Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

dinsdag 23 december 2008

De Israelische Terreur 494



'Remove The Blinkers and See the Truth
For two years on Cif, I've detailed the miscarriages of justice I've witnessed. But many are still convinced Israel can do no wrong

By Seth Freedman

December 22, 2008 "The Guardian" -- -

I find people over here who keep harping on about 'human rights' violations by Israel conveniently forget or ignore that if Seth were to live in any, yes, ANY Arab or Iranian country in the neighbourhood, he would have been jailed, abused and then deported, if not accused of being a 'zionist' spy and then condemned to capital punishment.
Two years after penning my first piece for Cif, there is still no getting away from the kind of criticism seen in the comment above. No matter that the thrust of georgeindia's rant had nothing to do with the subject of my article, anyone perusing the thread is encouraged to believe that the fact that the Israeli regime has not beheaded me for my dissent is ample proof that all is well in our little corner of the Middle East. Which, of course, it isn't, despite the best efforts of Israel's squadron of cheerleaders to convince the world otherwise.
Although I am a relative newcomer to Israel's Mediterranean shores, the amount of exposure I have had during my four-year sojourn in the Holy Land to the daily humiliation and oppression being meted out to the Palestinians is more than most armchair critics will see in a lifetime. I should know – I was one of them myself for my first 24 years on the planet, and am all too aware how easy it is to be duped by second- or third-hand reporting from the front lines, whether through the media or via friends and family giving their skewed take from inside Israel's borders.
If you believe the official hype, it's a dolce vita in the Occupied Territories, one for which all right-minded Palestinians should be eternally grateful to their benevolent Israeli masters. If you believe the official hype, Palestinians have never had it so good, thanks to the milk of Israeli kindness which flows in rivulets alongside the honey in the Eretz Halav u'Dvash. And, if you believe the official hype, if only the Palestinians would finally give up their struggle for basic human rights, they too could eat from the tree of life in Israel's very own Garden of Eden.
Those are the lines so eagerly swallowed by the blinkered masses for whom Israel can do no wrong, for whom the mere existence of a Jewish state trumps all other, harsher truths, and which deafen them to the cries of those trampled beneath the wheels of the Zionist bandwagon. "We're here to stay," they cry triumphantly, as though the conflict really is as binary as that: 1 = Jews exert unilateral control over every last inch of Biblical Israel; 0 = Jews are instead driven into the sea by the monster that continually lurks under Israel's bed.
The reason behind the creation of the state in 1948 is the very reason the state (in its current form) is doomed to fail. Giving a severely traumatised people a land on which to go through the throes of rebirth and recovery, with no therapeutic or palliative care alongside, meant the experiment was always going to turn out for the worst. Those given the keys to the new state would always see, and fear, the worst in those around them. They were left to come to terms with their pain and fear in the midst of another battleground.
Thanks to the cyclical nature of the tit-for-tat conflict, for every punitive measure taken by the IDF in the name of Israel's so-called search for peace, reprisal attacks by Palestinians and their agents endanger thousands of Jewish lives in return, prompting ever-stronger countermeasures by the Israelis. And so it goes on. Until the fear-fuelled monkey can be got off Israel's collective back, it doesn't matter how much evidence is put in front of them about the state's crimes, since they will always turn a blind eye in favour of believing that there is no other way ensure their security.
The Palestinians are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Rise up and try to smash the chains that bind them, and what was previously a tonne of bricks will be multiplied by 10 in terms of the Israeli response. Lie back and do nothing and the authorities will walk all over them, since there is no reason for the Israelis to apply the brakes themselves.
For two years I have detailed the abuses and miscarriages of justice I witness on every foray I make into the West Bank, and for two years I've been buried under an avalanche of hate in response. It was, is, and will continue to be water off a duck's back, regardless of the outraged responses on the threads, since I'm convinced that the only way to effect change is for the truth to be brought to light. And if I can play a small part in helping that to occur, then nothing and no one is strong enough to act as a deterrent.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments'

Bernard Madoff


'Bernard Madoff:
Wall Street Swindler Strikes Powerful Blows for Social Justice

By James Petras
“We never thought he would do this to us, he was one of our people”, member of Palm Beach Country Club.
December 22, 2008 "Information Clearinghouse" ---

