Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Trump v. Clinton Debacle

Tuesday Night Massacre: The Looming Trump v. Clinton Debacle

Wednesday, 27 April 2016 00:00 By William Rivers Pitt, Truthout | Op-Ed
Hillary Clinton, a Democratic presidential hopeful, speaks to reporters outside Douglas G. Grafflin Elementary School, where she casted her ballot, in Chappaqua, N.Y., April 19, 2016. Clinton and Donald Trump are heavily favored to win Tuesday’s primaries in New York. (Eric Thayer / The New York Times)Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton speaks to reporters outside Douglas G. Grafflin Elementary School, where she cast her ballot, in Chappaqua, New York, April 19, 2016. (Photo: Eric Thayer / The New York Times)
The surrealist painting that is this election season came into grim focus last night as the two big-money front-runners blew the doors off their respective rivals and came many steps closer to giving the "news" media the general election race they've been craving. Donald Trump won everything by margins so wide you could sail an aircraft carrier through them. Hillary Clinton took four out of five contests, with Bernie Sanders picking up Rhode Island. It was near-comprehensive domination, and unless Trump bursts into flames or Clinton starts eating live wombats during a press conference, we're all staring the general election contest dead in the face.
Last night for Donald Trump: 58 percent in Connecticut, 61 percent in Delaware, 54 percent in Maryland, 56 percent in Pennsylvania and a whopping 64 percent in Rhode Island. Last night for Clinton: 52 percent in Connecticut, 60 percent in Delaware, 63 percent in Maryland and 56 percent in Pennsylvania. It wasn't close.
This endgame is not surprising if you take the long view. The two parties have been devolving into one fixed entity for a long while now, and the two leading candidates are perfect avatars of that phenomenon. Add to that the fact that the media lust after this match-up. You have the rich braggart with an inferiority complex so large it dwarfs Saturn using racism, sexism, nationalism and a generalized fear of The Other to elbow his way toward the nomination. You have the rich political aristocrat who votes for war, total surveillance and thinks fracking is the greatest thing since glazed donuts trying to pass herself off as some sort of transformative populist while cashing Wall Street checks by the fistful.
It is madness, but it is madness by design. The Republican Party and its media allies have spent several decades fomenting a sense of terror within their voting ranks -- fear of the immigrant, fear of the Black man, fear of a woman's power to choose, fear of the terrorist hiding under the bed. They have diligently trashed the basic functions of government so they can go on the Sunday talk shows and blather about how government doesn't work. The Democrats, for their part, have been in full moral retreat over those same decades, fleeing the legacy of FDR and their own alleged principles to such a vast degree that a candidate who voted like a conservative every time the chips were down is about to grab the brass ring.
It was a hard night for the Bernie Sanders campaign, and for Ted Cruz and John Kasich. Supporters of all three are likely staring at the wall right now, wondering what in the world went wrong. It's not over, of course -- suggesting it is to their supporters will elicit howls of rage -- but really, yeah, it's over. Marco Rubio has been out of the race for weeks and still has more delegates than John Kasich. While Cruz is faring better, name-dropping Carly Fiorina is not going to save his campaign.
As far as I am concerned, Bernie Sanders has done the nation a huge service. It is, in a way, as if the distilled essence of the Occupy movement took corporeal form in Vermont and ran for president. He put economic injustice and climate change on the dashboard of his campaign bus and stomped on the gas. He showed us what we can be instead of what we are, but unless the aforementioned wombat massacre happens, he will not be the Democratic nominee. Tuesday all but nailed that door shut.
Indiana is next, followed by Nebraska, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon, Washington State, California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and the District of Colombia. Put another way, we're in the home stretch and this strange thing is almost over. As a political writer, I find the thought of reaching the finish line refreshing: no more sleepless Tuesdays and exhausted Wednesdays until November.
As a human being and a father, however, I find the whole exercise appalling and terrifying. This is the best we can do, really? This is what we have become. The only reason people will vote for Trump in the general election is because they have been trained to be afraid. The only reason people will vote for Clinton in the general election is to thwart Comb-Over Mussolini and his dreams of glory; once again, people will be voting against instead of voting for, because "she can win," allegedly.
The whole thing has been bizarre and gruesome from the jump, and the only good I can see coming out of it is the slim possibility that the nation looks long and hard in the mirror once the smoke has cleared and decides that enough is enough.
What a pluperfect mess.
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.


William Rivers Pitt is Truthout's senior editor and lead columnist. He is also a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of three books: War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to KnowThe Greatest Sedition Is Silence and House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation. His fourth book, The Mass Destruction of Iraq: Why It Is Happening, and Who Is Responsible, co-written with Dahr Jamail, is available now on Amazon. He lives and works in New Hampshire.


Populaire posts van deze blog

Geert Mak Pleit Nu Voor Vriendschap met Rusland

Ik kwam zojuist mijn oude vriend, de bestseller-auteur en mainstream-opiniemaker Geert Mak in de regen op straat tegen. Na elkaar te hebben begroet, vertelde Geert mij dat hij van oordeel is dat Europa zo snel mogelijk met Rusland om de tafel moet gaan zitten, om de opgelopen spanningen te deëscaleren. De VS heeft heel andere belangen dan 'wij,' aldus Mak, die benadrukte dat de macht van 'onze' Atlantische bondgenoot ingrijpend aan het afnemen is. Kortom, ik hoorde wat ikzelf al enige jaren op mijn weblog schrijf. Opvallend hoe een Nederlandse opiniemaker binnen zo'n betrekkelijk korte tijd zo wezenlijk van oordeel kan veranderen.  Immers, Mak’s gevaarlijke anti-Rusland hetze was een treffend voorbeeld van zijn opportunisme. Mei 2014 beweerde op de Hilversumse televisie de zogeheten ‘chroniqueur van Amsterdam, Nederland, Europa en de VS,’ dat er sprake was van een 'Russische gevaar,’ aangezien ‘meneer Poetin’ aan ‘landjepik’ deed en dat de Russische president d…

America Has Been at War 93% of the Time Since 1776

America Has Been at War 93% of the Time – 222 out of 239 Years – Since 1776 By Washington's Blog Global Research, December 26, 2017 Washington's Blog 20 February 2015 Region:  Theme: 

De Geldlust van de Mainstream Media Mede mogelijk gemaakt door de overheid: wanbetaling van freelancers Actueel Nederlandse mediabedrijven krijgen wel degelijk staatssteun. Het mag alleen niet zo heten. Een soepele opstelling van de toezichthouder en een voorkeursbehandeling door de Belastingdienst houden kranten en tijdschriften overeind die het anders niet zouden redden. De rekening gaat naar onderbetaalde nieuwsarbeiders. Tegenover de schrale beloning van freelance journalisten staan mooie winsten van mediabedrijven en bovenmodale salarissen voor journalisten in vaste dienst. Kranten mogen het volgens de oplagecijfers en advertentie-inkomsten zwaar hebben, hun uitgevers en hoofdredacties weten die pijn bekwaam af te wentelen op andere belanghebbenden.  De Persgroep legde over 2017 opnieuw 40 miljoen euro dividend opzij voor de eigenaren, de familie Van Thillo. U…