Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

maandag 7 juli 2008

De Volkskrant 67

Der Volkskrant bericht:

'Veel vragen rond vrijlating Betancourt
ACHTERGROND, Van onze correspondent Cees Zoon
gepubliceerd op 07 juli 2008 02:46, bijgewerkt op 7 juli 2008 10:24

BOGOTÁ - ‘Ginds zit een stel verbitterden die proberen deze operatie te slachtofferen, maar het zijn verbitterden die Colombia alleen van ver kennen. Wat weten ze daar in de Europese kou nou van het Colombiaanse vernuft? Ze denken dat het Colombiaanse vernuft de moordenaars van de FARC zijn. Op een dag zullen ze deze jongens van het leger leren kennen die deze operatie op touw hebben gezet.’
De Colombiaanse president Álvaro Uribe ontkent alle geruchten dat hij of een bevriende regering betaald zou hebben voor de vrijlating van Ingrid Betancourt vorige week woensdag. Het was een tot in de puntjes voorbereide en uitgevoerde operatie van het leger van Colombia. Op het plaatsen van vraagtekens bij de officiële lezing volgt de standaardbehandeling door Uribe: kritiek uiten op de president is hetzelfde als steun betuigen aan de FARC.'

Lees verder:
http://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/article1040385.ece/
Veel_vragen_rond_vrijlating_Betancourt

Het gaat mij vooral om deze vraag, die de Volkskrant onmiddellijk had kunnen beantwoorden: 'Wat weten ze daar in de Europese kou nou van het Colombiaanse vernuft?' En inderdaad, wat weet de Volkskrant nu eigenlijk van het 'vernuft' van het Colombiaans leger? Omdat mijn Volkskrant-collega's verzuimen hierover hun lezers te informeren, even wat informatie van vijf jaar geleden van Amnesty:

'AMNESTY INTERNATIONALPRESS RELEASE
AI Index: AMR 23/076/2003 (Public)News Service No: 261 18 November 2003

Colombia: Torture on the rise.New Amnesty International report on human rights violations
In a new report on torture in Colombia, Amnesty International renews its call on the Colombian government to strengthen its efforts to combat this horrendous practice and to end impunity.The report is being launched when the United Nations Committee Against Torture is presenting its concluding observations regarding the situation of torture in Colombia. Amnesty International has documented information indicating that the widespread practice of torture carried out by the Colombian security forces, their paramilitary allies and the armed opposition groups is on the rise in the country.Recent data relating to torture indicates that between July 1996 and June 2001 over 1,200 people were tortured, of these over 88% were subsequently killed. Reports indicate that in around 55% of the cases, torture is committed by army-backed paramilitaries, 11% directly by the security forces and almost 7% by armed opposition groups. In the remaining cases responsibility is not known. During 2002 more than 4,000 civilians were killed for political motives, over 1,000 people "disappeared", over 400,000 were displaced and at least 2,700 people were abducted, some 1,500 of whom were abducted by armed opposition groups and paramilitaries. Amnesty International is concerned that the government’s policies are designed to strengthen impunity in cases of human rights violations, including torture, to cover up human rights violations from the view of national and international public opinion and to silence those sectors which denounce and investigate human rights violations.'


Lees verder:http://asiapacific.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR230762003?open&of=ENG-313

Waarom geeft de Volkskrant geen informatie over de doodseskaders van president Uribe? Deze staatsterrorist stelt zelf de vraag. Is het luiheid van mijn collega's, totale onwetendheid? Valt deze informatie buiten de consensus? Vroeger was Cees Zon een goede journalist. Mag hij zijn informatie niet geven? Of vindt de redactie deze informatie te verwoorlozen details. Wie is mevrouw Betancourt eigenlijk? Wie vertegenwoordigt ze nu precies?

zondag 6 juli 2008

De Israelische Terreur 418


'New War Brewing: US, Israel Take Dangerous Steps
by Eric Margolis

GENEVA - The U.S., Israel and Iran are playing a very dangerous game of chicken that soon could result in a new Mideast war.