Wall Street broker Bernard (‘Bernie’) Madoff, former president of NASDAQ, revered and respected investor confessed to pulling off the biggest fraud in history, a $50 billion dollar scam. Bernie was known for his generous philanthropy, especially to Zionist, Jewish and Israeli causes. A one time life-guard on Long Island in the 1960’s, Bernie launched his financial career by raising money from colleagues, friends and relatives among wealthier Jews in the Long Island suburbs, Palm Beach, Florida and in Manhattan, promising a modest, steady and secure return of between 10 to 12%, covering any withdrawals in typical Ponzi fashion by drawing on funds from new investors who literally pleaded for Bernie to fleece them. Madoff personally managed at least $17 billion dollars. For almost four decades he built up a clientele, which came to include some of the biggest banks and investment houses in Scotland, Spain, England and France; as well as major hedge funds in the United States. Madoff drew almost all of the funds from high net-worth private clients who were recruited by brokers working on commission. Bernie’s clients included many multi-millionaires and billionaires from Switzerland, Israel and elsewhere, as well as the US’s largest hedge funds (RMF Division of the Man Group and the Tremont). Many of the swindled super-rich clients forced their money on Madoff, who sternly imposed rigorous conditions on potential clients: He insisted they have recommendations from existing investors, deposit a substantial amount and guarantee their own solvency. Most considered themselves lucky to have their funds taken by the highly respected Wall Street…swindler. Madoff’s standard message was that the fund was closed…but because they came from the same world (board members of Jewish charities, pro-Israel fund raising organizations or the ‘right’ country clubs) or were related to a friend, colleague or existing clients, he would take their money.
Madoff set up advisory councils with distinguished members, contributed heavily to museums, hospitals and upscale cultural organizations. He was a prominent member of exclusive country clubs in Palm Beach and Long Island. His reputation was enhanced by his funds record of never having a losing year – a big selling point in luring millionaire investors. Madoff shared with his super-rich clients (Jews and Gentiles) a common upper class life style, and mix of cultural philanthropy with low key financial profiteering. Madoff ‘played’ his colleagues with a soft-spoken, but authoritative, appearance of ‘expertise’, covered by a veneer of upper class collegiality, deep commitment to Zionism and long-term friendships.
Bernie’s mega-fund shared many signs with recent high level scams: The constant high returns, unmatched by any other broker; a lack of third party oversight; a backroom accounting firm physically incapable of auditing the multi-billion dollar operation; a broker-dealer operation directly under his thumb and the total obfuscation of what he was actually investing in. The obvious similarity of signs with other fraudsters were overlooked by the rich and famous, the sophisticated investors and high paid consultants, the Harvard MBA’s and the entire army of regulators from the Security and Exchange Commissions (SEC) because they were totally embedded in the corrupt culture of ‘take the money and run’ and ‘if you’re making it, don’t ask questions’. The reputation of the superior wisdom of a seemingly successful Jewish Wall Streeter fed into the self-delusions of the wealthy and the stereotypes held by millionaire Gentiles.
The Big Swindle
Madoff’s investment fund only dealt with a limited clientele of multi-millionaire and billionaires who kept their funds in for the long haul; the occasional withdrawal were limited in amount and were easily covered by soliciting new funds from new investors fighting to have access to Madoff’s money management. The long-term big investors looked toward passing their investments to their kin or eventual retirement. The wealthy lawyers, dentists, surgeons, distinguished Ivy league professors and others who might need to draw from their funds for an occasional fancy wedding or celebrity-studded bar-mitzvah, could draw from their funds because Madoff had no problem covering the withdrawal by attracting funds from rich owners of sweat shop garment factories, dangerous meat packing outfits and slumlords. Madoff was no Robin Hood, his philanthropic and charity contributions facilitated access to the rich and wealthy who served on the boards of the recipient institutions and proved that he was ‘one of them’ a kind of super-rich ‘intimate’ of the same elite class. The shock, awe and heart attacks that followed Madoff’s confession that he was ‘running a Ponzi scheme’ drew as much anger for the money lost and the fall from the moneyed class as for the embarrassment of knowing that the world’s biggest exploiters and smartest swindlers on Wall Street, were completely ‘taken’ by one of their own. Not only did they suffer big losses but their self-image of themselves as rich because they are so smart and of ‘superior stock’ was utterly shattered: They saw themselves as suffering the same fate as all the schmucks they had previously swindled, exploited and dispossessed in their climb to the top. There is nothing worse for the ego of a respectable swindler than to be trumped by a bigger swindler. As a result, a number of the biggest losers have so far refused to give their names or the amount they lost, working instead through lawyers fighting off other losers.
The Positive Side of Madoff’s Mega-Swindle (The Inadvertent Hand of Justice)'

Wijsheid 24

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Information Clearing House NewsletterNews You Won't Find On CNNDecember 22, 2008 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"A new fascism promises security from the terror of crime. All that is required is that we take away the criminals' rights -- which, of course, are our own. Out of our desperation and fear we begin to feel a sense of security from the new totalitarian state." -- Gerry Spence Lawyer and author - Source: Give Me Liberty, 1998

