De Israelische Terreur 61

'A black flag

By Gideon Levy

Haaretz
2 July 2006

A black flag hangs over the "rolling" operation in Gaza.
The more the operation "rolls," the darker the flag
becomes. The "summer rains" we are showering on Gaza are
not only pointless, but are first and foremost blatantly illegitimate. It is not legitimate to cut off 750,000 people from electricity. It is not legitimate to call on 20,000 people to run from their homes and turn their towns into ghost towns. It is not legitimate to penetrate Syria's airspace. It is not legitimate to kidnap half a government and a quarter of a parliament.

A state that takes such steps is no longer distinguishable
from a terror organization. The harsher the steps, the
more monstrous and stupid they become, the more the moral underpinnings for them are removed and the stronger the impression that the Israeli government has lost its nerve. Now one must hope that the weekend lull, whether initiated by Egypt or the prime minister, and in any case to the dismay of Channel 2's Roni Daniel and the IDF, will lead to a radical change.

Everything must be done to win Gilad Shalit's release.
What we are doing now in Gaza has nothing to do with
freeing him. It is a widescale act of vengeance, the kind
that the IDF and Shin Bet have wanted to conduct for some
time, mostly motivated by the deep frustration that the
army commanders feel about their impotence against the
Qassams and the daring Palestinian guerilla raid. There's
a huge gap between the army unleashing its frustration and
a clever and legitimate operation to free the kidnapped soldier.

To prevent the army from running as amok as it would like,
a strong and judicious political echelon is required. But facing off against the frustrated army is Ehud Olmert and Amir Peretz's tyro regime, weak and happless. Until the weekend lull, it appeared that each step proposed by the army and Shin Bet had been immediately approved for backing. That does not bode well, not only for the chances of freeing Shalit, but also for the future management of the government, which is being revealed to be as weak as the Hamas government.

The only wise and restrained voice heard so far was that
of the soldier's father, Noam Shalit, of all people. That
noble man called at what is clearly his most difficult
hour, not for stridency and not for further damage done to
the lives of soldiers and innocent Palestinians. Against
the background of the IDF's unrestrained actions and the arrogant bragging of the latest macho spokesmen, Maj. Gen. Yoav Gallant of the Southern Command and Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Gilad, Shalit's father's voice stood out like a voice crying in the wilderness.

Sending tens of thousands of miserable inhabitants running
from their homes, dozens of kilometers from where his son
is supposedly hidden, and cutting off the electricity to hundreds of thousands of others, is certainly not what he meant in his understated emotional pleas. It's a shame nobody is listening to him, of all people.

The legitimate basis for the IDF's operation was stripped
away the moment it began. It's no accident that nobody
mentions the day before the attack on the Kerem Shalom
fort, when the IDF kidnapped two civilians, a doctor and
his brother, from their home in Gaza. The difference
between us and them? We kidnapped civilians and they
captured a soldier, we are a state and they are a terror organization. How ridiculously pathetic Amos Gilad sounds when he says that the capture of Shalit was "illegitimate and illegal," unlike when the IDF grabs civilians from their homes. How can a senior official in the defense ministry claim that "the head of the snake" is in Damascus, when the IDF uses the exact same methods?

True, when the IDF and Shin Bet grab civilians from their
homes - and they do so often - it is not to murder them
later. But sometimes they are killed on the doorsteps of
their homes, although it is not necessary, and sometimes
they are grabbed to serve as "bargaining chips," like in Lebanon and now, with the Palestinian legislators. What an uproar there would be if the Palestinians had grabbed half the members of the Israeli government. How would we label them?

Collective punishment is illegitimate and it does not have
a smidgeon of intelligence. Where will the inhabitants of
Beit Hanun run? With typical hardheartedness the military reporters say they were not "expelled" but that it was "recommended" they leave, for the benefit, of course, of those running for their lives. And what will this inhumane step lead to? Support for the Israeli government? Their enlistment as informants and collaborators for the Shin Bet? Can the miserable farmers of Beit Hanun and Beit Lahia do anything about the Qassam rocket-launching cells? Will bombing an already destroyed airport do anything to free the soldier or was it just to decorate the headlines?

Did anyone think about what would have happened if Syrian planes had managed to down one of the Israeli planes that brazenly buzzed their president's palace? Would we have declared war on Syria? Another "legitimate war"? Will the blackout of Gaza bring down the Hamas government or cause the population to rally around it? And even if the Hamas government falls, as Washington wants, what will happen on the day after? These are questions for which nobody has any real answers. As usual here: Quiet, we're shooting. But this time we are not only shooting. We are bombing and shelling, darkening and destroying, imposing a siege and kidnapping like the worst of terrorists and nobody breaks the silence to ask, what the hell for, and according to what right?

Nu de Nederlandse commerciele massamedia nagenoeg zwijgen over de Israelische terreur in Gaza zijn we afhankelijk van internet en de Israelische Britse kwaliteitskranten. Zie: http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1811307,00.html

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/733697.html