zondag 24 februari 2008

Klimaatverandering 127

Vier jaar geleden gerapporteerd en nooit meer iets van vernomen. De politiek blijft op hetzelfde spoor doorgaan: 'Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us
· Secret report warns of rioting and nuclear war· Britain will be 'Siberian' in less than 20 years · Threat to the world is greater than terrorism

This article appeared in the Observer on Sunday February 22 2004 . It was last updated at 01:33 on February 22 2004.

Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters..
A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.
The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents.
'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,' concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would define human life.'
The findings will prove humiliating to the Bush administration, which has repeatedly denied that climate change even exists. Experts said that they will also make unsettling reading for a President who has insisted national defence is a priority.
The report was commissioned by influential Pentagon defence adviser Andrew Marshall, who has held considerable sway on US military thinking over the past three decades. He was the man behind a sweeping recent review aimed at transforming the American military under Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Climate change 'should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a US national security concern', say the authors, Peter Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network.
An imminent scenario of catastrophic climate change is 'plausible and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately', they conclude. As early as next year widespread flooding by a rise in sea levels will create major upheaval for millions.
Last week the Bush administration came under heavy fire from a large body of respected scientists who claimed that it cherry-picked science to suit its policy agenda and suppressed studies that it did not like. Jeremy Symons, a former whistleblower at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said that suppression of the report for four months was a further example of the White House trying to bury the threat of climate change.
Senior climatologists, however, believe that their verdicts could prove the catalyst in forcing Bush to accept climate change as a real and happening phenomenon. They also hope it will convince the United States to sign up to global treaties to reduce the rate of climatic change.
A group of eminent UK scientists recently visited the White House to voice their fears over global warming, part of an intensifying drive to get the US to treat the issue seriously. Sources have told The Observer that American officials appeared extremely sensitive about the issue when faced with complaints that America's public stance appeared increasingly out of touch.
One even alleged that the White House had written to complain about some of the comments attributed to Professor Sir David King, Tony Blair's chief scientific adviser, after he branded the President's position on the issue as indefensible.

Lees verder: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2004/feb/22/usnews.theobserver'

1 opmerking:

  1. Hoi Stan,

    Het doel van het rapport was het inschatten van extreme scenario's:

    Imagining the Unthinkable

    The purpose of this report is to imagine the unthinkable – to push the boundaries of current
    research on climate change so we may better understand the potential implications on United
    States national security.
    We have interviewed leading climate change scientists, conducted additional research, and
    reviewed several iterations of the scenario with these experts. The scientists support this
    project, but caution that the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways. First,
    they suggest the occurrences we outline would most likely happen in a few regions, rather
    than on globally. Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be considerably smaller.
    We have created a climate change scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and
    would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered
    immediately.
    Executive Summary
    There is substantial evidence to indicate that significant global warming will occur
    during the 21st century. Because changes have been gradual so far, and are projected
    to be similarly gradual in the future, the effects of global warming have the potential
    to be manageable for most nations. Recent research, however, suggests that there is a
    possibility that this gradual global warming could lead to a relatively abrupt slowing
    of the ocean’s thermohaline conveyor, which could lead to harsher winter weather
    conditions, sharply reduced soil moisture, and more intense winds in certain regions
    that currently provide a significant fraction of the world’s food production. With
    inadequate preparation, the result could be a significant drop in the human carrying
    capacity of the Earth’s environment.
    The research suggests that once temperature rises above some threshold, adverse
    weather conditions could develop relatively abruptly, with persistent changes in the
    atmospheric circulation causing drops in some regions of 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit in
    a single decade. Paleoclimatic evidence suggests that altered climatic patterns could
    last for as much as a century, as they did when the ocean conveyor collapsed 8,200
    years ago, or, at the extreme, could last as long as 1,000 years as they did during the
    Younger Dryas, which began about 12,700 years ago.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen