Zoeken in deze blog 🔎🔎

zaterdag 18 juli 2020

The West Faces a Deep Crisis of Liberty

Episode #332 – ‘Taking Liberties’ with special guest Richard Grannon and more


Episode #332 of SUNDAY WIRE SHOW resumes on this week, July 5, 2020 with host Patrick Henningsen, broadcasting LIVE on the Alternate Current Radio Network (ACR)…

LISTEN LIVE ON THIS PAGE – START TIMES:

5pm-8pm UK Time | 12pm-3pm EST (US) | 9am-12pm PST (US)

This week the SUNDAY WIRE broadcasts LIVE on ACR with host Patrick Henningsen covering the top stories in the US, Europe and internationally. American Independence Day weekend has not been without its political drama, and we’ll delve into some of the controversial stories topping the headlines over the past few days as the West faces a deep crisis of liberty. Later, in the first hour, we’re joined by a very special guest – UK-based public speaker, personal coach and content creator, Richard Grannon, to discuss the psychological impact of the COVID Lockdown on individuals and society as a whole. In the final segment we’ll connect with SUNDAY WIRE Roving Correspondent for Culture & Sport, Basil Valentine for the latest on Britain’s New Normal and other world events we need to know about. All this and much, much more. Enjoy the show…

*NOTE: THIS EPISODE MAY CONTAIN STRONG LANGUAGE AND MATURE THEMES*

https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/07/05/episode-332-taking-liberties-with-special-guest-richard-grannon/




White Helmets Implicated in Fraud Scandal

White Helmets Implicated in Cash Embezzlement and Fraud Scandal

Any time you see the White Helmets in the news these days, it’s probably going to be for all the wrong reasons. This latest bombshell is no exception.

As 21WIRE has previously noted, this “urban search and rescue” organisation claims to be “impartial” in the Syrian conflict, even though it has receive nearly all of its support and money from Western governments, and has only ever operate in ‘rebel’ terrorist-occupied pockets in Syria. Incredibly, even though they are non-existent in Syria proper, the group is solicits cash donations from the public on their website.

As of April 2018, this organisation has claimed to have saved over 114,000 lives, and yet have never once released any records of proof of this wild claim.

But it’s claims like this which have been used to elevate the group’s public image and to pull in hundreds of millions of dollars in financial support and government patronage from the West.

Many have asked: where does all the money go? We’re told that all of the proceeds received are being funneled through a front organisation called Mayday Rescue, based in the Netherlands. However, beyond this, it is difficult to get a clear picture of group’s total financial expenditures since 2013. These are extremely large sums indeed, which left many unanswered questions.

Fortunately, this latest shocking embezzlement scandal may begin to provide some crucial answers.

NL Times reports…

According to the newspaper, Le Mesurier received 50 thousand dollars in cash for Operation Flying Carpet in on 17 July 2018. Four days later, around 100 White Helmets and their family members were smuggled out of Syria when Syrian president Bashar al-Assad reconquered parts of southern Syria. As the White Helmets rescued people from bombings by the Assad regime, it was feared that they would be in danger of captivity, torture and death in areas he controlled.

But fewer White Helmets could be rescued than hoped, the Volkskrant wrote, because the largest part of the 50 thousand dollars Le Mesurier took from the Mayday safe in Istanbul was not used for the rescue. And after that the money disappeared.”

James Le Mesurier in Istanbul.

In the spring of 2019, a British accountant asked for an explanation and received receipts from Le Mesurier showing that after the evacuation from Jordan, the money was handed over to another manager, who signed for it. After that Mayday established an Emergency Operation Center in Istanbul, in case more rescue workers had to be rescued, and the money is there in a safe. The British accountant accepted this, as there were receipts and all.

But when the Dutch accountant went to check in November 2019, he found that the money was missing and the receipts were fake. An involved employee told him that Le Mesurier asked that he and a colleague sign backdated receipts. The accountant met with Le Mesurier to ask him about it, and he acknowledged fraud, according to the Volkskrant. The money went into “remuneration benefits” – money he and fellow directors Emma Winberg (also his wife) and Rupert Davis paid out every month on top of their salaries. The accountant confirmed that the 50 thousand dollars went into the books as a personal bonus for Le Mesurier and advised the man to get a forensic accountant look at the books to investigate the risk of self-enrichment.

