work for any media, which is state-funded. I am very grateful to everyone who’s been reading this blog and supported me and who found it an inspiration to write their own blogs and to join in the international debate. I’ll continue searching for the Truth (even though I’ve paused writing for a while to deal with the illness and death of my father) as an independent thinker and will proudly continue doing what one media expert said of me as a criticism – “to wear my heart on my sleeve”.


Ukraine 158

'Impeach Poroshenko!’ Massive anti-govt rally held in central Kiev

Published time: June 06, 2015 20:47 
RT photo
RT photo
2.3K3573
A massive march took place in the streets of Kiev to protest against the policies of the current Ukrainian government, calling for its resignation and economic reforms.
According to TASS news agency, up to 3,000 people took to the streets in Kiev on Saturday to protest against lack of reform and economic instability.
The people carried placards reading “We are hungry,” “Raise pensions” as well as some anti-LGBT slogans as they marched along Khreshchatyk Street to Independence square (Maidan Nezalezhnosty) in central Kiev.
RT photo
RT photo

Others called for the current administration to be removed and President Petro Poroshenko impeached, saying his government was unable to handle the problems facing the country.
Protesters demanded a raise in social welfare payments and an end to the unrest in eastern Ukraine. Reinforced police patrols ensured public order during the march.

RT photo
RT photo

Meanwhile, on Friday a Gay Pride march also took place in central Kiev. However, it ended very quickly after attacks by far right radicals. Members of the Right Sector nationalist group hurled smoke bombs and stones at the demonstrators.
Five policemen were injured, one seriously, and about 30 attackers were arrested, according to local media reports.
Previous to the event, Right Sector spokesman Artem Skoropadsky threatened the LGBT activists saying “there will be thousands of us” to counter the march, the Kyiv Post reported on Friday.

Political analyst Aleksandar Pavic told RT that there has been a rapid decline in living standards and human rights since the Maidan revolution in 2014, which resulted in the violent ouster of the former government by Kiev’s current authorities.
“After the Maidan 2014 nobody in Ukraine is enjoying a better life, except people at the top of organizations and structures that caused the Maidan revolution,” Pavic said.
Since Maidan, Ukraine has established an almost “oligarchical regime,” as the current government has excluded a “large fragment of the population from having a say in political life,” he said.
“If they look at their lives today and a year and a half ago I think they cannot but notice the big decline of living standards and even human rights.”
Even under Yanukovich’s rule Ukraine was “much closer to the European way of life,” Pavic said.
“They had peace, they had some hope of economic advancement, they had offers from both West and East,” he added.
Speculating on potential reactions from Kiev’s Western supporter-states to the recent unrest in the capital, he said there will be a public reaction, but “fundamentally nothing will change because they need these people to keep Ukraine in the Western orbit.”

“They’ve allowed the Right Sector to integrate with Ukraine’s national army. You have US army officers training units with members of Right Sector in them.”
The Maidan protests initially began as peaceful protest against then-President Viktor Yanukovich’s refusal to sign an EU association deal in late 2013. However the demonstrations slid into violence and resulted in a coup that toppled the former Ukrainian president and his government in February 2014.
The new authorities promised to undertake political and social reforms needed to meet the economic and democratic norms of the EU countries, so that Ukraine could eventually join the union.
While Kiev awaits concrete assurances from bloc members, EU leaders have been wary of welcoming its eastern neighbor.
“They have their right to have a dream, but maybe not membership in the predictable future,”European Council President Donald Tusk said at the latest Riga summit of the Eastern Partnership in May.