U.S. intelligence has concluded that Iran is not working on nuclear weapons. But the Bush administration and Israel, recently joined by France, are issuing increasingly loud threats of military action to frighten Iran into halting its nuclear enrichment program.
Iran insists its nuclear program is entirely for civilian use. Tehran is alternating between conciliatory statements and threats to retaliate against any attack by inflicting economic chaos on the global economy. Europe fears the economic damage a war against Iran would bring far more than Iran’s nuclear program.
Senior Israeli officials are openly threatening to attack Iran’s nuclear installations before President George W. Bush’s term expires. Early, this month Israel staged a large, U.S.-approved exercise using F-15s and F-16s to rehearse an attack over 900 miles - precisely the distance to Iran’s nuclear facilities.
The highly regarded American journalist Seymour Hersh just confirmed that the U.S. Congress authorized a $400-million plan to overthrow Iran’s government and incite ethnic unrest. This column reported a year ago that U.S. and British special forces were operating in Iran, preparing for a massive air campaign. Israel’s destruction of an alleged Syrian reactor last fall was a warning to Iran.
This week a Pentagon official claimed an Israeli attack on Iran was coming before year end.
Other Pentagon and CIA sources say a U.S. attack on Iran is imminent, with or without Israel. The Bush administration is even considering using small tactical nuclear weapons against deeply buried Iranian targets.
Senior American officers Admiral William Fallon and Air Force Chief Michael Mosley recently were fired for opposing war against Iran. According to Israel’s media, President Bush even told Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that he could not trust America’s intelligence community and preferred to rely on Israeli intelligence.
AIR BLITZ
Intensifying activity is evident at U.S. bases in Europe and the Gulf, aimed at preparing a massive air blitz that may include repeated attacks on 3,100 targets in Iran. Other sources say Iranian Revolutionary Guard installations will be barraged by cruise missiles.
In Washington, Congress, under intense pressure from the Israel lobby, is about to adopt a resolution calling for a naval blockade of Iran, an overt act of war.
Pro-Israel groups have been airing TV commercials claiming Iran is attacking American troops in Iraq and threatens the U.S.
The Bush administration’s last desperate act, its Gotterdammerung, could be war with Iran. UN weapons inspectors concur with U.S. intelligence that there is no proof Iran is working on nuclear arms, but the neocon war party in Washington is determined to loosen a final Parthian shaft by striking Iran.
Israel asserts the right to maintain its Mideast nuclear monopoly by destroying all fissile-producing reactors in the region. Iran vows to retaliate against Israel with its inaccurate Shahab missiles, shut the Strait of Hormuz and mine the Gulf, producing worldwide financial panic, severe fuel shortages, and $400-$500 per barrel oil. Iran likely will attack U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait, and strike Saudi and Kuwaiti oil facilities. Canadians in Afghanistan could also become targets.
GRAVE DAMAGE...'

Lees verder: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/06/10160/
De Nederlandse massamedia zijn hier muisstil over. Hoe zou dat komen?

De Israelische Terreur 417

Vraagt u het aan het CIDI, dat instituut wordt gefinancierd om informatie te verstrekken:
'
'A week ago we asked the Israeli ambassador in Britain for the truth about the brutal attack on Mohammed Omer by security officials and, if appropriate, for an apology, compensation for his injuries and an undertaking in future to respect his right to go about his work unmolested. He has not replied.
By all accounts Mohammed's tormentors were taking an unhealthy interest in the whereabouts of his prize-money and put him in hospital when his answers weren't to their liking.
We sent Ambassador Ron Prosor numerous published reports and he will presumably have read John Pilger's article in The Guardian. Pilger, twice winner of the Journalist of the Year award, can be relied on to check his sources for accuracy as far as is humanly possible.
Omer was an honoured guest in Britain and was on his way home to his family in Gaza, having committed no crime, when Israeli security officials detained and tortured him. Reports say he was accompanied by Dutch diplomatic staff, who had helped with his travel arrangements in and out of Occupied Palestine.
According to an account on arabmediawatch.com, the Israelis "proceeded to go through every document and paper he had on him, taking down the names and numbers of the European parliamentary officials he had met on his tour. The Shin Bet officials then started to make fun of the European parliamentarians..."
If this is true the Israelis compound their lawlessness by insulting British MPs, among others, and violating their privacy and confidential dealings.
Dahr Jamail, co-recipient of the Martha Gellhorn award with Mohammed Omer, has filed this report (see http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m45416&hd=&size=1&l=e) ......
He was met by a Dutch official at the Allenby Bridge crossing (from Jordan to the West Bank) who was to ferry him back into Gaza. The official waited outside for Omer as he entered the Israeli building. Inside, Omer was told he was not allowed to call this embassy escort when he asked to do so; a Shin Bet officer searched his luggage and documents, and asked him for his English pounds.
Omer was surrounded by eight armed Shin Bet officers. This is how he described what happened next. "A man called Avi ordered me to take off my clothes. I had already been through an x-ray machine. I stripped down to my underwear and was told to take off everything. When I refused, Avi put his hand on his gun. I began to cry: 'Why are you treating me this way? I am a human being.' He said, 'This is nothing compared with what you will see now.' He took his gun out, pressing it to my head and with his full body weight pinning me on my side, he forcibly removed my underwear. He then made me do a concocted sort of dance.
Another man, who was laughing, said: 'Why are you bringing perfumes?' I
replied: 'They are gifts for the people I love'. He said: 'Oh, do you have love in your culture?’
"I had now been without food and water and the toilet for 12 hours and, having been made to stand, my legs buckled. I vomited and passed out. All I remember is one of them gouging, scraping and clawing with his nails at the tender flesh beneath my eyes. He scooped my head and dug his fingers in near the auditory nerves between my head and eardrum. The pain became sharper as he dug in two fingers at a time. Another man had his combat boot on my neck, pressing it into the hard floor. I lay there for over an hour. The room became a menagerie of pain, sound and terror."
Consider the fact that the Israeli Supreme Court has allowed the use of "moderate physical pressure" in the questioning of prisoners... Now consider the fourth Geneva Convention (1949): "(1) Persons taking no active part in the hostilities…shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria."
As the civilised world knows, violence towards civilians, including cruel treatment, torture and outrages to personal dignity, is prohibited. We have added Jamail's report to the ambassador's reading list.
Israel's immediate response to the Omer incident was a denial. An unnamed Israeli security official was quoted as saying that a body search and an examination of Omer’s belongings were carried out "because of the suspicion that he had been in contact with hostile elements and had been asked by them to smuggle something in". Omer received "fair treatment and no irregular action was taken towards him". As for his injuries, he lost his balance and fell "for some reason unknown to us", they said.
This contradicts the Dutch diplomats who accompanied Omer, the doctors in Jericho and Gaza who examined Omer and found he had suffered bruises and broken ribs, and Reporters Without Borders - see
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=27692 - who have recorded a sharp rise in Israel's brutal treatment of journalists, especially those returning from Europe.
Mohammed's experience is a tiny window into the widescale, systematic abuse of
Palestinian people, which goes largely unreported in the West. Since the
international community has permitted a situation in which all residents of Palestine - and visitors - must enter and leave through Israeli crossings the least it should do is insist on a UN presence at all detentions and interrogations.
In the meantime Israel seems especially twitchy about Palestinians with links to Europe.
--
Redress Information & Analysis
Website - http://www.redress.cc/
Newsblog - http://redressnewsblog.blogspot.com/
Redress Information & Analysis is dedicated to exposing injustice, disinformation and bigotry and to providing thought-provoking interpretations of current affairs.