="The whole drift of our law is toward the absolute prohibition of all ideas that diverge in the slightest form from the accepted platitudes, and behind that drift of law there is a far more potent force of growing custom, and under that custom there is a natural philosophy which erects conformity into the noblest of virtues and the free functioning of personality into a capital crime against society."-- H. L. Mencken (1880-1956) American Journalist, Editor, Essayist, Linguist, Lexicographer, and Critic Source: quoted in New York Times Magazine, 9 August 1964

="Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country." Theodore Roosevelt

Het Neoliberale Geloof 303

'World Faces "Total" Financial Meltdown: Bank of Spain Chief
By AFP
December 22, 2008 "AFP" -- --

The governor of the Bank of Spain on Sunday issued a bleak assessment of the economic crisis, warning that the world faced a "total" financial meltdown unseen since the Great Depression."The lack of confidence is total," Miguel Angel Fernandez Ordonez said in an interview with Spain's El Pais daily."The inter-bank (lending) market is not functioning and this is generating vicious cycles: consumers are not consuming, businessmen are not taking on workers, investors are not investing and the banks are not lending."There is an almost total paralysis from which no-one is escaping," he said, adding that any recovery -- pencilled in by optimists for the end of 2009 and the start of 2010 -- could be delayed if confidence is not restored.Ordonez recognised that falling oil prices and lower taxes could kick-start a faster-than-anticipated recovery, but warned that a deepening cycle of falling consumer demand, rising unemployment and an ongoing lending squeeze could not be ruled out."This is the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression" of 1929, he added.Ordonez said the European Central Bank, of which he is a governing council member, would cut interest rates in January if inflation expectations went much below two percent."If, among other variables, we observe that inflation expectations go much below two percent, it's logical that we will lower rates."Regarding the dire situation in the United States, Ordonez said he backed the decision by the US Federal Reserve to cut interest rates almost to zero in the face of profound deflation fears.Central banks are seeking to jumpstart movements on crucial interbank money markets that froze after the US market for high-risk, or subprime mortgages collapsed in mid 2007, and locked tighter after the US investment bank Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy in mid September.Interbank markets are a key link in the chain which provides credit to businesses and households.'


De Israelische Terreur 493

Mayor of Umm al-Fahm, Khaled Hamdan (center), speaks with Jewish supporters visiting the town, 13 December. (Oren Ziv/ActiveStills)

Door de zionistische hetze van leidende joodse politici in Israsel neemt de spanning tussen Palestijnse en Joodse Israeli's de laaatste jaren toe.
'Arab town blamed for Jewish Pride march's cancellation
Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, 22 December 2008
Jewish peace groups have accused the Israeli police of fueling racism by canceling a "Jewish Pride" march by a far-right group that was to have taken place through one of the largest Arab towns in Israel.The police postponed the march, due last Monday, claiming they had evidence extremist residents of Umm al-Fahm in northern Israel would open fire on the marchers and police."There was a real danger that lives could be lost," said a police spokesman, adding that the decision to ban the march would be reassessed in two weeks.But local Arab leaders and Jewish peace activists claimed the police concocted the story to justify the cancellation of the march. Thousands of Jews had planned to form a human chain with the residents of Umm al-Fahm at the entrance to the town to block the way of the Jewish National Front.Adam Keller, of the peace group Gush Shalom, said the planned show of solidarity would have been nonviolent. He denounced the police for exploiting the stereotype of violent Arab citizens promoted by the marchers, many of whom are hardline settlers in the West Bank."It is a supreme irony that we had organized for thousands of Arabs and Jews to prove we can live here as citizens in harmony," he said. "Then the police cancel the march but use the false pretext that the marchers are in danger rather than that they seek to inflame violence."Claims by the police that Arab residents would shoot at the marchers were derided by Jewish and Arab organizations.Jafar Farah, of the Mossawa parliamentary lobbying group, pointed out that the northern police force had used a similar excuse -- that Arab demonstrators were armed -- in October 2000, at the start of the second Palestinian intifada, to justify its use of live ammunition against protests in Arab communities.A later state inquiry examining the deaths of 13 Arab demonstrators at the hands of the police found that they were unarmed. The inquiry concluded that the institutional view of the police was that Israel's 1.2 million-strong Arab population should be treated as "an enemy" rather than as citizens."The lessons from that inquiry have still not been learnt," Farah said. "There is still a culture of hatred in the police force as well as a culture of incitement. In their different way, the police want to delegitimize the country's Arab minority just as much as the marchers."The Jewish National Front is widely seen as a reinvention of the Kach movement, a Jewish terror organization demanding the expulsion of Palestinians from both Israel and the West Bank. The movement was outlawed in the 1990s.Kach tried to stage a march to Umm al-Fahm in 1984 but was repulsed when Jews and Arabs turned out on a large scale.The police opposed the new march from the outset, saying it believed that confrontations between the marchers and local residents might provoke riots across the north, especially in the wake of violence between Jews and Arabs in Acre in October.'

