Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

vrijdag 3 januari 2020

US Assassination May Ignite World War

US Assassination Of Top Iranian Military Official May Ignite World War

The US has admitted to assassinating Iran’s most beloved military leader, General Qassem Soleimani, in a drone strike which seems very likely to ignite a full-scale war. Six others are also reported killed, including Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.
According to the Pentagon, Trump personally ordered the assassination. I’ll keep following this hugely important story and will probably be writing a lot about it as it unfolds. I encourage everyone who values peace and humanity to follow it as well.
“Spoke to a very knowledgeable person about what Iran’s response to Soleimani’s assassination might be,” The Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi tweeted regarding this developing story. “This would be the equivalent of Iran assassinating Petreus or Mattis, I argued. No, he responded, this is much bigger than that.”

US military is a bigger polluter than as many as 140 countries

US military is a bigger polluter than as many as 140 countries – shrinking this war machine is a must
June 24, 2019 3.01pm BST

The US military’s carbon bootprint is enormous. Like corporate supply chains, it relies upon an extensive global network of container ships, trucks and cargo planes to supply its operations with everything from bombs to humanitarian aid and hydrocarbon fuels. Our new study calculated the contribution of this vast infrastructure to climate change.
Greenhouse gas emission accounting usually focuses on how much energy and fuel civilians use. But recent work, including our own, shows that the US military is one of the largest polluters in history, consuming more liquid fuels and emitting more climate-changing gases than most medium-sized countries. If the US military were a country, its fuel usage alone would make it the 47th largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, sitting between Peru and Portugal.
In 2017, the US military bought about 269,230 barrels of oil a day and emitted more than 25,000 kilotonnes of carbon dioxide by burning those fuels. The US Air Force purchased US$4.9 billion worth of fuel, and the navy US$2.8 billion, followed by the army at US$947m and the Marines at US$36m.
A US Navy warship refuelling off the coast of California. Jason Orender/Shutterstock
It’s no coincidence that US military emissions tend to be overlooked in climate change studies. It’s very difficult to get consistent data from the Pentagon and across US government departments. In fact, the United States insisted on an exemption for reporting military emissions in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. This loophole was closed by the Paris Accord, but with the Trump administration due to withdraw from the accord in 2020, this gap will will return.
Our study is based on data retrieved from multiple Freedom of Information Act requests to the US Defense Logistics Agency, the massive bureaucratic agency tasked with managing the US military’s supply chains, including its hydrocarbon fuel purchases and distribution.
The US military has long understood that it isn’t immune from the potential consequences of climate change – recognising it as a “threat multiplier” that can exacerbate other risks. Many, though not all, military bases have been preparingfor climate change impacts like sea level rise. Nor has the military ignored its own contribution to the problem. As we have previously shown, the military has invested in developing alternative energy sources like biofuels, but these comprise only a tiny fraction of spending on fuels.
The American military’s climate policy remains contradictory. There have been attempts to “green” aspects of its operations by increasing renewable electricity generation on bases, but it remains the single largest institutional consumer of hydrocarbons in the world. It has also locked itself into hydrocarbon-based weapons systems for years to come, by depending on existing aircraft and warships for open-ended operations.
Environmentalists should argue for going beyond simply ‘greening’ military infrastructure. EPA/Mohammed Messara

Not green, but less, military

Climate change has become a hot-button topic on the campaign trail for the 2020 presidential election. Leading Democratic candidates, such as Senator Elizabeth Warren, and members of Congress like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are calling for major climate initiatives like the Green New Deal. For any of that to be effective, the US military’s carbon bootprint must be addressed in domestic policy and international climate treaties.
Our study shows that action on climate change demands shuttering vast sections of the military machine. There are few activities on Earth as environmentally catastrophic as waging war. Significant reductions to the Pentagon’s budget and shrinking its capacity to wage war would cause a huge drop in demand from the biggest consumer of liquid fuels in the world.
It does no good tinkering around the edges of the war machine’s environmental impact. The money spent procuring and distributing fuel across the US empire could instead be spent as a peace dividend, helping to fund a Green New Deal in whatever form it might take. There are no shortage of policy priorities that could use a funding bump. Any of these options would be better than fuelling one of the largest military forces in history.



