De Pro Israel Lobby 4

De pro-Israel lobby in de Verenigde Staten heeft furieus gereageerd op een wetenschappelijke publicatie over de disporportionele invloed die deze lobby heeft op de Amerikaanse buitenlandse politiek. En zoals gebruikelijk wordt ook nu weer het aloude argument 'anti-semitisme' van stal gehaald om kritische analytici te criminaliseren en de feiten te negeren. De Guardian bericht: 'US professors accused of being liars and bigots over essay on pro-Israeli lobby Julian Borger in Washington. An article by two prominent American professors arguing that the pro-Israel lobby exerts a dominant and damaging influence on US foreign policy has triggered a furious row, pitting allegations of anti-semitism against claims of intellectual intimidation. Stephen Walt, the academic dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, and John Mearsheimer, a political science professor at the University of Chicago, published two versions of the essay, the Israel Lobby, in the London Review of Books and on a Harvard website. The pro-Israel lobby and its sway over American policy has always been a controversial issue, but the professors' bluntly worded polemic created a firestorm, drawing condemnation from left and right of the political spectrum. Professor Walt's fellow Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz - criticised in the article as an "apologist" for Israel - denounced the authors as "liars" and "bigots" in the university newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, and compared their arguments to neo-Nazi literature. "Accusations of powerful Jews behind the scenes are part of the most dangerous traditions of modern anti-semitism," wrote two fellow academics, Jeffrey Herf and Andrei Markovits, in a letter to the London Review of Books. Critics also pointed out that the article had been praised by David Duke, a notorious American white supremacist. Prof Mearsheimer said the storm of protest proved one of its arguments - that the strength of the pro-Israel lobby stifled debate on US foreign policy. "We argued in the piece that the lobby goes to great lengths to silence criticism of Israeli policy as well as the US-Israeli relationship, and that its most effective weapon is the charge of anti-semitism," Prof Mearsheimer told The Guardian. "Thus, we expected to be called anti-semites, even though both of us are philo-semites and strongly support the existence of Israel." He added: "Huge numbers of people know this story to be true but are afraid to say it because they would punished by pro-Israeli forces."' Lee verder: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1743767,00.html Zou het anti-semitisch zijn om te schrijven dat de arme kinderen in de Verenigde Staten de armste kinderen zijn van alle geindustrialiseerde naties op die van Israel en Ierland na? Dit zijn gedocumenteerde feiten, maar toch, zou dit anti- semitisch zijn of anti-Amerikaans? Of anti-Iers? Of alles tegelijk? Het zijn verwarrende tijden.