De Israelische Terreur 416

British peer defies Israel lobby

News Release

5 July 2008

http://tinyurl.com/5k5w6u

In a House of Lords debate on Wednesday 3 July, Baroness Jenny Tonge lashed out at the Israelis for their relentless expansion of settlements on Palestinian land in defiance of Geneva Conventions and criticized the international community for failing to take action.

She warned her parliamentary colleagues that the world will never be free of terrorism unless a just solution to the Israel-Palestine problem is delivered.

The debate was initiated by Lord Turnberg. Seventeen peers put their names down to speak but were limited to only two minutes each.

Making full use of this meagre time-slot, Baroness Tonge pressed home her key
message: "If Israel is not persuaded to obey UN resolutions and especially start to dismantle the settlements in the West Bank, anti-Semitism will again stalk Europe. Israel will never have peace; the world will never be free of terrorism unless this problem is resolved.

"Attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq - Iran next - they are not the answer. They have created more terrorism. The answer is a peaceful and just settlement for Israel and the Palestinians, and Israel holds ALL the cards."

She said she was was horrified by the treatment of Mohammed Omer, the prize-winning journalist, who had briefed parliamentarians in London before returning home to Gaza, only to be beaten unconscious by Israeli security guards at the Allenby Bridge crossing while an official from the Dutch Embassy, which had arranged his travel, waited outside. "I am horrified by the rockets from Gaza terrorizing Israelis," she went on, "and by the helicopter gunships on their deadly missions, by the monstrous security wall, the checkpoints, the permit systems..."

The Baroness roundly condemned the power of the Israel lobby, as active here in Britain as in the USA, and the threat of AIPAC, Friends of Israel and the Board of Deputies of British Jews. "The vindictive actions against people who oppose and criticize the lobby, getting them removed from positions they hold, preventing them speaking... I understand their methods." She spoke of "the constant accusations of anti-Semitism, when no such sentiment exists, to silence Israel’s critics".

She has bitter experience. In 2004 Member of Parliament Jenny Tonge, as she was then, outraged her party leader and Friends of Israel in all corners of Parliament when, addressing a meeting of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, she said of Palestinian suicide bombers: "If I had to live in that situation - and I say that advisedly - I might just consider becoming one myself." She was promptly sacked from her position on the Liberal Democrat Party's front bench by Charles Kennedy and the Israel lobby immediately distorted her remark to
read: “If I were Palestinian, I’d be a suicide bomber.”

In a debate in the House of Commons a few months ago Dr Kim Howells, the minister for the Middle East and a former chairman of Labour Friends of Israel, again misquoted her and said, in an attempt to blacken her character: "That is not what a responsible representative in a democracy should say; such a statement contains elements of the insanity that drives people to do that."


De Israelische Terreur 415

Two Israeli settlers in the West Bank settlement of Efrat. En deze terroristen lopen vrij rond in bezet Palestijns gebied en intimideren, mishandelen en vermoorden Palestijnse burgers zonder dat ze daarvoor juridisch vervolgd worden. De Nederlandse politiek steunt deze terreur. Het enige argument dat dit gewapende tuig heeft is dat ze zich joods voelen en daarom het recht hebben anderen te terroriseren. Misschien kunt u het CIDI eens om een reactie op de terreur van de joodse kolonisten vragen. Ik ben benieuwd.

Hieronder een voorbeeld van de grootschalige Israelische terreur tegen de Palestijnse bevolking en het verzet ertegen van joods-Israeli's en Palestijnen:

'Dear Friends,

Just now Abed from Kief el-Hares phoned me to tell me that the village can expect a visit tonight from settlers accompanied by the military. Actually, the military (or at least some soldiers) are already there near the grave of Yohoshua Bin Nun (the Joshua that 'fit the battle of Jericho,' as the song has it), and are setting up tents along with tables with food and soft drinks. The army informed the mayor of the village today that the residents could expect a night visit from settlers (a few of whom are already there helping to prepare for the larger crowd later). From the amount of food, tents, etc., Abed (who lives right across the street from the graves) believes that there will be a large group of settlers, accompanied by soldiers, of course.

The visits of the settlers to the graves have increased, and now occur almost nightly, but usually with only a few settlers at a time (always in the middle of the night). Tonight there will be many. It is not a holiday. I don't know what the occasion is. But these visits are always a trial for the villagers. When the settlers come, the residents of the village are not allowed out of their houses. Closure is declared for the village from midnight till dawn. The settlers are noisy, often throw rocks at the houses, break car windows, and in general do as they will without giving a thought to those who reside in the village. And besides, who is paying for all the goodies? The military? The government? Is this where the Israeli taxpayer's money goes? Considering that Israel has no money for health, education, social benefits, or shelters for the residents of Sderot, it is interesting to find that it has the money to pay for a night-on-the-town for settlers.

Please protest to the army now by phone, and follow up with protest letters to the addresses below. It is useful for Israel to know that the world is watching its acts.

I would be much interested in replies that you receive.

Thanks,
Dorothy

PS in case the person you speak to asks where Kief el-Hares is, it is in the Salfit governate, and is directly across the road from Ariel.


Phone:
Civil Administration from abroad +972 2 9977733 ; from Israel 02 997 7733
DCO Qalqilya +972 9 775 9218 from Israel 09 775 9218 [DCO= District Coordination Officer]

Fax:
Zippi Livni, Minister of Foreign AffairsFax +972 2 530 3367; 02 530 3367
Meir Sheetrit, Minister of the InteriorFax +972 2 670 1628; 02 670 1628
Ehud Barak, Minister of DefenseFax +972 3 691 6940; 03 691 6940'

De Israelische Terreur 414

De Europese Unie, inclusief Nederland, beloont de Israelische terreur, de Israelische schendingen van het internationaal recht en schendt zijn eigen verplichtingen door Israel te belonen met een verbeterd EU-verdrag. Zodra er aanslagen volgen hebben wij geen enkele moreel recht meer om te klagen. Wij zelf steunen terreur.

'GENERAL SECRETARIAT Brussels, 16 June 2008
OF THECOUNCIL
Mediterranean/Middle East

EIGHTH MEETING OF
THE EU-ISRAEL ASSOCIATION COUNCIL
(Luxembourg, 16 June 2008)

Statement of the European Union

1. The EU warmly welcomes this eighth Meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council which takes place shortly after Israel celebrated sixty years since the establishment of an independent State of Israel.

2. Last year, during the seventh Meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council, Israel proposed to upgrade its relations with the European Union and has presented a series of proposals to achieve this goal. The EU, responding positively to Israel’s request, expresses its deep satisfaction with the fact that this EU-Israel Association Council will mark a new phase in our relations.

3. Our common goal to upgrade relations stems from our awareness of the traditional links, the cultural and human values, and the economic and security interests that we share. Israel is a key partner of the EU in the Mediterranean. It has contributed to the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership since its origins in 1995. As a vibrant market economy, with a well developed public administration and a functioning rule of law, Israel also possesses the necessary institutional structures which permit it to work ever more closely and intensively with the European Union.

4. Since its conception in 2003, the European Neighbourhood Policy has contributed to an increase in both the quantity and the quality of relations between the EU and Israel. The European Neighbourhood Policy provides a flexible framework for further strengthening of relations with all ENP partners, including the Palestinian Authority, on the basis of the principle of differentiation, ensuring equal possibilities for all partners. Further upgrading of relations will take place within this context. The EU considers that the upgrading of relations with Israel serves the purpose of pursuing the common objectives and interests of both parties.

5. The European Union wants to continue to develop its partnership with Israel in the context of the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership and in the framework of the broader objective to promote stability, cooperation, and prosperity in the Middle East. Such a partnership will imply a stronger involvement of the European Union in the peace process and in the monitoring of the situation on the ground. In this context, the European Union considers that the creation of a sovereign, independent, democratic, contiguous and viable Palestinian state, living side by side with a secure and prosperous Israel, will contribute significantly to peace and stability in the Middle East.

6. The European Union is determined to develop a closer partnership with Israel. The process of developing a closer EU-Israeli partnership needs to be, and to be seen, in the context of the broad range of our common interests and objectives which notably include the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the implementation of the two-state solution. The European Union also considers the need for urgent confidence building measures taken by the parties according to the Road Map in order to improve the security of Israelis, ease the daily life of Palestinians and to sustain the final status negotiations currently underway.

7. In response to our common desire to upgrade bilateral relations, the European Union looks forward to gradually strengthen cooperation by different means both at the political and sectorial levels in line with our common interest, and to make use of new possibilities to enhance Israeli cooperation in the relevant community programmes.