Ukraine 157

Putin an die EU: Ihr werdet mit der Ukraine nicht glücklich werden 

Russlands Präsident Putin analysiert in einem Interview die EU-Intervention in der Ukraine und prognostiziert, dass die EU keine Freude mit der Ukraine haben werde: Kiew habe alle wirtschaftlichen Brücken nach Moskau abgerissen. Nun müsse die EU Milliarden investieren, um dem Land neue Handelspartner zu verschaffen. Gut möglich, dass sich die EU an der Ukraine verhoben hat. 
Ihren XING-Kontakten zeigen
Russlands Präsident Wladimir Putin beim Interview mit dem Corriere della Sera im Kreml in Moskau. (Foto: The Kremlin, Moscow)
Russlands Präsident Wladimir Putin beim Interview mit dem Corriere della Sera im Kreml in Moskau. (Foto: The Kremlin, Moscow)
Russlands Präsident Wladimir Putin hat dem Corriere della Sera ein sehr aufschlussreiches Interview gewährt. In der auf der offiziellen Kreml-Website auf Englisch veröffentlichten Langfassung erklärt Putin, sehr nüchtern und ohne jede ideologische Aufgeregtheit, warum die EU mit der Assoziierung der Ukraine einen Fehler gemacht hat. Die Ukraine habe, so Putin, vor allem traditionelle wirtschaftliche Beziehungen zu Russland. Diese Beziehungen sind viel stärker als jene zur EU. Weil wirtschaftliche Beziehungen ein Geben und Nehmen sind, hätte es sich empfohlen, in der Endphase der Verhandlungen über ein Assoziierungsabkommen mit der Ukraine auch Russland einzubeziehen.
Denn die wirtschaftlichen Verflechtungen zwischen Russland und der Ukraine seien so stark gewesen, dass eine Zerschlagung dieser Beziehungen für beide Staaten vor allem Nachteile bringen würde: Russland muss nun, da der Ukraine vorgeschrieben werde, aus der russischen Energie-Union aus- und in die europäischen einzusteigen, 13 Milliarden Euro aufwenden, um die Energieverbindung zwischen den durch die Ukraine getrennten russischen Landesteilen sicherzustellen. Außerdem müsse sich Russland nun im Militärbereich um andere Lieferanten umsehen, weil bestimmte Ersatzteile etwa für die Flotte der russischen Kampfhubschrauber, nun nicht mehr aus der Ukraine kommen würden.
Das Ungemach für Russland sei jedoch kein Gewinn für die Ukraine:Putin erklärte sehr einleuchtend, dass die EU sicher nicht jene Waffen-Zulieferungen abkaufen werde, die die Ukraine wegen der neuen Feindschaft mit Russland verliert. Die EU habe andere Waffensysteme und könne die Ukraine nicht kompensieren. Werksschließungen und Arbeitslosigkeit seien die Folge.
Putin erläutert in dem Interview sehr schlüssig, dass Russland nichts gegen die Assoziierung der Ukraine mit der EU habe. Er könne jedoch nicht verstehen, warum man über die weitere Zusammenarbeit nicht mit Russland gesprochen hat. Putin sagte, die EU habe sich gegen Präsident Janukowitsch gewandt, als dieser vor der Unterzeichnung des Freihandels-Abkommens mit der EU kurz gezögert habe und gesagt habe, er müsse darüber noch einmal nachdenken. Statt ihm diese Zeit zu gewähren und das Gespräch mit Russland zu suchen, kamen der Putsch und ein nun schon ein Jahr währender Krieg mit hunderten Toten und dem zerstörten Donbass. Das EU-Abkommen ist noch immer nicht unterschrieben, es soll frühestens 2016 so weit sein.
Putin stellt die sehr berechtigte Frage, ob man für diesen unbefriedigenden Zustand wirklich einen Krieg gebraucht habe oder ob man sich nicht besser mit den Partnern verständigt hätte, wie die Ukraine mit der EU und mit Russland zusammenarbeiten könnte.
Putin verweist auf die Tatsache, dass die Ukraine Mitglied der CIS-Freihandelszone gewesen sei und als solche Verpflichtungen gegenüber Russland zu erfüllen gehabt habe. Russland habe nichts gegen den Freihandel der EU mit der Ukraine, hätte jedoch in der finalen Phase der Verhandlungen einbezogen werden müssen. Denn Russland hat enge wirtschaftliche Beziehungen mit der Ukraine, während die wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen zu EU eher überschaubar seien.
Putin sagte, dass die Exporte der Ukraine in die EU nicht gestiegen seien, obwohl alle Zollgrenzen aufgehoben wurden. Der Grund: Die EU brauche die Produkte der Ukraine nicht, weshalb es kein wirtschaftlicher Vorteil für die Ukraine sei, ihre Geschäftsbeziehungen zu Russland zu kappen. Es werde die Ukraine Milliarden kosten, ihre Wirtschaft neu auszurichten. Und diese Milliarden werden nun von der EU kommen müssen.
Putin trifft die EU hier an ihrer empfindlichsten Stelle. Denn eine Untersuchung der vom Kanzleramt finanzierten Beratergruppe für die Ukraine zeigt, dass der Donbass nach den Zerstörungen durch den Krieg für die EU wertlos geworden ist. Das ganze Ukraine-Abenteuer ist also für Deutschland und die EU zu einem Bumerang geworden: Statt neuer Märkte sehen sich die EU-Politiker einem neuen, gewaltigen Fass ohne Boden gegenüber.
Putin skizziert in dem Interview, dass Russland versucht habe, eine ehrliche Partnerschaft mit der EU aufzubauen. Doch die EU sei nur auf ihren eigenen Vorteil bedacht gewesen. So könne man jedoch keine langfristige Partnerschaft aufbauen.
Aus dem Interview wird unmissverständlich klar, dass die Russen das Vertrauen in die EU-Politiker verloren haben. Sie werden versuchen, es bilateral zu erneuern: Putins Signale an die italienischen Leser sind positiv, er streicht heraus, dass Italien und Russland gute Handelspartner seien und bleiben wollen.
Nicht ohne Witz kontert Putin auch auf die Frage, ob Russland denn wirklich eine Demokratie sei, wenn etwa Oppositionspolitiker im russischen Staatsfernsehen so gut wie nicht zu Wort kämen. Ohne Berlusconi beim Namen zu nennen, sagt Putin, dass ja auch die Italiener so ihre Erfahrungen gemacht hätten mit dem Phänomen, dass die Regierung die Medien zu ihren Zwecken einsetze.
Man kann davon ausgehen, dass Russland in den kommenden Monaten die bilateralen Beziehungen zu einzelnen EU-Staaten intensivieren wird.Damit aber wird die EU von innen ausgehöhlt: Die Regierungen der Mitgliedsstaaten werden sich nicht mehr länger von Deutschland, Brüssel und den USA vorschreiben lassen, welche Geschäfte sie mit Russland machen dürfen. Es geht längst an die Substanz für viele Staaten, die ihre Exporte nach Russland nicht auf anderen Absatzmärkten kompensieren können. Putin weiß, dass der Zorn in vielen EU-Staaten über die Zerstörung des guten Verhältnisses zu Russland wächst. Er lässt keinen Zweifel, dass er lieber direkt mit einzelnen Staaten spricht als mit einer unberechenbaren Truppe in Brüssel.
Das Ukraine-Abenteuer gefährdet die EU, weil sich viele fragen, wozu man eine Gemeinschaft braucht, die dem einzelnen schadet und ihn dann zwingt, für diesen Schaden aufkommen zu müssen. Schon jetzt ist die EU kaum in der Lage, in kritischen Fragen geschlossen zu agieren. Wenn sie nur noch als Last empfunden wird, könnten ihre Tage gezählt sein. Mit der Ukraine könnte die EU überzogen haben. Sie ist als Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft willkommen, von der alle profitieren. Als ideologische Schicksalsgemeinschaft dagegen hat sie keine Chance. Der Zerfall wäre die logische Folge. Er könnte schneller kommen, als die Ideologen denken.

Generaal Eichelsheim Wants War

Generaal Onno Eichelsheim @CDS_Defensie We moeten ons #voorbereiden op een grootschalig conflict, terwijl we niet met zekerheid kunnen zegg...