Sonja van den Ende Over Amerikaanse Moord

http://freesuriyah.eu/?p=3743  

Image result for qassem soleimani in Syria"Generaal Qassem Soleimani

De generaal
Qasem Soleimani maart 1957 – 3 januari 2020) was een Iraanse generaal-majoor in de Islamitische Revolutionaire Garde Corps (IRGC) en sinds 1998 commandant van zijn Quds Force, een divisie die primair verantwoordelijk is voor extraterritoriale militaire operaties. Generaal Soleimani is vermoord door de VS an haar handlangers EU en Israel.
Soleimani begon zijn militaire carrière in het begin van de oorlog tussen Iran en Irak in de jaren tachtig, waarin hij het bevel voerde over de 41e divisie. Hij was later betrokken bij extraterritoriale operaties en verleende militaire hulp aan anti-Saddam Shia en Koerdische groepen in Irak, en later Hezbollah in Libanon en Hamas in de Palestijnse gebieden. In 2012 hielp Soleimani de Syrische regering, een belangrijke Iraanse bondgenoot, te versterken tijdens het Syrische conflict, met name in haar operaties tegen ISIS en andere door het westen gefinancieerde terroristiche groepen. Soleimani heeft ook bijgedragen aan het bevel over de gecombineerde Iraakse regering en sjiitische milities en tegen (ISIL) hebben gevochten in 2014-2015.
Soleimani werd vermoord in een gerichte Amerikaanse luchtaanval op 3 januari 2020 in Bagdad, Irak. Ook gedood werden leden van Popular Mobilization Forces. Bij de aanslag werd ook de Iraakse commandant Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, een adviseur van Soleimani, vermoord, in de aanval die werd geautoriseerd door de Amerikaanse president Donald Trump.
De Wereldvrede
Wie zitten er erachter? Trump gaf opdracht, indirect ook schuldig net als Obama in Syrië , Irak, Afghanistan. Het is de VS en Israël  die wereld in een permanent oorlog voeren en de EU, te zwak en te laf om tegengas te geven, doet altijd mee met de grote broer Amerika en Israël . Anti-semitisme wordt verheerlijkt tot een godsdienst en soevereine staten zijn de vijanden geworden, niet de moslims, maar onafhankelijke staten die niet “meedoen” met het imperialistische-zionistisch gedachtegoed. Eenieder die daaraan twijfelt, ziet nu dat het bewaarheid wordt.
De VS samen met haar handlangers Israël en de EU stort de wereld in een nieuwe oorlog, die haar weerga niet zal kennen. We dachten allemaal dat Syrië het hoogtepunt was, maar Iran zal de vernietigendste oorlog worden. Israël heeft zoveel kernwapens, waar het westen niets van weet. Het proliferatie verdrag met het International Atomic Energy Agency is nooit ondertekend.
De wereld zal geen vrede kennen zolang Amerika, Israël en de EU samenspannen, de immense wapenwedloop gaande houden en niet inzien dat zij de provocateurs zijn en niet de landen in het Midden-Oosten. Treurig dat ” gewone” mensen zoals U en ik het niet kunnen stoppen en in een ” Westerse” wereld van oorlog en deceptie leven. Waar leugens de normaliteit zijn en mensen geindoctrineerd zijn door de leugens van de politici, media en de schaduw regering, die uit zijn op gewinnen over letterlijk de ” lijken” van anderen.

Image result for qassem soleimani in Syria"Generaal Soleimani op bezoek bij een Syrische familie. R.I.P
Met vriendelijke groet
Sonja van den Ende


Trump risks a major war in an election year– why?

Trump risks a major war in an election year– why?


News 
 on  
Tonight President Trump ordered a strike on the Baghdad airport that killed a top Iranian general, Qassim Suleimani, along with an Iraqi militia leader. Many experts say that this is an act of war, and Iran is sure to retaliate, as are Iraqi militias. The entire region is said to be on edge from Syria to Lebanon to Israel, fearing a “potential massive regional war,” as Sen. Chris Murphy warns.
The central political question about the assassination is, Why would a president who calls himself antiwar take such a huge risk in an election year?
Donald Trump is running for reelection as an antiwar candidate. He lately gave a speech in which he called the Iraq war “the single worst mistake this country has ever made,” slammed the “military industrial complex,” and told a wrenching story about watching the military coffins being wheeled down off the planes at Dover and family members throwing themselves on the caskets. Trump spoke of never ending wars:
These wars, they never end.  And we have to bring our great soldiers back from the never-ending wars.
Tonight Trump damaged his hopes for reelection, Sina Toossi of the National Iranian American Council says.
Trump thinks he got his Bin Laden moment in an election year. In reality, he’s made the worst strategic mistake by an American leader since the Iraq invasion. The consequences will be felt for years to come. Ensuing quagmire will damage US global position & his reelection chances
I want to believe that Toossi is right, but Trump is as shrewd as they come and I don’t think he acted to endanger his political fortunes, but to enhance them.
Look at who is pleased by the attack, Israel. Israel’s top general has lately declared that some wars are good, and Israel may need to strike civilian targets in Lebanon to set back Hezbollah, the Iranian ally. Even “Peace Now” praises U.S. aggression. The first expert quoted in the New York Times coverage of the attack is Israel lobbyist Mark Dubowitz, and he is very happy.
“This is devastating for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, the regime and [Supreme Leader Ayatollah] Khamenei’s regional ambitions… For 23 years, [Suleimani] has been the equivalent of the J.S.O.C. commander [Joint Special Operations Command], the C.I.A. director and Iran’s real foreign minister,” Mr. Dubowitz said… “He is irreplaceable and indispensable” to Iran’s military establishment.
No doubt Sheldon Adelson, Trump’s biggest donor at well over $100 million to Republican causes, is also pleased by the strike. Six years ago we broke the news that Adelson called on Obama to hit Iran with a nuclear strike. Adelson said at Yeshiva University in New York:
What are we going to negotiate about? I would say ‘Listen, you see that desert out there, I want to show you something.’ …You pick up your cell phone and you call somewhere in Nebraska and you say, ‘OK let it go.’ And so there’s an atomic weapon, goes over ballistic missiles, the middle of the desert, that doesn’t hurt a soul. Maybe a couple of rattlesnakes, and scorpions, or whatever. Then you say, ‘See! The next one is in the middle of Tehran. So, we mean business. You want to be wiped out? Go ahead and take a tough position and continue with your nuclear development.
These days Adelson gets to make such arguments right into the president’s ear.
Trump knew just what he was doing tonight, and he saw it as enhancing his reelection hopes– even if it means more American coffins coming off planes.
Eli Clifton agrees; this is a transactional president. And Cory Booker was on MSNBC tonight (and CNN too) talking about how this would affect Israel. He’s running for president too…
Nothing about Israel on the cables and in the New York Times, though.
h/t James North and Scott Roth. 
Philip Weiss
Philip Weiss is senior editor of Mondoweiss.net and founded the site in 2005-06.
Other posts by .

U.S. Wants War With Iran

https://www.facebook.com/watchparty/2640327439524333/?entry_source=NOTIFICATIONS&hash=ASuB3HdkIIoR1512cnmD9uvYkxIw8tFyGRzL_PSRT6xC2w&notif_id=1578055629089194&notif_t=watch_party_started_implicit 

Elja Looijestijn en de Sluipschutter

In de VPRO Gids van 4 tot 10 januari 2020 verneemt de lezer ondermeer het volgende in een portret van de Palestijnse Nederlander Sakir Khader:

‘Toen de tweede intifada begon, was ik negen jaar. Ik zag op het nieuws ineens geweld in de stad waar ik altijd speelde met mijn vriendjes. Mijn beste vriend was mijn achterneefje, we waren twee avonturiers. In 2002 is hij doodgeschoten door een Israëlische sniper.’ De scherpschutter zag de kleine jongen aan voor een gewapende man en schoot twee kogels in zijn hart.


De vraag is nu, hoe weet de schrijfster, Elja Looijestijn, zo zeker dat de Joods Israelische 'scherpschutter' deze 'kleine jongen' aanzag 'voor een gewapende man'? Zoals  bekend kan een 'scherpschutter' door middel van zijn telescoop een object op twee kilometer afstand doden. Bekend is ook dat Joods-Israelische militairen Palestijnse kinderen doodschieten. Ikzelf ben daar getuige van geweest. Mensenrechten-organisaties hebben er gedocumenteerd over bericht.


Nu het opvallende gebrek aan logica van mevrouw Elja Looijestijn van de VPRO-Gids: hoe is het te verklaren dat de 'scherpschutter' de 'kleine' Palestijnse 'jongen' wel tot twee keer toe in diens 'hart' weet te treffen, maar tegelijkertijd niet zou hebben gezien dat het een 'kleine jongen' betrof. Is dit nu pro-Israel propaganda of weet Looijestijn niet dat een 'scherpschutter' niet voor niets een 'scherpschutter' heet? Ik zal haar deze vraag opsturen. Meer hierover zodra ik van haar antwoord heb gekregen.




Nazi Jews in Israel

  Earth Hippy  🌎🕊️💚 @hippyygoat No other nation but Israel has danced and celebrated while committing genocide… 5:58 p.m. · 12 aug. 2026 ...