Beste Maarten Schinkel,
Lees dit eens en stel jezelf de vraag waarom jij nooit dit soort vragen stelt.
Bill Moyers: Was the Financial Bailout Just a Slick, Friendly Takeover of the Federal Government?
We're Still Not Safe From the Back-Alley Dealings That Lead to Our Economic Meltdown
Lagan Sebert, Ben Protess
8 Shocking Ways the Billionaires Have Schemed to Rob Us of Every Last $
Mark Ames
Who Ran Away with Your 401K?
James Ridgeway
Everything Is Bright and Sunny Again, Unless You Have to Work for a Living
Dean Baker
The Economic Revolution Is Already Happening -- It's Just Not on Wall St.
Maria Armoudian
Bill Moyers: I sat in a theater packed with passionate moviegoers, every one of them seemingly aghast at the Wall Street skullduggery exposed by Michael Moore in his latest film. It's called 'Capitalism: A Love Story.' Here's an excerpt:
Michael Moore: We're here to get the money back for the American People. Do you think it's too harsh to call what has happened here a coup d'etat? A financial coup d'etat?
Marcy Kaptur: That's, no. Because I think that's what's happened. Um, a financial coup d'etat?
Moore: Yeah.
Kaptur: I could agree with that. I could agree with that. Because the people here really aren't in charge. Wall Street is in charge.
Moyers: That's the progressive Representative from Ohio, Marcy Kaptur, she's with me now. She has a Masters from the University of Michigan, did graduate study at M.I.T. and still lives in the same house in the Toledo working class neighborhood where she grew up.
She's in her 14th term in Congress, the longest-serving Democratic woman in the history of the House, and she's an outspoken financial watchdog on three important Committees: Appropriations, Budget and Oversight and Government Reform.
Also with me is a familiar face to viewers of this broadcast. Simon Johnson is the former Chief Economist at the International Monetary Fund. He now teaches Global Economics and Management at M.I.T.'s Sloan School of Management. He's one of the founders of the website Baselinescenario.com. I check it out daily for Simon's take on the economic and financial crisis.
It's been a year since the great collapse and both my guests are well equipped to assess what's happened since then. Welcome to you both.
Kaptur: Thank you.
Moyers: Let's look at this story that I just read from the Associated Press this week about how Treasury Secretary Geithner is on the phone several times a day with a select group of very powerful Wall Street bankers, especially Citigroup, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs. He will talk to them when Members of Congress have to leave a message on the answering machine. And these are the bankers who helped bring on this calamity and who are now benefiting from it. What does that say to you?
Kaptur: That says to me that Wall Street and Washington is a circuit. And because Mr. Geithner headed the New York Fed that that historic relationship, unfortunately, continues. And it gives them special access and special power to influence policy.
Simon Johnson: Well, I think it really tells you how the system works. The system is based on access and is based on what on Wall Street shaping Washington's view of what's important.
It's the people who are very close to Mr. Geithner before when he was the head of the New York Fed. Before he became Treasury Secretary. These people have unparalleled access. And in a crisis, when everything is up for grabs, you don't know what's going on, the people who will take your phone calls, right, in government and people who are going to be standing in the oval office, making the key decisions. That's the heart of the system. That's the heart of how you get your agenda through, by changing their worldview.
Kaptur: And they also move people. In other words, Mr. Geithner came from the New York Fed, he came from Wall Street, and he becomes Secretary of the Treasury. His predecessor, Mr. Paulson, came from Goldman Sachs, and he becomes Secretary of Treasury. You can go back decades, and you will see that there's this revolving door between Wall Street and Washington. And I recently asked Chairman Bernanke of the Federal Reserve, 'Let me ask you a question. Would you be willing to consider a reform where the Cleveland Fed would have equal power to the New York Fed, in terms of how the Fed is run?' And his answer was, 'No.'
Moyers: And why did you ask that question?
Kaptur: Because I think we need to democratize the Fed. I think that my region of the country, which is suffering so heavily from these decisions that were made by Wall Street and Washington, we need to have voice. And our bankers, who didn't do the bad things, our community bankers, who are having to pay higher fees shouldn't be treated this way. Why should the people who did it right be penalized for those that did it wrong?
Lees verder: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/143209/
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten