Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Theresa May Threatens Russia

Russian spy attack: Vladimir Putin has 24 hours to explain how deadly nerve agent was used on UK soil, says Theresa May

Theresa May has given Vladimir Putin 24 hours to explain how a deadly Russian nerve agent was used in an assassination attempt on British soil, as she said it is “highly likely” Moscow was responsible.
She vowed Britain will pursue “extensive measures” unless a credible account can be given as to how military-grade Novichokwas deployed, leaving an ex-spy, his daughter and a British policeman in hospital.
Retaliatory action that might be announced as early as Wednesday could potentially include a larger military presence in Eastern Europe, fresh sanctions and action at the United Nations.
Government sources told The IndependentBritish ministers have also discussed expelling the Russian Ambassador in response to what Ms May branded a “reckless and despicable act”. Ms May said if there is no “credible response” by the end of Tuesday, then the UK would conclude there has been an “unlawful use of force” by Moscow.
The White House immediately backed Britain on Monday, branding the attack as “reckless, indiscriminate and irresponsible”, but Moscow dismissed the Prime Minister’s statement as a “circus”.
Ms May revealed experts at Britain’s Porton Down defence laboratory have confirmed the Salisbury attack involved highly-specialised Novichok, first developed by the Soviet Union in the 1970s.
Updating the Commons, she explained that as a result it is “highly likely that Russia was responsible” for the act against ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, which also left Wiltshire Police Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey in a serious condition and parts of the medieval cathedral city off limits.
The Prime Minister went on: “This attempted murder using a weapons-grade nerve agent in a British town was not just a crime against the Skripals.
“It was an indiscriminate and reckless act against the United Kingdom, putting the lives of innocent civilians at risk.
This attempted murder using a weapons-grade nerve agent in a British town was not just a crime against the Skripals. It was an indiscriminate and reckless act against the United Kingdom, putting the lives of innocent civilians at risk.
Prime Minister Theresa May
“And we will not tolerate such a brazen attempt to murder innocent civilians on our soil.”
She argued there are only two plausible explanations for the attack on 4 March – a “direct act by the Russian state against our country” or that Russia allowed the nerve agent to fall “into the hands of others”.
MPs were told that Foreign Secretary Boris Johnsoncalled-in Russia’s Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko to demand answers, with sources later telling The Independent the meeting just before 4pm was only five minutes long.
Describing the tone of the face-to-face, a Foreign Office insider said it was “cool but firm, and there was no handshake”.  
The “outrage” felt by the British public was made clear to Mr Yakovenko, who was told his country had until midnight on Tuesday to explain itself.
Downing Street officials explained that cabinet ministers and security chiefs will discuss the Russian response at a meeting of the National Security Council on Wednesday, ahead of a potential further statement to the Commons that afternoon.
Speaking to MPs on Monday, Ms May set out a “well-established pattern of Russian state aggression” – including invading Crimea, fomenting overseas conflict, violating European airspace and meddling in other country’s elections.
She then went on to give a strong indication of potential avenues for action, saying the UK is committed to collective defence through NATO “in the face of Russian behaviour”.
She added: “Indeed our armed forces have a leading role in Nato’s Enhanced Forward Presence with British troops leading a multinational battle group in Estonia.
“We have led the way in securing tough sanctions against the Russian economy. And we have at all stages worked closely with our allies and we will continue to do so.
“We must now stand ready to take much more extensive measures.”
She also signalled a push at the UN saying that the attack had been an “unlawful use of force”, something that would constitute a breach of Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter.
One minister told The Independent: “We have already been discussing kicking the ambassador out, it had seemed too early before today. But things are different now.”
Commons Foreign Affairs Committee chairman and Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat said Russia’s actions were “deeply threatening to the British people”.
While a string of Labour MPs stood to show solidarity with Ms May’s approach, their leader Jeremy Corbyn chose to make a political point about donations the Conservatives have received from Russian business people.
Mr Putin dismissed claims about his state’s alleged involvement on Monday, telling a BBC reporter who questioned him on a visit to a grain centre: “We’re dealing with agriculture here ... and you talk to me about some tragedies.
“Get to the bottom of things there, then we’ll discuss this.”
The Kremlin has denied involvement, while the Russian embassy accused Britain of playing a “very dangerous game” and warned of “serious long-term consequences” and Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova branded Ms May’ statement “a circus show in the British parliament”.
Andrei Lugovoi, one of the two men accused of assassinating Alexander Litvinenko with radioactive polonium in 2006, said Britain’s response to events was suspiciously quick. Evidence, he said, that London was operating according to its own script.
Alexander Litvinenko, killed after being poisoned in 2006, and Andrei Lugovoi (right) accused of the murders, who said the UK was not seeking the truth in the Skripal case (Getty Images)
“Any chemist or physicist will tell you that as a minimum you need some kind of serious expertise on a serious expert level to determine whether or not a country is responsible,” he told the Interfax news agency. “When such statements are made in the course of a few days, this speaks only of irresponsibility and the fact that they haven’t set out to discover the truth.”
The White House response did not directly mention Russia, but said: “The use of a highly lethal nerve agent against UK citizens on UK soil is an outrage.
“The attack was reckless, indiscriminate and irresponsible…we stand by our closest ally in the special relationship that we have.”
Downing Street officials said discussions with other allies were taking place at the highest official level.