The next day, November 8, Le Mesurier wrote an email to the donor countries, admitting that the 50 thousand dollars disappeared as a result of “fraud”, but adding that there was never any malicious intent. “I take full and sole responsibility for that,” he wrote, according to the newspaper. He discussed his fears for a second investigation by a forensic accountant, that this may reveal “errors and internal failures” that could play into the hands of “Russia and the pro-Assad trolls.” He left the choice of how to proceed up to the donor countries, adding that he is willing to step down from Mayday if they require it and pay back any wrong expenses.

On Monday, November 11, Le Mesurier was found dead. He died in a fall from his and Winberg’s apartment above the Mayday offices in Istanbul. The Turkish police spoke to his widow and concluded that he most likely took his own life.

***
21WIRE says…

What’s also crucial about this latest revelation is that members of the UK mainstream media establishment sought to blame a melange of external actors for the untimely death of Le Mesurier. At the time, such speculation was rife, as British mainstream journalists were openly drifting out loose talk of ‘state actors’ like Syria or Russia being responsible – even though Turkish authorities had already leaned towards suicide. Incredibly, top mainstream establishment pundits also attempted to blame Le Mesurier’s death as the result of a nefarious ‘Russian information campaign’ and insinuated that any dissenting alternative media coverage of him and the White Helmets was somehow being “a prelude to murder.” This very accusation was made at the time by BBC’s diplomatic, defence and Newsnight editor, Mark Urban:

Were these mainstream media journalists and other likely embedded intelligence mouthpieces, attempting to create a smokescreen at the time in order to deflect from the real scandal of financial malfeasance by the lauded White Helmets leadership? This does indeed seem to be the case after seeing these latest Dutch revelations.

At the time of the incident, former Army colleague of Le Mesurier, Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, was doing the rounds in mainstream media, dropping in various inuendos and talking points. Among other things, Hamish de Bretton-Gordon is also director of the Doctors Under Fire campaign group. He said this to Forces.net:

“I know James got a lot of direct vitriol from these people, as do a lot of us who are trying to help on the humanitarian side in Syria, but the White Helmets were the focus of much of the angst and derision from the Russians and the Syrians, and as the head of that organisation, I’m sure he got more of that than most.”

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon is also the UK media’s ‘go-to’ source on anything chemical weapons related, and helped to shape the narrative on most of the high-profile chemical attacks’ attributed to the ‘Assad regime’ in Syria, including the alleged attacks in Khan Sheikhoun and Douma. It was later proven through a series of leaked documents and whistleblower testimonies from members of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) based in The Hague, Netherlands – that Douma’s alleged ‘chemical attack’ was in fact a hoax, perpetrated in part by the White Helmets themselves. Not surprisingly, just as most US and UK officials have suddenly gone quiet on this issue, Hamish de Bretton-Gordon rarely comments on Douma anymore.

With this in mind, it’s important to note the scale and scope of the White Helmets public relations campaigning – all which is essentially designed to protect its fundraising ability. Since its inception in late 2013, it is clear that just through the known funding it had received from its main funders the US and UK governments, along with EU state funding and Gulf states like Qatar – that this supposed ‘search and rescue’ group has received well in excess of $200 million. If you added it all up, including solicited donations from the public, this may top a quarter of a billion dollars. Many have asked the question: where did all of the money go? Not surprisingly, both donor governments and media seem to be disinterested in this question. In 2018, when the wider public, and even the Trump White House too, began to really cop onto the fact that the White Helmets weren’t really what they were being marketed as, the press began running media cover pieces like, “UK may increase aid to Syrian White Helmets after Trump pulls funding.” 

So aside from a motivation by Western mainstream media and politicians to protect the White Helmets’ image as a truthful source of information (in reality, they produced visual propaganda which was used to bolster the US, UK and Turkish-led proxy war against Damascus) coming out of Syria, there was also a clear financial motivation for its principle actors to protect its reputation and image.

