donderdag 4 december 2014

Tom Engelhardt 72

December 4, 2014

Tomgram: Engelhardt, War to the Horizon

Note for TomDispatch Readers: My thanks to those of you who recently contributed $100 (or more) to this website in return for a signed, personalized copy of the new hardcover edition (with two extra essays added!) of Rebecca Solnit’s indie bestseller, Men Explain Things to Me.  The offer will remain open for just a few more days, so if you meant to get a copy, hustle to our donation page ASAP. Available there as well, is my new book, Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World. My gratitude to TD readers who are still sending in donations for it. A little end-of-the-year infusion of cash is, believe me, a big help for this site.

P.S. Today’s post is a companion piece to my previous essay, "Iraq 4.0?" Tom]


Party On! 
The War Party Ascendant

 
By Tom Engelhardt


It was the end of the road for Chuck Hagel last week and the Washington press corps couldn’t have been more enthusiastic about writing his obituary.  In terms of pure coverage, it may not have been Ferguson or the seven-foot deluge of snow that hit Buffalo, New York, but the avalanche of news reports was nothing to be sniffed at.  There had been a changing of the guard in wartime Washington.  Barack Obama’s third secretary of defense had gone down for the count.  In thephrase of the moment, he had “resigned under pressure.”  Sayonara, Chuck!

With a unanimity that crossed political lines, the accounts read as if written by a single reporter. The story went something like this: two years earlier, President Obama had brought in Hagel, a decorated Vietnam War veteran and former Republican senator with a reputation for being leery about the overuse of American military power, to wind down the war in Afghanistan, rein in military critics, and put the Pentagon budget on something closer to a peacetime footing.  After a bruising Senate confirmation hearing from which he never recovered, he proved poor at “messaging” the president’s policies, had a “crappy relationship” with National Security Adviser (and Obama buddy) Susan Rice, proved a weak manager at the Department of Defense as well as a “weak link” in the Obama national security team, and could never break into the president's tight-knit circle of insiders who -- everyone agreed -- had a nasty habit of “micromanaging” America’s wars (rather than, it seemed, letting the military do what needed to be done).  In the end, the president “lost confidence” in him.  It was a “mutual” firing or at least Hagel had advanced somewhat voluntarily toward the edge of the cliff before being pushed off.

subcategory of Hagel reports also bloomedagain adding up to something like a single story.  In them, various journalists and commentators offered instant speculation on whom the president would invite to fill Hagel’s post.  Topping everyone’s “short list”: Senator and former Army Ranger Jack Reed of Rhode Island, war fightin’ liberal and former Pentagon official Michèle Flournoy (much beloved by neocons and Republicans), and hawkish former Pentagon “weapons buyer” Ashton Carter (the ultimate nominee).  Unfortunately for the press, Reed and Flournoy promptly made mincemeat out of the collective wisdom of the moment, emphatically removing their names from consideration.  Politico reportedthe Flournoy rejection this way: “Flournoy’s withdrawal comes amid speculation President Barack Obama is looking for a candidate who would be deferential to a White House that’s increasingly exerting control over Pentagon decisions.”  Nothing, however, could stop the march of the news, whose focus simply switchedto other potential job applicants.  Striking was the eagerness of assorted journalists and pundits to act like employment agency headhunters vetting exactly the same list of candidates for the president.

Such journalism, of course, qualifies as the very definition of insiderdom and it led, implicitly or explicitly, to the crowning of Barack Obama as a “war president” for the final two years of his term.  In the end, however, the media was less reporting on developments than reproducing them.  The result: a record as collectively claustrophobic as post-9/11 Washington itself.
These days, it’s often pointed out by those who pass for Washington critics of the Obama administration that the crises are backing up like a Thanksgiving traffic jam across a remarkable swath of the planet -- and that the president’s national security team has proven “dysfunctional” when it comes to dealing with them.  It's seldom acknowledged, however, that the most essential crisis isn’t in Ukraine or Iraq or Syria or Afghanistan or Iran, but in Washington. There, a bankrupt 13-year-old policy of war to the horizon remains, unbelievably enough, in the ascendancy and “war fever” seems to be breaking out yet again.

In this context, it's curious that four crucial aspects of war, American-style, were missing from the blitz of Hagel reportage. Here's a rundown.




Geen opmerkingen:

Peter Flik en Chuck Berry-Promised Land

mijn unieke collega Peter Flik, die de vrijzinnig protestantse radio omroep de VPRO maakte is niet meer. ik koester duizenden herinneringen ...