De Israelische Terreur 492


Journalist and student Hamzi Shaheen lies in his hospital bed in Gaza City after losing both of his legs in an Israeli air strike. (Eva Bartlett)
Misschien kunnen mijn Nederlandse collega's in Israel deze collega van ons eens bezoeken en zijn verhaal noteren. Als tegenwicht tegen de propaganda die ze nu produceren.
'More missile strikes, more victims

Eva Bartlett, The Electronic Intifada,
22 December 2008

Salah Oukal, 46 years old, had gone outside to collect herbs for dinner, harvesting in the dark as the power was out again. It was just before 9pm and he was watering the trees next to his home in Jabaliya, when the missile struck, killing him instantly. A second missile followed immediately but did not explode. Oukal's family spent the next hour searching without success for the father of seven and the family's sole provider. Only with the headlights of an ambulance was Oukal's dismembered body finally retrieved.The ground-to-ground missile fired from the Israeli side of Gaza's eastern border injured an additional three residents, including Oukal's son Ahmed, seven years old, who suffered rocket shrapnel wounds to his hand and head. Israeli authorities claimed that the missile was a response to rockets being fired from the area. However, Oukal's family and neighbors report all had been quiet."He wasn't one of the resistance fighters," his teenage daughter explained. "And there weren't any rockets being fired before he was hit. It was quiet, and the shelling was sudden," she said.On 7 December, a legal adviser to Israel's ministry of defense, Ahaz Benari, told Defense Minister Ehud Barak that "Artillery fire is permissible only in relatively open areas," adding that "artillery fire at urban areas is problematic, if the assessment is that the chance that the shell will hit the launchers is relatively low, while the risk that many civilians will be hurt is substantial.""His arm landed here in front of our window," said Oukal's neighbor, Abu Ashraf Salha. "He initially ricocheted off the house upon impact of the missile," he explained further, detailing how parts of Oukal's severed body flew in various directions. His house, along with Oukal's and another neighbor, sustained significant damage from the missile's impact just meters away. "It shattered our roof," Salha explained, pointing to the pieces of asbestos tile littering the living room floor. "Everything in here was damaged, the furniture, the TV, the lights."Salha's sister was sitting in the living room when the light fixture fell down, but escaped injury. He added that "Three of my kids were lying [in the bedroom] when the roof caved in. Thank God they were not seriously hurt."Two boysSari al-Sanana, eight years old, and his friend Safi, nine years old, lie gravely wounded in the intensive care unit at Gaza City's al-Shifa hospital. Their life-threatening injuries came amid the days of rocket attacks around northern Gaza. On 20 December at 2:45pm, the two friends were bicycling in a area near Beit Hanoun, not far from the Israeli border. An Israeli missile landed between the youths, throwing them from their bikes and riddling their bodies with shrapnel. Both boys sustained head trauma. According to witnesses in the area, no rockets were fired by Palestinian resistance groups before the boys were hit.'

De Israelische Terreur 491

'…and sweep international law under the carpet
By Stuart Littlewood
23 December 2008