Will this be the final death knell for this dubious propaganda vehicle created and funded by Western governments?

Clearly, their days are numbered. Presently, the White Helmets are only operating in the small Al-Qaeda-occupied province of Idlib in northern Syria. They also have offices in Turkey but these are mainly concerned with producing and disseminating images for western audiences.

Because of their overt western backing, along with the painful fact never reported in Western media – that they have only ever operated in Al Nusra/HTS/Al Qaeda controlled areas in Syria – the White Helmets are not liked, nor welcome by the Syrian population as a whole. Hence, their only support resides in the West and from other regional actors like Turkey, Israel and Gulf States, who themselves are engaged in destablising Syria and trying to overthrow the government in Damascus.

https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/07/18/white-helmets-implicated-in-cash-embezzlement-and-fraud-scandal/

vrijdag 17 juli 2020

Ghislaine Maxwell On 'Suicide Watch'

Ghislaine Maxwell On Suicide Watch As Her Victim’s Lawyers Worry She Wont Make It Out Alive

Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

(TMU) – As soon as Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested earlier this week, speculation began to spread online about the potential of her ending up dead behind bars just like her former associate Jeffrey Epstein.According to many victims and witnesses, Maxwell was heavily involved in Epstein’s child trafficking network and knows some of the most private transgressions of some of the pair’s most famous associates, including Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton, among others.

There are some researchers and sources close to the case who believe that Epstein was actually assassinated and that his life was taken to protect the secrets of his powerful friends. If there is any truth to this theory, Maxwell’s life could be in danger as well, especially since she is believed to be cooperating with authorities.

In an interview with The Sun, Epstein’s former employer Steven Hoffenberg said that Maxwell ‘knows everything’ and will ‘totally co-operate’ after her arrest.

Hoffenberg, said that ‘there’s a lot of people very worried’ about what Maxwell could tell investigators, noting that Prince Andrew is especially worried.

She’s going to cooperate and be very important. Andrew is definitely, definitely concerned,” Hoffenberg said.

Spencer Kuvin, an attorney for several Epstein victims, told The Daily Mail that he thinks she will die behind bars.

Further Reading; https://themindunleashed.com/2020/07/ghislaine-maxwell-on-suicide-watch-as-her-victims-lawyers-worry-she-wont-make-it-out-alive.html












‘Tsunami’ of Evictions Could Make 28 Million Americans Homeless

‘Tsunami’ of Evictions Could Make 28 Million Americans Homeless This Summer Alone

Get the latest from The Mind Unleashed in your inbox. Sign up right here.

(TMU) – With the pandemic continuing to sink its claws into the United States, economic conditions have also failed to improve for millions of people. As a result, nearly one-third U.S. households – representing 32 percent – have still not made their full housing payments for the month of July, according to a survey from online rental platform Apartment List.

And with public health experts warning people to continue to “Stay at Home,”the slogan is taking on a perverse new meaning as humanitarian disaster looms for some 28 million people in the U.S. who are facing eviction and homelessness in the immediate future.

About 19 percent of those surveyed were unable to make any housing payment in the first week of the month, while 13 percent paid a portion of their rent or mortgage.

The numbers represent the grim fact that for four months now, a “historically high” amount of U.S. households have been unable to pay their housing bill, either on time or in full. It also represents an increase from 30 percent in June and 31 percent in June.

According to Apartment List, those most likely to miss their payments were younger, low-income, or renters. Other experts warn that Black and Latino families face the highest risk of eviction. They also may be entering the start of a rapid and vicious cycle, the report suggests.

“Delayed payments in one month are a strong predictor for missed payments in the next,” Apartment List says. Indeed, 83 percent of households who paid the entirety of their May housing costs in a timely way did the same in June, but only 30 percent of households who were late in May did so in June.

As the economic crisis continues to spiral unabated, tens of millions of Americans continue to survive on unemployment while their economic stimulus checks have long been gone.

Further Reading:

https://themindunleashed.com/2020/07/tsunami-of-evictions-could-make-28-million-americans-homeless-this-summer-alone.html



How Anti-Russian Propaganda Works

How Anti-Russian Propaganda Works

Russia is trying to “steal” vaccine research rather than “access life-saving information that should be the collective property of humanity.” 

