De Israelische Terreur 1063

Leest u dit nog eens goed:

In a letter to the Swedish prime minister, Congressmen Robert Wexler (D-FL) and Elton Gallegly (R-CA), members on the United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, wrote:. "Given the far-reaching implications for this article, which raises the unfortunate specter of similar blood libels and spurious charges that have been directed at Jews throughout the centuries, it is critical that your government unequivocally repudiate and reject the heinous allegations expressed in this article," "It is essential that this vitriolic article not be used by anti-Semites, anti-Israel advocates, and extremists as an excuse to commit acts of violence and terrorism against the Jewish community in Sweden or internationally? the letter stated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftonbl...el_controversy

Deze link werkt niet meer, maar deze nog wel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Aftonbladet_Israel_controversy

Interessant is deze zin: '"Given the far-reaching implications for this article, which raises the unfortunate specter of similar blood libels and spurious charges that have been directed at Jews throughout the centuries, it is critical that your government unequivocally repudiate and reject the heinous allegations expressed in this article."

Hier roepen twee Amerikaanse volksvertegenwoordigers de Zweedse regering op in te grijpen, terwijl nu is komen vast ter staan dat de beschuldigingen van orgaanroof juist zijn. Het gevolg is dat deze absurde vergelijking in een merkwaardig daglicht komt te staan: 'Given the far-reaching implications for this article, which raises the unfortunate specter of similar blood libels and spurious charges that have been directed at Jews throughout the centuries...' Wat wordt hier nu precies bedoeld? Dat de misdadige politiek van de staat Israel hetzelfde is als de eeuwenoude christelijke jodenhaat? Laten westerse politici in godsnaam een toontje lager zingen. En welke consequenties trekken Congressmen Robert Wexler (D-FL) and Elton Gallegly (R-CA) uit hun opmerking nu blijkt dat er wel degelijk sprake is van orgaanroof?

En ook deze zin komt in een heel wonderlijk daglicht te staan: 'It is essential that this vitriolic article not be used by anti-Semites, anti-Israel advocates, and extremists as an excuse to commit acts of violence and terrorism against the Jewish community in Sweden or internationally? the letter stated.'

Hoe nu, nu orgaanroof bewezen is? Kan dit feit nu wel 'be used by anti-Semites, anti-Israel advocates, and extremists as an excuse to commit acts of violence and terrorism against the Jewish community in Sweden or internationally?' Wat moeten we aan met deze politieke wartaal? Of was deze onzin alleen bedoeld om te voorkomen dat deze vorm van Israelische terreur bekend zou worden?