Stuart Littlewood argues that, while world politicians sing in praise of a fruitless peace process in the Middle East, Israel continues to seize and colonize Palestinian land and water resources in order to fulfill the Zionist dream of a Greater Israel.Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrats’ new “shadow” foreign secretary here in Britain, reports on his first trip to Palestine/Israel in TotallyJewish.com, a strange choice of platform for a self-styled “liberal”. His biggest impression, he says, was optimism for the peace process: "I developed a strong sense that both sides trusted each other." But as far as I’m aware he didn’t meet the Palestine side – only the Fatah faction, whose coziness with Israel is the stuff of scandal. Last week, in a display of mutual admiration between US President Bush and Fatah’s President Abbas, Bush reportedly said: "People must recognize that we have made a good deal of progress" and Middle East peace talks are now "irreversible". Abbas, whose days are also numbered, praised the outgoing US president, saying: "There is no doubt that we will continue these efforts and the peace negotiations, but everything will be based on the foundation, and that foundation was laid by you during your time in office." But when Abbas’s team was asked if Bush would press Israel to ease its blockade of Gaza, it seemed the US president would not commit to negotiating an end to the siege. So, we can see how devoted they actually are to the cause of peace. Meanwhile, the Quartet – America, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations – says there’s no turning back from US-led talks between Israel and the Palestinians, despite their spectacular lack of progress.So, everyone in high places is singing from the same hymn-sheet in praise of a fruitless peace process. They know perfectly well, of course, that the Israelis have for decades played for time, stringing the world along and whining that they have “no partner for peace” while continuing to seize and colonize all the land and water resources needed to fulfill the Zionist dream of a Greater Israel from the Jordan to the Mediterranean – or, some say, the Euphrates to the Nile. To that end, the regime has endlessly violated UN resolutions, international law and the norms of human decency. Respected Israeli expert Jeff Halper has warned that Israel intends to make its illegal occupation permanent, hence the frenzied rush to establish irreversible facts on the ground, like the monstrous settlements and their supporting infrastructure, to press ahead with further demolition of Arab homes and more ethnic cleansing, and to fracture the remnants of Palestine so that they cannot possibly be drawn together to form a viable, independent state. Anyone who bothers to read the manifestos of the Likud and Kadima parties understands that it is Israel, which is no partner for peace, never was and probably never will be.
Quarrel is between the international community and Israel
So, world leaders, what’s your game? Why should Palestinians have to talk to their tormentors? The path to peace is clearly marked in countless rulings by the United Nations and by the International Court of Justice. These are waiting to be implemented and enforced. Here are some examples:
Resolution 181: (the Partition Plan of 1947, accepted by the Jews) declares Jerusalem, including Bethlehem and Beit Sahour, a corpus separatum – to be run under an international UN administration. This was reiterated in Resolution 303 a year later. We’re still waiting.
Resolution 194: resolves that refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage. That was 60 years ago.
Resolution 237: Israel to allow return of the “new” 1967 Palestinian refugees.
Resolution 242: emphasizes the inadmissibility of acquiring territory by war and calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from land occupied in 1967.
Resolution 252: declares “invalid” Israel's attempts to unify Jerusalem as the Jewish capital.
Resolution 271: condemns Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem.
Resolution 298: deplores Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem.
Resolution 446: determines that Israeli settlements are a “serious obstruction” to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Resolution 452: calls on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories.
Resolution 465: deplores Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements programme.
Resolution 469: strongly deplores Israel's failure to observe the UN Security Council's order not to deport Palestinians.
Resolution 471: expresses deep concern at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Resolution 476: reiterates that Israel's claims to Jerusalem are null and void.
Resolution 478: censures Israel in the strongest terms for its claim to Jerusalem in its Basic Law.
Resolution 605: strongly deplores Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
Resolution 608: deeply regrets that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians.
Resolution 641: deplores Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 673: deplores Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
Resolution 681: deplores Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 694: deplores Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
Resolution 726: strongly condemns Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 799: ditto
The Fourth Geneva Convention is supposed to protect civilians under military occupation – no violence to life or person, no cruelty or torture; no taking of hostages; no outrages upon personal dignity; no collective punishment, no sentencing or executions unless ordered by a properly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees demanded by civilized peoples.In 2004 the International Court of Justice – that “principal judicial organ of the United Nations” – ruled that the Separation Wall is illegal and must be dismantled, and Israel must compensate Palestinians for damage. Furthermore, said the ICJ, all states are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the Wall and to ensure Israel complies with international humanitarian law. Israel is still building it. The quarrel is clearly between the international community and Israel. So please, world leaders, spare us all this tosh about peace negotiations. There can be no peace while one party has his jackboot on the other’s throat. The major powers must first ensure all relevant UN resolutions are respected and international law enforced, not swept under the carpet. The time for Palestinians to sit down and talk is when Israel’s forces are pulled back, as required, behind the 1967 border.What if Israel won’t comply? Easy: suspend trade and technical cooperation. Mr Davey said when asked about his trip: "My one regret was not being allowed to visit Gaza, something I hope to put right as soon as my diary allows." Not allowed to? By whom? Did the Israeli authorities stop him, just as they stopped a surgeon friend from entering Gaza a month ago with a team of medics, stopped the Pope's nuncio and stopped the UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Professor Richard Falk, who is due to report on the situation to the UN Human Rights Council in March? Mr Davey didn't explain. But expressing his intention to visit Gaza does him credit. He certainly won't get a balanced view until he sees for himself and meets Hamas. I wish him well. We are in desperate need of champions for justice, a rare breed in international politics these days.
Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit http://www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk/.

Genocidi

Genocidi Translation / Caption Text / Source Source: https://www.instagram.com/explore/search/keyword/?q=%23postersxgaza and https://www.ins...