a) Reinforced political dialogue between Israeli and EU representatives on a range of levels, including meetings of Israeli and EU foreign ministers in the context of the Association Council; troika meetings at ministerial level in the margins of the United National General Assembly meetings in New York; ad hoc meetings of the Director General of Israel's Foreign Ministry with the Political and Security Committee; ad hoc invitations to relevant Working Group meetings to discuss such issues as MEPP, human rights, combating terrorism, cooperation in multilateral fora, CFSP, ESDP, MDG, arms control; establishment of a full fledged Subcommittee on Human Rights instead of the informal Working Group on Human Rights; informal Policy Planning talks on strategic issues; CFSP alignment according to the conditions and procedures established by the EU.
b) Economic and social cooperation and development, notably in the area of employment and social affairs, gender equality and the fight against discrimination, including cooperation with European agencies and institutes.
c) Trade-related issues, market and regulatory reform, with a view to achieving greater convergence towards the EU acquis, in line with Israel’s wish for significant integration into the European Single Market, in areas such as public procurement technical regulations on industrial products, intellectual and industrial property rights, competition policy, sanitary and phito-sanitary legislation etc.
d) Cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs, notably in the areas of fight against organised crime, terrorism, and money laundering and data protection.
e) Transport, energy, information society, environment and science and technology. This could include further cooperation in aviation, increased convergence of Israel energy policy towards the principles of the EU internal energy market, including approximation of regulatory policy and legislation in the electricity and gas sectors, cooperation in the wider context of e-government, and convergence in aspects of environmental governance.
f) People to people contacts. A deepening of relations could entail specific cooperation activities between the EU and Israel within existing regional co-operation instruments such as Tempus IV and Erasmus Mundus as well as work on a joint declaration on cooperation in higher education. The EU Health programme 2008-2013 is open for Israel’s participation.
g) Trilateral cooperation: facilitation of cooperation with the Palestinians on issues such as energy, transport, and trade, in line with the EU-Israel Association Agreement and the EC-PLO Interim Association Agreement.

8. As stipulated in the current ENP Action plan, the EU and Israel will start negotiations reviewing the content of the Action plan. The process of identification of concrete actions in each area will be carried out jointly in the following months. The existing structure of subcommittees will provide the necessary expertise to formulate the content and scope of an instrument which should replace the current ENP Action Plan due to expire by April 2009. Upcoming subcommittee meetings will therefore be tasked to develop, each one in its sector, the content of the upgrading in each field, to be included in a document that will serve as a guide on our common way forward after April 2009.
9. Since the last Association Council held in March 2007, both parties actively pursued the implementation of the EU-Israel ENP Action Plan. The ENP Progress Report, published by the Commission in April 2008, thoroughly described the progress made with regard to the implementation of the priorities addressed during three years since the adoption of the ENP Action plan in April 2005. It states that the ENP has clearly played a catalyst role in boosting EU-Israel relations and that the Action Plan has provided the platform to develop more profoundly EU-Israel cooperation in many fields, paving the way for Israel’s participation in a number of EU initiatives, with Israel being among the front-runners in making use of the new possibilities for ENP partner countries’ to participate in Community programmes.

10. The work done within the structure of the Association Agreement since the last meeting of the Association Council demonstrates that deepened cooperation is already a reality when it comes to the commitment of both sides to fulfil their respective engagements under the ENP Action Plan. It also illustrates the scope and quality of EU-Israel relations in a wide range of areas. The recent meeting of the EU-Israel Association Committee provided an opportunity to take stock of the significant progress made in the context of our cooperation within the ENP.

11. Some notable achievements over the past year are that: Israel – thanks to the signing of the framework protocol – is now in a position to participate in Community programmes. It is the first ENP country able to participate in the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme. In agriculture, a major step forward towards market integration between the EU and Israel has been made with the recent common understanding on mutual trade concessions in the fields of agricultural products, processed agricultural products and fisheries. In transport, horizontal negotiations on air transport have been finalised, and negotiations on a comprehensive agreement in air transport are about to start, opening up markets and potentially generating significant benefits for European consumers. Israel’s participation in the Intelligent Energy-Europe programme is now also possible in principle. In the area of customs cooperation, mutual administrative assistance is functioning well, and communication and cooperation in the fight against fraud were significantly improved (e.g. full connection to OLAF's Anti Fraud Information System ). As regards (employment) social affairs and equal opportunities, cooperation in the field of gender equality is about to be deepened. In the field of justice and legal matters, important progress has been made on the way towards negotiating an operational agreement between EUROPOL and Israel. Thanks to the Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement with the EU (only non-EU country fully associated with EU’s Framework Programmes since 1996), over 1,300 proposals involving Israeli researchers were already received under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Development, and 267 were accepted with a Community contribution of over € 51 million. In the field of education, more than 80 Israeli students have already benefited from scholarships under the Erasmus Mundus exchange programme.
12. More recently, in addition to the EU-Israel Subcommittee on Political Dialogue and Cooperation, two informal working groups on Human Rights and International Organisations met and engaged in a thorough dialogue at expert level on a number of issues.

13. The meeting of the informal working group on Human Rights on 30 April 2008 provided for a third time the opportunity to discuss a broad range of important issues. In this context, the EU reiterates the need for an appropriate follow-up of issues discussed during the last meeting as well as generally on human rights situations of common concern. Strengthening the human rights dialogue between the EU and Israel is an essential part of the process of developing EU-Israeli relations. In this light, the EU intends to establish a subcommittee on human rights, within the framework of the Association Agreement, instead of the current informal working group.

14. Furthermore, a certain number of events were organized: a bilateral seminar on the fight against racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism. This second seminar of its kind provided a welcome opportunity to address issues of common concerns.
15. As of 1 January 2007, implementation of the European Neighbourhood Action Plan is being supported through a €2m/year allocation under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI), destined to finance institutional cooperation activities.
16. The EU reaffirms its commitment to support the parties in the ongoing negotiations on all outstanding issues, including all final status issues, with a view to concluding a peace agreement before the end of 2008 as agreed in Annapolis last November. These negotiations must urgently press ahead. The EU re-emphasizes the importance of the Arab Peace Initiative as a major element in moving the Middle East Peace Process forward.

17. The EU underlines the urgent need for swift and tangible results on the ground in order to sustain Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Action from both sides to implement their Roadmap obligations in parallel to the negotiations is vital in order to retain the confidence and support of the Israeli and Palestinian populations, the region and the wider international community.

18. The EU is deeply concerned by recent accelerated settlement expansion. The EU reiterates that settlement building anywhere in the occupied Palestinian Territories, including East Jerusalem, is illegal under international law. Settlement activity prejudges the outcome of final status negotiations and threatens the viability of an agreed two-state solution. It reiterates its call on Israel to freeze all settlement activity including natural growth, and to dismantle outposts erected since March 2001.

19. The EU condemns the continued firing of rockets from Gaza on southern Israel including the recent attack in Ashkelon and all other activities which are contrary to international law and endanger civilians. While recognising Israel's legitimate right to self-defence, the EU calls for an immediate end to all acts of violence. The EU urges all parties to ensure the protection of affected civilians in accordance with international law. The EU continues to support Egyptian efforts to bring about a cessation of violence and a solution that will allow for the reopening of all crossings.

20. The EU calls for the progressive removal of Israeli restrictions on movement and access in order to improve the situation on the ground and living conditions in the West Bank and revitalise the Palestinian economy. The EU welcomes as a step in the right direction the decision to remove a limited number of roadblocks but underlines the fact that much more remains to be done.

21. The EU remains deeply concerned about the unsustainable humanitarian situation in Gaza. It reiterates its call on all parties to work urgently for the controlled reopening of the crossings in and out of Gaza for both humanitarian reasons and commercial flows. In this context, it calls on Israel to fulfil its obligations regarding the uninterrupted provision of fuel and electricity supplies, as well as that of all other humanitarian assistance. It condemns the attacks from Gaza against the crossing points and terminals and their negative consequences on the delivery of humanitarian aid and fuel. It reiterates its readiness to resume its border assistance mission at the Rafah crossing point as soon as conditions allow under the provisions of the relevant international agreements related to Access and Movement concluded in November 2005.

22. The EU remains committed to assisting Palestinian state-building efforts across a broad range of areas. It welcomes the Palestinian Authority’s efforts to develop an effective and reformed security sector and encourages ongoing efforts towards the fulfilment of its Roadmap obligations in this field. In this regard, the Council expresses its full support to the international conference in support of Palestinian civil security and the rule of law to be hosted by Germany on 24 June 2008. It has decided to expand the EUPOL COPPS mission to support the criminal justice sector namely in the fields of the judiciary and the penitentiary, in co-operation with international partners. It welcomes the recent package of measures agreed by the Quartet Representative with the Israeli and Palestinian authorities, aimed at enhancing both economic activity and the capacity of Palestinian Authority security forces, by improving their ability to operate freely. It emphasises the importance of early implementation of these measures. The Council also welcomes the success of the recent Palestinian Investment Conference in Bethlehem in taking forward the economic development agenda.

23. The EU underlines the need to deliver on pledges made at the International Donor's Conference for the Palestinian State in Paris in December 2007. The EU is the largest contributor of financial assistance to the PA and provides substantial financial support for the Palestinians through its funding mechanism PEGASE which was launched in 2008. The EU continues to support the work of the Quartet Representative, Tony Blair.

24. The EU recalls that a comprehensive peace in the Middle East should also include a lasting settlement for the conflicts between Israel and Syria and between Israel and Lebanon and in this regard welcomes the announcement that Syria and Israel have agreed to initiate peace negotiations under the auspices of Turkey.

25. The EU reaffirms its determination to reinforce Lebanon’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity, which is in the interest of all Lebanese people and key to peace and stability in the region. The EU and its Member States by their prominent role in the new UNIFIL have demonstrated their commitment to the full implementation of UNSC Resolution 1701. The EU calls on all parties in the region to comply with the resolution, notably the arms embargo. It urges Israel to stop violations of Lebanese airspace and to provide the UN with all relevant data to assist them in their efforts to clear cluster ammunitions in Lebanon. The EU also reiterates its call for the immediate release of the two abducted Israeli soldiers.

26. The EU welcomes the agreement reached in Doha on 21 May 2008 that has opened the path towards a full resumption of the functioning of all democratic institutions of the state of Lebanon. The Council welcomes the election of Michel Sleiman as President of Lebanon and looks forward to the full implementation of the Doha agreement based on the Arab initiative and on the principles enshrined in the Lebanese constitution and the Taif Accord.

27. Regarding the Barcelona Process, the EU appreciates Israel’s long-standing commitment as well as its numerous and important contributions to the process. The partners to the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership have re-affirmed their commitment to the continuing implementation of the Five-Year Work Programme, adopted at the Barcelona Summit, in November 2005. At the meeting in Lisbon on 5-6 November 2007, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the partner states also approved the work programme for the current year, which will see an emphasis on the fields of social dialogue, information society, culture and cultural dialogue, trade with a view to finalising the Euro-Med free trade area, industry, environment with a focus on water, and tourism.

28. The next major step will be the launch of a new phase in this relationship, the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean. This will take place in Paris on 13 July 2008. This will signal a new impetus for the process as well as a deepening of commitment through the implementation of ambitious projects across the region.