    Populaire posts van deze blog

    Geert Mak Pleit Nu Voor Vriendschap met Rusland

    Ik kwam zojuist mijn oude vriend, de bestseller-auteur en mainstream-opiniemaker Geert Mak in de regen op straat tegen. Na elkaar te hebben begroet, vertelde Geert mij dat hij van oordeel is dat Europa zo snel mogelijk met Rusland om de tafel moet gaan zitten, om de opgelopen spanningen te deëscaleren. De VS heeft heel andere belangen dan 'wij,' aldus Mak, die benadrukte dat de macht van 'onze' Atlantische bondgenoot ingrijpend aan het afnemen is. Kortom, ik hoorde wat ikzelf al enige jaren op mijn weblog schrijf. Opvallend hoe een Nederlandse opiniemaker binnen zo'n betrekkelijk korte tijd zo wezenlijk van oordeel kan veranderen.  Immers, Mak’s gevaarlijke anti-Rusland hetze was een treffend voorbeeld van zijn opportunisme. Mei 2014 beweerde op de Hilversumse televisie de zogeheten ‘chroniqueur van Amsterdam, Nederland, Europa en de VS,’ dat er sprake was van een 'Russische gevaar,’ aangezien ‘meneer Poetin’ aan ‘landjepik’ deed en dat de Russische president d…

    America Has Been at War 93% of the Time Since 1776

    America Has Been at War 93% of the Time – 222 out of 239 Years – Since 1776 By Washington's Blog Global Research, December 26, 2017 Washington's Blog 20 February 2015 Region:  Theme: 

    De Geldlust van de Mainstream Media Mede mogelijk gemaakt door de overheid: wanbetaling van freelancers Actueel Nederlandse mediabedrijven krijgen wel degelijk staatssteun. Het mag alleen niet zo heten. Een soepele opstelling van de toezichthouder en een voorkeursbehandeling door de Belastingdienst houden kranten en tijdschriften overeind die het anders niet zouden redden. De rekening gaat naar onderbetaalde nieuwsarbeiders. Tegenover de schrale beloning van freelance journalisten staan mooie winsten van mediabedrijven en bovenmodale salarissen voor journalisten in vaste dienst. Kranten mogen het volgens de oplagecijfers en advertentie-inkomsten zwaar hebben, hun uitgevers en hoofdredacties weten die pijn bekwaam af te wentelen op andere belanghebbenden.  De Persgroep legde over 2017 opnieuw 40 miljoen euro dividend opzij voor de eigenaren, de familie Van Thillo. U…