Everybody looks like the hero in their own story, not the villain. The baddies don’t know they’re the baddies. This simple and obvious truth is absolutely critical to remember if you want to understand the world. From within a country, its actions often look noble and decent, but to those on the receiving end, those same actions look like atrocities. This is one of the central themes in Noam Chomsky’s 50-year body of political writing, which critics tend to think of as “anti-American,” but which actually returns over and over to a central point: if we apply the same standards to evaluating the United States as we do to evaluating other countries, then we too are guilty of “terrorism,” “war crimes,” and “genocide.” But we prefer to have two separate standards: one for looking at what we do (the best motives assumed, everything treated as “well-intentioned” even if it results in catastrophe) and another for looking at what our “enemies” do (the worst and most selfish motives assumed, everything treated as malicious). 

A few examples: The Vietnam War is treated in U.S. accounts as a well-meaning blunder intended to help, but if any other country did what we had done we would think of it as a mass-murdering invasion. If another country assassinated one of our highest-ranking military officials we would consider it a criminal act of war, but if we assassinate one of their military officials we are merely punishing “terrorism” and expect them not to retaliate. If our politically-appointed Supreme Court makes a decision, it is legitimate law, but the high court in a socialist Latin American government must be “stuffed with political cronies.” And, of course, if Russia tries to intervene in our elections, it is a rogue state, but if we intervene in elections across the world (including Russia’s), it is simply because we care so much about democracy and human rights. 

Today’s news contains one of the most egregious examples I have ever seen of nationalistic bias leading to moral imbecility. We should examine it closely because it offers a critical lesson in how ideology filters its way into the media, and how information is presented in ways that turn the truth on its head. It is a story about Russia hacking the computers of medical research facilities in the United States, Britain, and Canada in order to “steal” data that could help Russia develop a Coronavirus vaccine. Let us see how the New York Times presents things. I am going to excerpt some big chunks because there are a few things that happen in the text that are worthy of being discussed: 

Russian hackers are attempting to steal coronavirus vaccine research, the American, British and Canadian governments said Thursday, accusing the Kremlin of opening a new front in its spy battles with the West amid the worldwide competition to contain the pandemic… [A] hacking group implicated in the 2016 break-ins into Democratic Party servers has been trying to steal intelligence on vaccines from universities, companies and other health care organizations. The group, associated with Russian intelligence and known as both APT29 and Cozy Bear, has sought to exploit the chaos created by the coronavirus pandemic, officials said.

… American intelligence officials said the Russians were aiming to steal research to develop their own vaccine more quickly, not to sabotage other countries’ efforts. There was likely little immediate damage to global public health, cybersecurity experts said. The Russian espionage nevertheless signals a new kind of competition between Moscow and Washington akin to Cold War spies stealing technological secrets during the space race generations ago…. The American government has previously warned about efforts by China and Iran to steal vaccine research…

[T]he primary target of the attacks appeared to be Oxford University in Britain and the British-Swedish pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca, which have been jointly working on a vaccine, said Robert Hannigan, the former head of G.C.H.Q., the British intelligence agency. Oxford scientists said on Thursday that they had noticed a surprising resemblance between their vaccine approach and the work that Russian scientists had reported.

Though Russia could be seeking to steal the vaccine data to bolster its own research, it could also be trying to avoid relying on Western countries for any eventual coronavirus vaccine. … While AstraZeneca has announced it will make the Oxford vaccine available at cost, governments and philanthropies have paid huge sums to the company to secure their place in line, even without any guarantee it will work. The United States has said it will pay up to $1.2 billion to AstraZeneca to fund a clinical trial and secure 300 million doses. Russia could find itself near the back of the line if the vaccine proves successful. “Russia clearly doesn’t want to disrupt vaccine production, but they don’t want to be dependent on the U.S. or the U.K. for production and discovery of the vaccine,” said Mr. Hannigan, now an executive at the BlueVoyant cybersecurity firm. “It not impossible [sic] to think Kremlin pride is such that they don’t want that to happen.”An intense international race is underway to develop a vaccine for the coronavirus that has already killed 580,000 people and upended daily life around the world.