29. The European Union unequivocally condemns terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and expresses its solidarity with all victims of terrorism, in Israel and elsewhere.

30. The European Union supports the United Nations as the only truly global forum for the fight against terrorism. By adopting the Global Counterterrorism Strategy by consensus on 8 September 2006, the General Assembly and the Member States of the UN demonstrated their unity and resolve in combating terrorism. The European Union stands ready to implement the Strategy in cooperation with all Member States of the UN. The EU continues to be committed to reaching an agreement on the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism as soon as possible so as to complement and build on existing UN counterterrorism agreements and contribute to a deeper international consensus on the normative framework for the fight against terrorism. The EU attaches great importance to universal adherence to, and full implementation of, following UN Conventions and Protocols: The 12 conventions and protocols mentioned in UNSC Resolution 1373, the Nuclear Terrorism Convention in 2005 as well as the three amendments to the Nuclear Material Convention in 2005. Moreover the implementation of the Protocol to the Maritime Convention and the Protocol to the Fixed Platform Protocol.

31. The EU emphasizes that any measures to prevent and combat terrorism must comply with international law, in particular international human rights law, refugee law and humanitarian law, and reiterates that effective counterterrorism measures and the protection of human rights are not conflicting but complementary and mutually reinforcing goals.

32. The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery both to state and non-state actors represents one of the most serious threats to international peace and security. The international community shares the responsibility to actively prevent proliferation. While the EU will continue to use all political and diplomatic instruments at its disposal and act to stem the proliferation of WMD and their means of delivery, the EU underlines the importance of full compliance with and national implementation of existing disarmament and non-proliferation treaties and agreements and other relevant international obligations.

33. The EU also attaches great importance to the universalisation of international instruments against the proliferation of WMD and their means of delivery through signature, accession or ratification, as appropriate, of all relevant instruments. The EU calls upon all States, including Israel, which have not yet done so to accede to the NPT, the CTBT, the IAEA Additional Protocol, the CWC, the BTWC and the HCOC. The EU appreciates Israel´s participation in recent universalisation activities of the EU concerning BTWC.

34. The EU calls on all countries to establish effective systems of national export controls, controlling export and transit of WMD-related goods. The EU is implementing its decision of mainstreaming co-operation on non-proliferation into its wider relations with third countries. The European Union is committed, as provided for by the European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan, to develop dialogue and co-operation with Israel on the fight against proliferation of WMD.

35. The EU continues to regard the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime and the essential foundation for the pursuit of nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament under article VI. The EU will continue to work for a strengthened NPT, inter alia through promoting its universalisation and stricter compliance by all States Parties with their obligations. The EU will continue to remain engaged and to contribute with concrete proposals to NPT Prepcom meetings to make a substantial progress in the process leading up to the Review Conference in 2010.

36. The EU continues to attach great importance to the agreement reached by Euromed Ministers in November 2004 and confirmed in 2005, on the principle of holding an ad hoc meeting on regional security, non-proliferation of WMD and disarmament within the Barcelona framework. The EU will pursue consultations with a view to seeking final agreement on the terms of reference and date for this meeting. With this in mind, the EU-Institute of Security Studies will organise on 19 - 20 June this year a Seminar on Middle East Security and non-proliferation/disarmament involving government officials and academics, to which Israel is invited.

37. The EU reiterates its commitment to the objective of pursuing a mutually and effectively verifiable Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear, biological and chemical, and their delivery systems, as set out in the Barcelona Declaration of 1995.

38. Taking note of the great interest of countries in the region in resorting to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, the EU underlines that when countries make the choice of nuclear energy, the nuclear energy programme should be developed in accordance with the highest standards of safety, security and non-proliferation. The EU is ready to contribute to substantive discussions in the IAEA on the development of multilateral solutions to the nuclear fuel cycle.

39. The EU reaffirms its deep concern at Iran's nuclear program. In this regard, it deplores that Iran has still not complied with its international obligations as reiterated in relevant UNSC resolutions, to suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities in order to restore confidence in the entirely peaceful nature of its programme. The EU also reaffirms its full and unequivocal support for efforts to find a negotiated long-term solution to the Iranian nuclear issue. In the absence of action by Iran to meet its obligations, the EU supported the adoption of Security Council Resolution 1803 of 3rd March 2008 which represents a necessary and proportionate response to Iran’s disregard for the concerns of the international community and for previous Security Council Resolutions 1696, 1737 and 1747.

40. The EU expresses its concern about the negative impact of Iranian policies on stability and security in the Middle East and underlines that Iran needs to play a responsible role in the region. In this context, the EU is deeply concerned at Iran’s approach to the Middle East Peace Process, including its opposition to a solution based on two states, Israel and Palestine, existing side by side in peace and security. The EU condemns in the strongest terms the threats towards Israel by the Iranian Government. Furthermore, the EU condemns any denial of the Holocaust as a historical fact, either in whole or in part. The EU expresses deep concern about the continuing deterioration of human rights and political freedoms of Iranian citizens.

41. The EU looks forward to a fruitful and constructive meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council as an additional step towards the further intensification of relations in all areas.


