• All governments lie, but disaster lies in wait for countries whose officials smoke the same hashish they give out.

  • I.F. Stone

woensdag 28 september 2016

MH17 Mystery

Russian-Made Missile Downed MH17: Investigators

It was fired from territory held by pro-Russia rebels, international prosecutors say.

 09/28/2016 07:40 am ET | Updated 2 hours ago
The prosecutors cannot file charges but victims’ relatives have been seeking details of who shot the plane down in the hope that it might lead eventually to prosecutions over an incident which led to a sharp rise in East-West tensions.
The Buk missile system used to shoot down the plane fired one missile from the village of Pervomaysk and was later returned to Russia, said the prosecutors, from the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Malaysia and Ukraine.
They told a news conference in the central Dutch city of Nieuwegein that the investigative team had identified 100 people who were described as being of interest to them but had not yet been formally identified individual suspects.
It was not clear whether an order had been given for fighters to launch the missile or whether they had acted independently, the prosecutors said.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
The Joint Investigation Team discuss the preliminary results of the probe into the downing of Malaysia Airlines jetliner flight MH17 at a press conference in Nieuwegein, Netherlands, Wednesday.

RUSSIA REJECTS FINDINGS

A civilian investigation by the Dutch Safety Board also concluded last year thatMH17 was hit by a Buk missile fired from eastern Ukraine, but Moscow denied that pro-Russian rebels were responsible.
Repeating those denials on Wednesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “First-hand radar data identified all flying objects which could have been launched or were in the air over the territory controlled by rebels at that moment.”
“The data are clear-cut... there is no rocket. If there was a rocket, it could only have been fired from elsewhere,” he said.
The investigators said they had not had access to the new radar images on which Moscow was basing its latest statements.
Victims’ families were informed of the findings shortly before the prosecutors’ news conference.
At the time of the incident on July 17, 2014, pro-Russian separatists were fighting Ukrainian government forces in the region. The Boeing 777 broke apart in mid-air, flinging wreckage over several kilometers (miles) of fields in rebel-held territory.
Prosecutors cannot file charges because there is no international agreement on what court a case would be heard in.
KOEN VAN WEEL VIA GETTY IMAGES
Relatives of the MH17 victims arrive at the NBC Congress centre in Nieuwegein on Wednesday.

RELATIVES WANT DETAILS

Speaking before the news conference, Silene Fredriksz, whose 23-year-old son Bryce was on the airplane with his girlfriend, Daisy Oehlers, said the victims’ families wanted justice.
“As a family we are impatient. We want to know what happened, how it happened and why. We want those responsible to face justice,” she said.
The downing played a significant part in a decision by the European Union and United States to impose sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine conflict.
Ukrainian and Western officials, citing intelligence intercepts, have blamed pro-Russian rebels for the incident.
Russia has always denied direct involvement in the Ukraine conflict and rejects responsibility for the destruction of MH17.
Prosecutors have sought legal assistance from Moscow since October 2014, and visited in person for a week in July.
“Russian authorities have offered information in the past, but have not answered all questions,” they said in a statement at the time.

2 opmerkingen:

  1. Fransje 'de apologist' Timmermans kan wel huilen van geluk dat de Russen 'het gedaan hebben'.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  2. Zie ook: MH17 jit investigation
    Met Laszlo Maracz, assistent-professor European Studies aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam: "Dutch-led team accepted secret US data on MH17 crash, rejected transparent Russian analysis." ... "Dutch-led researchers drew conclusions from a one-sided deterministic approach" ... "an independent tribunal would have avoided conflict of interest".

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen