• All governments lie, but disaster lies in wait for countries whose officials smoke the same hashish they give out.

  • I.F. Stone

dinsdag 11 april 2017

Crazy Men Are in Power

5 opmerkingen:

  1. Fact Check? De BBC,CNN,NOS, ja zelfs(?)George Monbiot heeft het over de luchtaanval met chemische wapens van Assad.Nou ja "zelfs"? Werkt voor The Guardian.......
    "1. We can be 99% sure the chemical weapons attack came from Syrian govt
    2. Airstrikes are not the answer "

    1. Lack of Fact Check,George Monbiot etc....http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-the-latest-claims-against-assad-are-a-pack-of-lies/5584556

    2. "As investigative reporter Robert Parry, who broke many of the Iran-Contra stories, argued:

      “Since Assad’s forces have gained a decisive upper-hand over the rebels, why would he risk stirring up international outrage at this juncture? On the other hand, the desperate rebels might view the horrific scenes from the chemical-weapons deployment as a last-minute game-changer.” "

      "the analysis of former DIA colonel, Patrick Lang Donald who, on April 7, 2017 said:

      “Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie. In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib. Here is what happened:

      The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.

      The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.

      The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site. It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.

      There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.

      We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.

    3. "The inability of mainstream journalists to undertake basic fact-checking illuminated by the examples described, reinforce the veracity of Ulfkotte’s claims that corporate journalists are “educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public.” But more than that, it amounts to a stark admission that the corruption at the heart of the elite media and political establishment is systemic. As Mark Doran on Twitter put it: “Our corrupt politics, our international crime, and our ‘free media’ form a seamless whole.” The goal of this consolidation of power is to secure yet another middle east resource grab."

    4. meer George Monbiot onzin :
      "Those insisting the Syrian govt was not responsible for the CW attack should ask themselves whose planes dropped it."
      "I wonder what it would take to convince you:"