De Israelische Terreur 413

Voor zover ik weeet heeft geen enkele Nederlandse journalist van de commerciele massamedia tot nu toe deze zaak serieus onderzocht of vragen hierover gesteld aan de 'pro-zionistische lobbygroep' CIDI. Wie wel erover berichtte was de onafhankelijke journalist John Pilger. Ik heb dit artikel ge-emaild naar het Centrum Informatie Documentatie Israel vergezeld van een simpele vraag:

'One journalist's story: from triumph to torture

Two weeks ago, I presented a young Palestinian, Mohammed Omer, with the 2008 Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism. Awarded in memory of the great American war correspondent, the prize goes to journalists who expose establishment propaganda, or “official drivel”, as Martha called it. Mohammed shares the prize of £5,000 with the fine war reporter Dahr Jamail. At 24, Mohammed is the youngest ever winner. His citation reads: “Every day, he reports from a war zone, where he is also a prisoner. His homeland, Gaza, is surrounded, starved, attacked, forgotten. He is a profoundly humane witness to one of the great injustices of our time. He is the voice of the voiceless.” The eldest of eight children, Mohammed has seen most of his siblings killed or wounded or maimed. An Israeli bulldozer crushed his home while the family were inside, seriously injuring his mother. And yet, says a former Dutch ambassador, Jan Wijenberg, “he is a moderating voice, urging Palestinian youth not to court hatred but seek peace with Israel.”Getting Mohammed to London to receive his prize was a major diplomatic operation. Israel has perfidious control over Gaza’s borders, and only with a Dutch embassy escort was he allowed out. Last Thursday, on his return journey, he was met at the Allenby Bridge crossing from Jordan by a Dutch official, who waited outside the Israeli building, unaware that Mohammed had been seized by Shin Bet, Israel’s infamous security organisation. Mohammed was told to turn off his cell phone and remove the battery. He asked if he could call his Dutch embassy escort and was told forcefully he could not. A man referred to as Avi stood over his luggage, picking through his documents. “Where’s the money?” he demanded. Mohammed produced some US dollars.“Where’s is the English pound you have?”“I realised,” said Mohammed, “he was after the award stipend for the Martha Gellhorn Prize. I told him I didn’t have it with me. ‘You are lying’, he said. I was now surrounded by eight Shin Bet officers, all armed. The man called Avi ordered me to take off my clothes. I had already been through an x-ray machine. I stripped down to my underwear and was told to take off everything. When I refused, Avi put his hand on his gun. I began to cry: ‘Why are you treating me this way? I am human being’. He said, ‘This is nothing compared with what you will see now’. He took his gun out, pressing it to my head and with his full body weight pinning me on my side, he forcibly removed my underwear. He then made me do a concocted sort of dance. Another man, who was laughing, said, ‘Why are you bringing perfumes?’ I replied, ‘They are gifts for the people I love’. He said, ‘Oh, do you have love in your culture?’“As they ridiculed me, they took delight most in mocking letters I had received from readers in England. I had now been without food and water and the toilet for twelve hours, and having been made to stand, my legs buckled. I vomited and passed out. All I remember is one of them gouging, scraping and clawing with his nails at the tender flesh beneath my eyes. He scooped my head and dug his fingers in near the auditory nerves between my head and eardrum. The pain became sharper as he dug in two fingers at a time. Another man had his combat boot on my neck, pressing into the hard floor. I lay there for over an hour. The room became a menagerie of pain, sound and terror.”An ambulance was called and told to take Mohammed to a hospital, but only after he had signed a statement indemnifying the Israelis from his suffering in their custody. The Palestinian medic refused, courageously, and said he would contact the Dutch embassy escort. Alarmed, the Israelis let the ambulance go. The Israeli line, as reported by Reuters, is familiar; it is that Mohammed was “suspected” of smuggling and “lost his balance” during a “fair” interrogation.Israeli human rights groups have documented the routine torture of Palestinians by Shin Bet agents with “beatings, painful binding, back bending, body stretching and prolonged sleep deprivation”. Amnesty has long reported the widespread use of torture by Israel, whose victims emerge as mere shadows of their former selves. Some never return. Israel is high in an international league table for its intimidation and murder of journalists, especially Palestinian journalists who receive barely a fraction of the kind of coverage given to the hostage-taking of the BBC’s Alan Johnston.The Dutch government says it is shocked by Mohammed Omer’s treatment. Former ambassador Jan Wijenberg said, “This is by no means an isolated incident, but part of a long term strategy to demolish Palestinian social, economic and cultural life... I am aware of the possibility that Mohammed Omer might be murdered by Israeli snipers or bomb attack in the near future.”While Mohammed was receiving his prize in London, the new Israeli ambassador to Britain, Ron Proser, was publicly complaining that many Britons no longer appreciated the uniqueness of Israel’s democracy. Perhaps they do now.'

Lees verder: http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=495

Geachte CIDI-medewerkers. Mijn vraag is kort: hoe verklaart u deze ernstige mishandeling van een gelauwerde journalist? Uw antwoord zal ik zoals gebruikelijk op mijn weblog publiceren.
Vriendelijke groet
Stan van Houcke

And Still the EU Refuses To Finance the Jewish Stat3

Earth Hippy  🌎🕊️💚 @hippyygoat WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR YOU…. This is what the Israeli guards said to Dr. Adnan Al-Bursh the moment he arr...