Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

donderdag 2 oktober 2008

Het Neoliberale Geloof 183

'Lipstick on a Bailout
By Ron Paul
01/10/09 -"ICH"

This time last week, the biggest bailout in the history of the world seemed to be a fait accompli. Last weekend, the Fed Chairman and the Secretary of the Treasury had harsh words of doom and gloom for Congressional leaders, with the rest of the administration parroting along, and by last Monday it seemed both parties were about to fall in line and vote our Republic away by socializing the banking industry through this bailout.

Foolish business behavior was about to be rewarded, and propped up a little longer, the bubble blown a little bigger, and our coming Depression made that much greater, but then something happened on the way to the House floor.

Citizens made their voices heard.

The real story behind the story in Congress this week was the thousands of calls and emails sent to Representatives, clogging up inboxes and even slowing down the House internet system. Slowly, like the Titanic turning around, sentiments on the Hill shifted, and we heard Congressmen capitulating and changing their tune a little, desperately trying to find ways to salvage the bailout without completely enraging their constituencies.

Now we hear about taxpayer protections, about golden parachutes, and about other nuances that hardly cover up the fact that we would be creating more money out of thin air and further devaluing the dollar! The problem is not HOW the government is spending this money; it’s the fact that the government is spending this money. We don’t have it. We are already nearly $10 trillion in debt, not including unfunded liabilities. We already spend about $1 trillion a year we don’t have on our overseas empire. Now nearly $1 trillion more is somehow supposed to magically appear and solve all our problems! No – creating more money might delay the inevitable for some well-connected banks on Wall Street, but in a few weeks we will find ourselves right back in this same position, but much poorer.

The unfortunate thing is that we’ve already spent at least $700 billion on other bailouts that did not solve the problem. And while all this negotiation was taking place, the auto industry was quietly bailed out, with no controversy, no discussion, to the tune of $25 billion.

Inevitably, it appears Congress will call their constituents’ bluff and the bailout will pass, because that is the habit Wall Street and Washington have fallen into. People are right to be concerned about our financial future. I’ve been talking for 30 some years about reasons we need to be concerned and change our ways. We find ourselves now in a position of no good options, and no silver bullets. But the worst thing we can do is to compound our problems by intensifying the mistakes of the past. We do have tough economic times ahead, no doubt, no matter what we do, even if we do nothing. The question, is will we have the courage to take our medicine now and get it over with, or will we prolong the misery for many years to come? I’m less and less optimistic about the answer to that question.

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas'

Het Neoliberale Geloof 182

Not One Dime! By Mike Whitney
01/10/08 - "ICH" - --

The mystery has been solved.For nearly a year, we have been asking ourselves why the investors and foreign banks that bought up hundreds of billions of dollars of worthless mortgage-backed securities (MBS) from US investment banks have not taken legal action against these same banks or initiated a boycott of US financial products to prevent more people from getting ripped off?Now we know the answer. It's because, behind the scenes, Henry Paulson and Co. were working out a deal to dump the whole trillion dollar mess on the US taxpayer. That's what this whole $700 billion boondoggle is all about; wiping out the massive debts that were generated in the biggest incident of fraud in history. Rep Brad Sherman explained it like this last night to Larry Kudlow: "It (The bill) provides hundreds of billions of dollars of bailouts to foreign investors. It provides no real control of Paulson's power. There is a critique board but not really a board that can step in and change what he does. It's a $700 billion program run by a part-time temporary employee and there is no limit on million dollar a month salaries....... It's very clear. The Bank of Shanghai can transfer all of its toxic assets to the Bank of Shanghai of Los Angeles which can then sell them the next day to the Treasury. I had a provision to say if it wasn't owned by an American entity even a subsidiary, but at least an entity in the US, the Treasury can't buy it. It was rejected.The bill is very clear. Assets now held in China and London can be sold to US entities on Monday and then sold to the Treasury on Tuesday. Paulson has made it clear he will recommend a veto of any bill that contained a clear provision that said if Americans did not own the asset on September 20th that it can't be sold to the Treasury. Hundreds of billions of dollars are going to bail out foreign investors. They know it, they demanded it and the bill has been carefully written to make sure it can happen." So, why hasn't the Treasury Secretary explained the real purpose of the bailout to the American people? Could it be that he knows that his $700 billion bailout would end up like the Hindenburg, vanishing in sheets of flames? This is a terrible bill, and it confers absolute authority on one of the central players in the scandal, Henry Paulson, who was the Chairman of Goldman Sachs at the time this MBS garbage was being peddled around the planet to credulous investors. Now Paulson will be in a position to buy up any "troubled asset" he that he believes could pose a threat to "financial market stability". That's just great! It is clear that Paulson will use his unchecked powers to wipe the slate clean and remove any possibility that foreign investors will take legal action against the real perpetrators; the giant Wall Street investment banks.So, how do the American people like paying off Paulson and Co. future legal bills? Is that how taxpayer revenue should be spent instead of on education, health care and infrastructure? There's another reason why Paulson is working so hard to pass the Bailout for Tycoons Bill; it's a windfall for the banking giants. Citi did not simply pick up Wachovia by happenstance nor did JP Morgan purchase Washington Mutual because it wanted to perform its civic duty and prevent a full-system meltdown. No way; they were clearly aware of the way the wind was blowing. In fact, neither case manages to pass the smell test.This is from AP's Sara Lepro: "Citigroup agreed Monday to purchase Wachovia's banking operations for $2.1 billion in a deal arranged by federal regulators, making the Charlotte-based bank the latest casualty of the widening global financial crisis.'

Philippe Remarque van de Volkskrant 2

Of misschien is hij 1 van deze 2.


















Tot mijn grote schrik laat een anoniem gebleven lezer van mijn blog weten dat dit echt niet Philippe Remarque is.









Ik geloof het onmiddellijk. Ik weet niet hoe hij eruit ziet. Hoe dan ook, hij bestaat echt. Wil de man op de onderste foto zich bij mij melden. Het spijt mij zeer.

Jim Sinclair 4


Jim Sinclair, mr. Gold volgens de New York Times. Van deze goudhandelaar die mij in 2002 adviseerde goud te kopen omdat het toen 200 dollar per troy ounce was en volgens hem in 2008 tenminste 900 dollar zou zijn (wat klopte) kreeg ik zojuist deze email:

'Dear Extend Family,
Unless the LIBOR rate drops sharply we are facing a planetary financial crisis next week.
For God's sake protect yourself.
Gold and gold related items will be the only true storehouses of wealth. The bailout bill is powerless to reverse what is now happening.
This is a modern day Weimar happening right before our eyes.
Respectfully yours,

Jim

Philippe Remarque van de Volkskrant


Deze vlot gekuifde in korte broek gestoken jongeman is Philippe Remarque, correspondent van de Volkskrant.
Wat hebben Nederlandse correspondenten in de VS toch tegen de parlementaire democratie? Op de voorpagina van de Volkskrant schrijft Philippe Remarque vanuit Washington vandaag een 'analyse' onder de paniekerige kop: 'President Bush is alle gezag kwijt. Amerikaanse noodplan. Het machtsvacuum in de VS bemoeilijkt een uitweg uit de financiele crisis.'
Machtsvacuum? Sinds wanneer is er sprake van een machtsvacuum wanneer volksvertegenwoordigers 'meer oog voor de woede van de kiezer' hebben? Democratie betekent nu juist dat de wil van de bevolking gerespecteerd wordt. Nietwaar? De volksvertegenwoordigers zitten er niet om hun eigen zakken of die van de bankiers te spekken, maar om de wil van het volk in politieke besluiten om te zetten. Sinds wanneer betekent dit een 'machtsvacuum'?
Alleen mensen die in een totalitaire macht van 1 president geloven, denken dat er sprake is van een 'machtsvacuum', zodra een plannetje van de baas niet onmiddellijk geaccepteerd wordt. Daarentegen zeg ik als onafhankelijk journalist dat dit nu juist het teken is van een volwassen democratie! Meer dan 530 Congresleden vertegenwoordigen 300 miljoen Amerikanen, en al hun belangen spelen op de achtergrond mee. Het is een proces van checks and balances, dat doorgaans ontaardt in gesjoemel in achterkamertjes en het steunen van de belangen van de rijken. In Nederland heet dat het poldermodel, maar dat heeft natuurlijk niets met een ware democratie van doen. In verband met de op handen zijnde verkiezingen moeten democratisch gekozen politici nu enkele weken naar de wil van het volk luisteren om herkozen te kunnen worden. Even democratie dus. En dat is nu in de ogen van de journalisten als Remarque en Tom-Jan Meeus een 'machtsvacuum' waarbij 'gekken aan de macht' zijn en dat is 1 van de 'tekenen van ontbinding.'


Wie zijn hier nu gekken?

De Commerciele Massamedia 142


De in 1865 geboren Britse auteur Rudyard Kipling omschreef het zo: 'Muilezel, paard, olifant of os gehoorzaamt zijn berijder, en zijn berijder zijn sergeant, en de sergeant zijn luitenant, en de luitenant zijn kapitein, en de kapitein zijn majoor, en de majoor zijn kolonel, en de kolonel zijn brigadecommandant die drie regimenten onder bevel heeft, en de brigadecommandant zijn generaal, die de onderkoning gehoorzaamt, en die is de dienaar van de keizerin.'
Dat was de natuurlijke orde der dingen. En zo is die nog steeds, behalve dat de muilezel nu een computer is geworden en de keizerin een bankier, omdat die -zoals een journalist gisteravond op de Nederlandse televisie verklaarde - onmisbaar is voor het in standhouden van de natuurlijke orde, hij voorziet de mensheid namelijk van onmisbare 'brandstof, het geld.' En ergens in deze hierarchie past de journalist, die net als de geestelijke vroeger, elke dag weer de gelovigen verteld hoe de natuurlijke orde van de wereld eruit ziet.

Het Joodse Raadslid Naomi Italiaander en de Zionistische Terreur

Ik las in  het  Joodse propaganda-orgaan NIW dat " Het kersverse Amsterdamse gemeenteraadslid Naomi Italiaander," zowaar " J...