Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Zionist Fascism and The West

Explained: Israeli Demolitions 

Between January and August 2016, 684 Palestinian-owned structures have been levelled, displacing 990 residents 
Israel’s latest round of home demolitions in the Palestinian villages of Umm Al-Khair and Sussia in the occupied West Bank appear to be part of a surge in the use of demolitions seen in 2016. Up until 1 August, 684 Palestinian-owned structures have been levelled, displacing 990 residents. That’s more Palestinians displaced so far in 2016 than in the whole of 2015.
These home demolitions in the Occupied West Bank have been used by Israel as a means of creating space to expand illegal Israeli settlements and discourage Palestinians from living in Area C, which is an area that engulfs around 60% of the Occupied West Bank and falls entirely under the Israeli occupation’s military and administrative control. So on what grounds does Israel carry out its land seizures and home demolitions?

No Permits

From the very outset of Israel’s occupation of Palestine in 1967, it has established a planning and construction policy that heavily restricts construction by Palestinians while allowing and facilitating Israeli settlements expansion. These restrictions left many Palestinian structures – including homes, schools and even agricultural infrastructure – subject to demolition orders on the grounds that no building permits have been issued and have thus been built illegally, even though many of them pre-date the occupation.

A Punitive Measure

Since 1967, Israel has also used home demolitions as a punitive measure. Israel’s declared rationale of the demolitions was that harming the property of the families of Palestinians who perpetrated attacks against Israelis or who were suspected of involvement in attacks would deter others. In 2005, the policy ceased as a military commission found that the deterrent value of demolitions had not been proven and that the policy may even have the opposite effect. The practice, however, resumed in the summer of 2014.
Israel has stepped up its demolition activity in recent years, and has displaced at least 3,799 Palestinians since the beginning of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s term in March 2009 (UNOCHA).
Settlement building and Israel’s demolition policies, which often go hand in hand, are both explicit violations of international law. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the establishment of Israeli settler communities in the Occupied Territories, and it restricts demolition of property to cases of “military necessity”.
In addition, these policies undermine the prospects for the internationally supported two-state solution, by making it almost impossible for Palestinians to build in Area C of the West Bank, while allowing the expansion of Israeli settlements in the area.
This has been of concern to Western governments, so much so that the US State Department said in a recent statement that the demolition of Palestinian homes and settlement construction “is part of an ongoing process of land seizures, settlement expansion, legalisations of outposts, and denial of Palestinian development that risk entrenching a one-state reality of perpetual occupation and conflict.”
But this begs the question: If these policies have been recognised by the West as “very troubling”, “provocative and counterproductive”, then why are the demolitions still taking place? Why is Israel not being held accountable?


Een reactie posten

Populaire posts van deze blog

Geert Mak Pleit Nu Voor Vriendschap met Rusland

Ik kwam zojuist mijn oude vriend, de bestseller-auteur en mainstream-opiniemaker Geert Mak in de regen op straat tegen. Na elkaar te hebben begroet, vertelde Geert mij dat hij van oordeel is dat Europa zo snel mogelijk met Rusland om de tafel moet gaan zitten, om de opgelopen spanningen te deëscaleren. De VS heeft heel andere belangen dan 'wij,' aldus Mak, die benadrukte dat de macht van 'onze' Atlantische bondgenoot ingrijpend aan het afnemen is. Kortom, ik hoorde wat ikzelf al enige jaren op mijn weblog schrijf. Opvallend hoe een Nederlandse opiniemaker binnen zo'n betrekkelijk korte tijd zo wezenlijk van oordeel kan veranderen.  Immers, Mak’s gevaarlijke anti-Rusland hetze was een treffend voorbeeld van zijn opportunisme. Mei 2014 beweerde op de Hilversumse televisie de zogeheten ‘chroniqueur van Amsterdam, Nederland, Europa en de VS,’ dat er sprake was van een 'Russische gevaar,’ aangezien ‘meneer Poetin’ aan ‘landjepik’ deed en dat de Russische president d…

America Has Been at War 93% of the Time Since 1776

America Has Been at War 93% of the Time – 222 out of 239 Years – Since 1776 By Washington's Blog Global Research, December 26, 2017 Washington's Blog 20 February 2015 Region:  Theme: 

Native American Rape Survivors

A sign marks the entrance to White Earth Indian Reservation in Mahnomen County, Minn. (J. Stephen Conn / CC 2.0) WHITE EARTH RESERVATION, Minn.—Candice (not her real name) awoke with a start. Someone was pulling down her sweatpants. It was a male friend. “Stop!” she shouted. He kept groping her. She kicked him and he fell off the bed. She dashed out of the bedroom, tripping and tumbling down the stairs. Gripped with fear, she heard his footsteps behind her in the dark and forced herself to stand upright as she staggered out to the porch. Candice was still intoxicated. She got into her car and drove into a ditch. A white police officer pulled up. She struggled to hold back tears as she told him about the attempted rape. All the officer saw was a drunk and disorderly Native American woman. He dismissed Candice’s report of sexual assault as a lie she had made up to avoid getting a DUI. He did not take her to the hospital for a forensic exam. The sexual assault was not recorded in his pol…