Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Theresa May’s UN speech reveals blatant double standards

Theresa May’s UN speech reveals blatant double standards about her Saudi arms deals

 Facebook Twitter
On 20 September, Prime Minister Theresa May addressed the UN General Assembly in New York. Her speech meandered through the usual topics – Brexit, terrorism, and policing the internet. But in typical style, she appeared to shoot herself in the foot when discussing global security.

The US and North Korea 

May’s speech came hot on the heels of US President Donald Trump’s, which came the day before. In a bombastic debut appearance, Trump described North Korean leader Kim Jong-un as “rocket man” and threatened to “totally destroy North Korea”. The North Koreans responded by describing Trump as a ‘barking dog’.
Trump’s remarks provoked such shock that May apparently directed her comments at him as well as Kim Jong-un. She discussed “global values”, and made a clear reference to North Korea’s attempts to develop nuclear weaponry. She said:
it is this rules-based system which we have developed – including the institutions, the international frameworks… and laws and conventions like the Non-Proliferation Treaty – which enables the global co-operation through which we can protect those values.

The UK and Saudi Arabia

During May’s seven years as Home Secretary and PM, she has personally been involved in arms trading between the UK and Saudi Arabia. It’s estimated that, as a result, British contracts with the Saudis are worth an eye-popping £6bn.
This profit has been made since Saudi Arabia started its controversial bombing campaign in Yemen in 2015. UNICEF and Save the Children have both described the bombing as “indiscriminate”. And often, the victims and targets appear to be civilian.

The Arms Trade Treaty

May’s apparently profit-based support of Saudi Arabia therefore seems to contravene a treaty the UK has signed. The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international weapons trade and is very clear in its provisos. Among other stipulations, it states:
licences cannot be granted ‘if there is clear risk that the items might be used in the commission of a serious violation of international humanitarian law’.
According to international law, it is a war crime to:
make the civilian population, or individual civilians not taking part in hostilities, the object of attack

What this says about Theresa May

The UN was supposedly conceived to prevent war whenever possible. Speaking before its members, however, May showed her true colours. She verbally attacked nations that flout treaties and international law. But at the same time, she almost certainly knew that her Saudi allies are doing the very same thing. And by supporting them for profit, our government shares their guilt.
There is a word for this sort of thing. And it’s hypocrisy.
Get Involved:
– Join The Canary so we can continue to bring you the news that matters
– See more Canary articles related to arms and Saudi Arabia here. Also read more from The Canary Global. And follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more independent international coverage.
Featured image from YouTube


Populaire posts van deze blog

Geert Mak Pleit Nu Voor Vriendschap met Rusland

Ik kwam zojuist mijn oude vriend, de bestseller-auteur en mainstream-opiniemaker Geert Mak in de regen op straat tegen. Na elkaar te hebben begroet, vertelde Geert mij dat hij van oordeel is dat Europa zo snel mogelijk met Rusland om de tafel moet gaan zitten, om de opgelopen spanningen te deëscaleren. De VS heeft heel andere belangen dan 'wij,' aldus Mak, die benadrukte dat de macht van 'onze' Atlantische bondgenoot ingrijpend aan het afnemen is. Kortom, ik hoorde wat ikzelf al enige jaren op mijn weblog schrijf. Opvallend hoe een Nederlandse opiniemaker binnen zo'n betrekkelijk korte tijd zo wezenlijk van oordeel kan veranderen.  Immers, Mak’s gevaarlijke anti-Rusland hetze was een treffend voorbeeld van zijn opportunisme. Mei 2014 beweerde op de Hilversumse televisie de zogeheten ‘chroniqueur van Amsterdam, Nederland, Europa en de VS,’ dat er sprake was van een 'Russische gevaar,’ aangezien ‘meneer Poetin’ aan ‘landjepik’ deed en dat de Russische president d…

America Has Been at War 93% of the Time Since 1776

America Has Been at War 93% of the Time – 222 out of 239 Years – Since 1776 By Washington's Blog Global Research, December 26, 2017 Washington's Blog 20 February 2015 Region:  Theme: 

Native American Rape Survivors

A sign marks the entrance to White Earth Indian Reservation in Mahnomen County, Minn. (J. Stephen Conn / CC 2.0) WHITE EARTH RESERVATION, Minn.—Candice (not her real name) awoke with a start. Someone was pulling down her sweatpants. It was a male friend. “Stop!” she shouted. He kept groping her. She kicked him and he fell off the bed. She dashed out of the bedroom, tripping and tumbling down the stairs. Gripped with fear, she heard his footsteps behind her in the dark and forced herself to stand upright as she staggered out to the porch. Candice was still intoxicated. She got into her car and drove into a ditch. A white police officer pulled up. She struggled to hold back tears as she told him about the attempted rape. All the officer saw was a drunk and disorderly Native American woman. He dismissed Candice’s report of sexual assault as a lie she had made up to avoid getting a DUI. He did not take her to the hospital for a forensic exam. The sexual assault was not recorded in his pol…