… Laura Rosenberger, a former Obama administration official who now leads the Alliance for Securing Democracy, [said] “But there’s no question that whoever gets to a vaccine first thinks they will have geopolitical advantage, and that’s something I’d expect Russia to want.”

Let’s note a few things here: first, American intelligence officials admit openly that Russia is not trying to sabotage the vaccine development efforts of the United States and the United Kingdom, which would of course be a monstrous act. Instead, they are “trying to develop their own vaccine more quickly.” Far down the article, a former NSA computer scientist and cybersecurity expert acknowledges that “[t]he potential harm here is limited to commercial harm, to companies that are devoting a lot of their own resources into developing a vaccine in hopes it will be financially rewarding down the road.”

So: Russia is trying to access information that can be used to develop a coronavirus vaccine more quickly. If they succeed in this act of “theft,” they are not going to harm U.S./U.K. research. What they are going to do is harm the “commercial” interests of U.S./U.K.-based corporations. The article also says that if the U.S./U.K. develop the vaccine first, Russia will not have equal access to it but will be at the “back of the line,” even though its hospitals are currently being pushed to capacity and it has had 750,000 cases of the virus, one of the hardest-hit countries in the world. (It should go without saying that the story does not discuss whether the United States or United Kingdom have engaged in any intellectual espionage themselves related to medical research, because this, of course, would be highly classified.) 

Let’s ask a question: if you are a head of state, and your country is suffering from a terrible pandemic, would you not be crazy to try everything you could to access everything that is known about a vaccine? Surely it is the duty of any government that cares about the well-being of its people to spy for vaccine research. It would be irresponsible not to. Why on earth should the Russian government put the intellectual property rights of U.S. pharmaceuticals above the duty to protect the public health of Russians? No country’s leadership should be expected to think this way.  

But the New York Times does not discuss “saving Russian lives” as a potential Russian motive for wanting to get a vaccine as quickly as possible. Instead, they must be seeking “geopolitical advantage,” or want to preserve their “Kremlin pride.” Russians do not love their families like we love our families. Their effort to create a vaccine is because they want to be “first” whereas ours is because we are pursuing a selfless mission to protect public health. They are trying to “exploit the chaos created by the coronavirus pandemic.” The subhead of the article, “Hackers Sought Data From Companies Trying To Eradicate Coronarvirus,” frames our great companies as the ones trying to eradicate coronavirus, while the actual story is: Entity Trying To Eradicate Coronavirus Sought Data From Other Entity Trying To Eradicate Coronavirus. (The Washington Post story on the hacks contains a similar angle on China’s motivations, quoting Attorney General William Barr saying that “Beijing, ‘desperate for a public relations coup,’ is perhaps hoping to ‘claim credit for any medical breakthroughs.’” We would never do things out of a desire for credit, of course. But the Chinese are schemers, you see, whose primary motives are pride and seeking advantage.) 

Here’s another quote that appears in the New York Times story:

“We condemn these despicable attacks against those doing vital work to combat the coronavirus pandemic,” said Paul Chichester, the director of operations for Britain’s National Cyber Security Center.”

And one from the BBC’s report:

“It was unclear whether any useful information was stolen. But British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said, ‘It is completely unacceptable that the Russian Intelligence Services are targeting those working to combat the coronavirus pandemic.’ He accused Moscow of pursuing ‘selfish interests with reckless behavior.’

Nobody has accused Russia of actually doing any damage to the progress of vaccine research. Yet apparently they have behaved “despicably” and “selfishly.” What are the embedded assumptions in what Chichester and Raab say? First, that it is not despicable for someone to lock up information that they know could help someone else produce a life-saving vaccine. It is however, despicable to try to access that information in order to create a life-saving vaccine, if doing so violates a property law. It is not selfish to prioritize the financial interests of your own country over the lives of people in other countries. It is however, selfish for those countries to prioritize the lives of their people over the financial interests of your country.

You can see that we have entered a moral topsy-turvy land, where greed is good and saving lives is selfish. Now, these are just quotes in the stories from British government officials, not from the journalists writing the stories. But what’s incredible is that nowhere in the stories is anybody quoted questioning the logic of viewing vaccine development as a “competition.” Nobody explains why researchers are keeping their research secret rather than sharing it as widely as possible. There is no discussion of how this constitutes a totally bizarre way to combat a global pandemic, which should not be a “race to see which country can find a vaccine first so that it can force everyone else to pay up if they want to save their people’s lives.” Iran, one of our Official Enemies, is mentioned as one of the countries doing the nefarious spying, but without discussion of the medical situation there that makes obtaining a vaccine so urgent. We’ve lapsed so completely into the destructive logic of selfish nationalism that “cooperating for the collective good of humanity” is so unthinkable as to not even merit discussion. 

Let’s have some moral honesty: the competitive approach is evil. It is criminal that any country is keeping vaccine information secret from other countries in the first place. That is mass murder. In the story of Russia hacking to find out how to make a coronavirus vaccine, the villain is us, not Russia. Vaccines are a public good, not a competition to see who can not die.

In fact, let me go further: if you are working on a vaccine, it is right to share information and wrong not to with those who might also be working on a vaccine. There is even a strong ethical argument to be made that leaking information is an obligation if it can save lives. Nationalism is irrational and indefensible. Russian and Iranian and Chinese grandparents who die struggling to breathe in a Moscow, Tehran, or Beijing ICU are of no less value than American and British grandparents. And this binds all equally: I do not exempt China and Russia from condemnation for keeping secrets. We are human beings, for God’s sake, and seeking national advantage in this moment—especially for rich countries—is disaster profiteering. 

One of the saddest aspects of the COVID-19 disaster is that this should be a moment for global unity and cooperation, but it hasn’t been. One of the most interesting things Ronald Reagan ever said was that, if there was ever an alien invasion, all inter-human conflict would disappear overnight, because we’d have to cooperate to save Earth. People found it a kooky thing to say, but it was actually rather charming. The only problem is, we now know Reagan was completely wrong and naive. We’ve got an alien invasion: an invisible killer that has struck around the world. But instead of helping one another in a coordinated effort, we’re jockeying to see which countries and companies get to extort the others.

Of course, the failure to cooperate hinders progress. If you have 100 people trying to solve a problem but none of them are willing to share what they know with others, opportunities are going to be missed. “Looking out for #1” does not actually help #1 in the end, because everyone’s fates are entwined. You know the lesson of the Prisoner’s Dilemma, right? Perhaps not, because economists blab about the Prisoner’s Dilemma constantly but they never speak clearly about the actual lesson. The lesson is: selfish individualism ends up hurting everyone. Solidarity gets the goods. When we work together, we’re all better off. This is a lesson that you can teach to children, but nationalism turns us all into blind, selfish idiots who think human lives vary in value on the basis of whether they fall on one side or the other of an arbitrary geographic line. 

We see, in this Russia hacking story, how strange the presentation of facts in seemingly neutral news stories can be. The New York Times mentions the DNC hacks and Cold War spying, without talking about how the stakes are quite different in a global pandemic. It treats Russia as sinister, instead of posing the possibility that the sinister ones are those who think vaccines should be kept secret. The superior value of national self-enrichment over maximal prevention of global human suffering is assumed to be legitimate. Sociopathy is presented as Reason.

We have to get past this. If this planet is to have a future, we have to start caring about each other’s interests. I do not support the Russian government, because it is an atrocious human rights violator, Putin is an autocratic criminal, and all governments must be opposed, but what happens to Russians themselves matters to me. They are not my enemies and they are not yours, and to the extent that a government’s actions serve the ends of its people’s health, they may be justifiable even if illegal. The only enemies are those who seek to use other people’s misery as an opportunity to amass more money and power, and those who present that predatory behavior as neutral rather than abhorrent. The New York Times is far more worthy of condemnation than any country trying to hack its way toward a vaccine for coronavirus. 


https://www.currentaffairs.org/2020/07/how-anti-russian-propaganda-works/

Joods Zionistische Leugens

  Red Collective @RedCollectiveUK Don't take my word that Israel killed the majority of its own civilians on October 7th. Here's Is...